Polish site pegs Apple's AirPower charging mat at $199
A Polish online store has posted a listing for Apple's AirPower charging mat, due in 2018, claiming the product will cost 999 zlotys or about $273.99 -- which one news site suggests will translate to about $199 in the U.S.

The pricing -- noticed by ThinkApple -- is most likely the retailer's speculation, but might theoretically come from Apple. Regardless, both the $199 and $273.99 figures are probably higher than what U.S. customers will actually pay.
$199 would be a tough ask, despite the premium Apple accessories command and the AirPower's ability to charge up to three devices at once. Single-device charging pads sold by Belkin and Mophie cost $59.95.
Consider that at $199, the AirPower would be more expensive than Apple's own AirPods, which sell for $159.
Neither Apple nor the Polish store -- X-Kom -- have set out a firm launch date.
The AirPower will support the iPhone 8, iPhone X, and Apple Watch Series 3, as well as an upcoming AirPods case that might arrive as soon as December. Still unknown is how much wattage the pad will offer. By default the iPhone X supports just 5 watts, but a future software update will raise that ceiling to 7.5 watts.

The pricing -- noticed by ThinkApple -- is most likely the retailer's speculation, but might theoretically come from Apple. Regardless, both the $199 and $273.99 figures are probably higher than what U.S. customers will actually pay.
$199 would be a tough ask, despite the premium Apple accessories command and the AirPower's ability to charge up to three devices at once. Single-device charging pads sold by Belkin and Mophie cost $59.95.
Consider that at $199, the AirPower would be more expensive than Apple's own AirPods, which sell for $159.
Neither Apple nor the Polish store -- X-Kom -- have set out a firm launch date.
The AirPower will support the iPhone 8, iPhone X, and Apple Watch Series 3, as well as an upcoming AirPods case that might arrive as soon as December. Still unknown is how much wattage the pad will offer. By default the iPhone X supports just 5 watts, but a future software update will raise that ceiling to 7.5 watts.
Comments
That said, I don't see this costing $200. $100 makes more sense.
Hope not.
I don't know since we haven't seen teardowns and tests, but might be like buying a knockoff PSU v a quality PSU from Apple.
PS: One thing AirPower doesn't do is allow you to use Nightstand mode since the watch has to lay flat. This may also affect those with metal bands that create loops. Sounds like a good business option for something to create a vertical Watch stand to sit at the back of the AirPower (and separately) that will allow power passthrough betwee the cable and AirPower stand. If it's a Lightning cable that might not be possible, but if they're using USB-C it would be. If the former is in play (which I'd think it is), you could ways have a Qi stand that sits on the AirPower charger and passes power via wires to another Qi charger sitting vertically with a magnet so you can have Nightstand Mode. This could even be the included charger from ALL Apple Watches that plugs into the stand and wraps the cable around the base.
Yup, that's what I'm currently using - the standard charger on a third party stand.
I did have this conversation a few days about how AirPower could work with the connected band (I know many people using their SS band) and/or Nightstand Mode. I came up with two possible solutions:
The first is having a small Watch pedestal with a Qi charger receiver on its base that will pull power from the AirPower pad—perhaps with something that tucks in underneath the back edge for better support—that will then send power up to another inductive charger. This would potentially allow you to place your Watch either so that connects band hangs below, placed sideways and even turned (depends on how the AirPower pad is placed in your bedroom) so that you can have Nightstand Mode.
Additionally, because it's a 3rd-party device, it could be made to work with Series 0–2 Watches, which don't support the Qi standard like Series 3, but that likely means that this pedestal concept would need a USB-A port for the Apple-branded inductive charger for Series 0-2 could be charged as I don't Apple licenses that. That actually makes this cheaper, even for Series 3, but could be a design issue in terms of size since Series 0 came with that 2 meter cable.
The second option I considered isn't much different from the first, except that instead of pulling power from AirPower's charging pad It uses a power pass through from the cable that clearly plugs into the back of the AirPower pad. If this is Lightning then this would be an issue for female Lightning ports as I think MFi only allows for male plugs, but if it's USB-C then it's doable.