Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
I have no idea what that has to do with anything I said.
That's okay.
I didn't have a clue what your point was either.
1) If you had no clue then why would you post a link with no context or follow up question?
2) What's hard to understand that stating that "autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream" regardless as to whether they're currently better or worse than human drivers in preventing accidents?
Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big failure of the sensors. This lady was right in front, and no braking at all, it seems. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.
I’d say that last sentence has nothing to do with your assessment of the crash.
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
I like his suggestion at the end of his piece too.
Waymo and Google, as an example, appear to be very serious about safety in their public testing, which contrasts sharply with Uber's history in all aspects of autonomous vehicles. Stealing tech? Uber did that too.
NTSB should recommend indefinite suspension of Uber's autonomous public testing program, or in lieu of that, require governmental and public oversight on a very granular level.
Comments
For example, this would also be true if, say, a car prevented injury that a human couldn’t:
“Whoa, after seeing the video, seems like a big win for autonomous driving. The guy was looking at his console when she stepped out, which means her life was saved by the car’s system. Autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream.”
I like his suggestion at the end of his piece too.
I didn't have a clue what your point was either.
2) What's hard to understand that stating that "autonomous cars have a ways to go before they'll be mainstream" regardless as to whether they're currently better or worse than human drivers in preventing accidents?
NTSB should recommend indefinite suspension of Uber's autonomous public testing program, or in lieu of that, require governmental and public oversight on a very granular level.