First, there is no reason to not take the Bloomberg article seriously -- they had nothing to gain by fabricating this. It was based on real sources with solid evidence. Was it completely and totally accurate? No initial research piece ever is.
And, the vehemence of the response -- exemplified by this from Homeland security -- reinforces that something happened. If it were just a bogus article they wouldn't be spending so much time and energy trying to discredit it.
And, as I said elsewhere, cyberwarfare is the warfare of the future. We need to learn how to deal with it. Now would be a good time to start.
To date, our response to cyber attacks has been: "Hey! Don't do that anymore! That's not nice!" and the attacker invariably responds with: "Who? talking me?"
Bloomberg needs to prove its allegations. Saying what they think is going on doesn't prove anything. Apple is the top company when it comes to users privacy and data. So it's on Bloomberg to prove what they have wrote. I don't think they will be able to do that. So pretty much fake news trying to make Apple look bad. Looks like they made themselves look bad instead.
Bloomberg needs to prove its allegations. Saying what they think is going on doesn't prove anything. Apple is the top company when it comes to users privacy and data. So it's on Bloomberg to prove what they have wrote. I don't think they will be able to do that. So pretty much fake news trying to make Apple look bad. Looks like they made themselves look bad instead.
Bloomberg wasn't attacking Apple. It was reporting a Chinese attack on America.
Comments