Video: iPhone XR versus Galaxy S10e photo quality comparison

Posted:
in iPhone edited August 2019
The budget-friendly iPhone XR and Samsung Galaxy S10e both have extremely capable shooters packed into their attractive -- and lower-cost -- designs. We pit the pair against each other to see which one has the overall best low-cost flagship camera system.

iPhone XR and Galaxy S10e
iPhone XR and Galaxy S10e


While the Galaxy S10 and S10+ have held the bulk of the attention, the S10e has made its way to consumers as well. Like the iPhone XR, the S10e is a lower cost model that makes a few compromises on the features of the phone that will appeal to a large population.

As far as cameras go, the S10e has the least amount of cameras at its disposal. The S10+ has five (rear wide, rear tele, rear Ultra Wide, front RGB depth camera, front selfie camera), the S10 has four (all the same but loses the front RGB depth camera), and the S10e has three.

When opting for the S10e, you lose out on the front RGB depth camera as well as the rear 2X tele lens.

Otherwise, specs are the same as the S10+ we pitted against the iPhone XS Max. That includes a 12MP 26mm wide angle lens, a 16MP 12mm Ultra Wide lens, and a front-facing 8MP selfie cam. The wide angle has a Dual Aperture /1.5-2.4 which can help for quick shots and low light.

Comparatively, the iPhone XR only has a 12MP on the back. There is the standard 12MP /1.8 wide angle lens which is the equivalent of a 26mm lens -- same as the S10e. On the front is a 7MP camera with an f/2.2 aperture.






Just looking at the specs alone on paper, we would expect that the S10e will suffer when using any form of zoom, but will beat out the iPhone with the Ultra Wide lens. That said, enough hypothesizing and let's get into the sample imagery.

Real world photos

To start, we went out and shot some night photography.

Galaxy S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)
Galaxy S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)


In this image, you can see how the S10e determined it was a night shot and applied an extra starburst effect to all of the lights above the street. This is going to be personal preference, but in some shots it can be a bit much and look fake. Used more subtly, this could add a bit of extra drama to a shot. Otherwise, we felt the iPhone produced deeper blacks and a more appealing image.

Just as with the S10+, the most impressive shots from the S10e use the Ultra Wide lens. First, we shot this fountain with the Galaxy S10e.

S10e wide angle shot overlayed on an Ultra Wide lens shot
S10e wide angle shot overlayed on an Ultra Wide lens shot


Then we went and shot it with the Ultra Wide lens of the S10e and overlayed the original. You see how much more of the scene is captured in the image.

It really can capture some amazing shots, especially when exploring nature, cities, or tight spaces. There is distortion and curvature around the edges, but that is the tradeoff you get for having the lens at all. With the overlayed shots, you can see a slight dip in image quality overall when using the Ultra Wide lens, with this night shot looking slightly washed out compared to the wide lens with a hair less detail.

S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)
S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)


We then tried out so food photography. The images here were clearly better on the S10e than the XR. More more using the automatic scene detection built in, the S10e identified it as food and boosted saturation and contrast. The iPhone's image looks flat and unappetizing in comparison. The S10e also has a dedicated "food" mode but you have to get further from the dish and it applies a similar color effect, while also darkening and blurring the surrounding area.

S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)


In this shot of flowers, we prefer the image of the flowers produced by the iPhone. The color was more vivid and the focus was better. However, it also made the background too warm. The Galaxy S10e was able to keep the background more natural.

S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)
S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)


We took some shots of water -- albeit frozen water -- and were surprised with the results. This time, the iPhone had a better white balance. It kept things cooler looking while the S10e made it a bit too warm and yellow. The sky also looked better on the XR shot.

S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)
S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)


When snapping pics of various desktop toys, we were torn with the results. The iPhone certainly had an overall darker image, but the color looked better. The S10e was brighter, though slightly washed out. We figure the S10e wasn't able to determine what the photo subject was, and therefore was not able to apply specific corrections as it had done with the food and night scenes to make them pop.

S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)
S10e (above) and iPhone XR (below)


Our sleeping puppy was the subject of this shot. With his dark black hair, he can be a difficult photo subject. Luckily, both cameras did a good job. The iPhone has a fantastic dynamic range and was able to keep Dublin's face a more natural black, while still retaining detail. As the Galaxy lacks a bit of this range, it instead had to lighten his face. Otherwise, the blanket colors and balance were both better on the S10e.

Depth of field photography

S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)


We then tried out some depth of field photography, first with non-human subjects. This ice cream cone was a perfect stand in and gave each phone a challenge.

The Galaxy S10e took quite a bit of time identifying the subject before it could adequately blur the background. Even then, it kept cutting off parts of our hand or the cone. Eventually, we got it where wanted and it retained a solid amount of separation between the ice cream and background.

The iPhone also had a difficult time, especially since we had to be so far away to take the picture. Once it locked in, it did a great job though the subject has less sharpness.

iPhone XR Portrait mode
iPhone XR Portrait mode


Then we turned to human subjects. This picture from the iPhone is very well done with solid background separation, especially around the hair and arm. Skin tones are spot on and there is great detail.

Galaxy S10e Live focus
Galaxy S10e Live focus


The S10e, just as the S10+, struggled here. We see a substantial amount of smoothing going on and the skin tones are far too light. When comparing, you can see even the shirt lost detail. Apple took quite the beating for the "beautygate" ordeal and now Samsung is doing the same.

S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)
S10e (right) and iPhone XR (left)


When we used the front-facing camera, we saw the same issues of washed out skin tones and too-smooth subjects.

Which is the better camera?

Choosing which camera is better between the S10e and the XR is even more difficult than between the S10+ and XS Max.

iPhone XR and Galaxy S10e
iPhone XR and Galaxy S10e


Even with the lack of telephoto lenses, these phones take some solid photos. Each had their pros, as well as their cons. The S10e wowed us with the Ultra Wide lens, subject identification and food photography.

On the other hand, the iPhone did a better job with portrait shots and more natural looking colors.

Which of those is more important, is something the user will have to decide. Since much can be done in editing, the S10e may have the edge today, purely for the addition of that Ultra Wide lens.

Where to buy

The Samsung Galaxy S10e can be ordered from Samsung directly, as well as at Samsung authorized dealers, such as B&H Photo and Amazon.com, with prices starting at $749.99.

Meanwhile, the following carriers are also offering incentives on both Apple and Samsung devices:

Carrier deals:

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,442member
    I would want to know which looked more accurate or natural. Everything else is subjective and open for interpretation.
    For example, on the shots with the Lego toy. Which looks more like reality when you took the photo? It looks like two different tables. Which is correct?
    Also, the lighting in the background. Are they dark blue or teal?
    How dark was the room when you took the pic? Is the iPhone darker than what the eye perceived or is the Samsung adding brightness that wasn't there?

    ghidoran2itivguy1STnTENDERBITSdws-2watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 7
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,338member
    Drives me nuts when the front-facing camera flips the image around. Which camera had it correct? They are opposite each other.
  • Reply 3 of 7
    simply258simply258 Posts: 133member
    Drives me nuts when the front-facing camera flips the image around. Which camera had it correct? They are opposite each other.
    Looking at the portrait photos, the guy appears to be right-handed. Therefore I’d assume the iPhone selfie is not flipped.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 7
    ghidoraghidora Posts: 1member
    mike1 said:
    I would want to know which looked more accurate or natural. Everything else is subjective and open for interpretation.
    For example, on the shots with the Lego toy. Which looks more like reality when you took the photo? It looks like two different tables. Which is correct?
    Also, the lighting in the background. Are they dark blue or teal?
    How dark was the room when you took the pic? Is the iPhone darker than what the eye perceived or is the Samsung adding brightness that wasn't there?


    +1, I feel like this review and the last one just show iPhone xxx better Samsung xxx.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 7
    dws-2dws-2 Posts: 277member
    The cameras are the basically the same; it's a matter of how the software shows the image. Samsung applies a filter to move more of the colors into midtones (neither very dark or very bright) while Apple leaves more in the highlights and shadows. Apple's is more realistic; Samsung's is likely to show a better picture when things are dark (aka the dog and the sushi).
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 7
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,486moderator
    Drives me nuts when the front-facing camera flips the image around. Which camera had it correct? They are opposite each other.
    I think this is to make the image not so jarring to the user. Normally we see ourselves in a mirror, which flips the image. It looks unusual if you see the image the opposite way. There are apps that let you choose either. Read some of the comments:

    https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/truth-mirror/id582877764

    A non-mirror image is how other people see you but it looks really strange when you see it yourself. The iPhone front-facing camera shows the mirror image in real-time but saves the non-mirror image. You can check by taking a picture holding your right hand up in the frame, the right hand will appear on the right like in a mirror. After taking the photo, the right hand will flip over to the left side of the image as that's what a normal photo would look like. Women check their make-up in the front-facing camera so it's best to behave like a mirror by default, though it might be good to offer the option in the camera preferences for people who feel adventurous or have a healthy self-esteem.

    You can tell from the logo on the shirt, the Samsung saved a mirror image.
    edited March 2019 1STnTENDERBITSwatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 7
    tzeshantzeshan Posts: 2,351member
    mike1 said:
    I would want to know which looked more accurate or natural. Everything else is subjective and open for interpretation.
    For example, on the shots with the Lego toy. Which looks more like reality when you took the photo? It looks like two different tables. Which is correct?
    Also, the lighting in the background. Are they dark blue or teal?
    How dark was the room when you took the pic? Is the iPhone darker than what the eye perceived or is the Samsung adding brightness that wasn't there?

    I agree the reviewer who took the shots also have the view of real objects. The reviewer should be able to tell us what he sees the differences of the photos with the real objects. Photography should start withe being able to match real objects. Then the best photographer can play with the shots. 
    watto_cobramike1
Sign In or Register to comment.