Apple working on biometric identification beyond Touch ID and Face ID

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware
Apple apparently isn't settling on just Face ID and Touch ID for biometric identification, and is continuing work on identifying a palm placed on a device to authenticate a user.




Apple has recently filed for a patent detailing aspects of its innovation in the field. Instead of using a hand-shape for a user to authenticate with, long seen in movies and television, Apple is proposing something similar to Touch ID on the iPhone or iPad, where different aspects of the palm's vein geometries are mapped and orientation is determined in real-time.

Patent 20190278973, filed in January, discusses Apple's approach. Similar to its patent on a screen-embedded biometric detectors, Apple is suggesting that a screen have multiple layers with the substrate, a photodiode layer, and a field of view layer above the photodiode.

Infrared light is emitted, and the controller determines the palm vein mapping from the photodiode layer. Palm crease data is simultaneously scanned with light in the visible spectrum, and is used above and beyond the vein mapping to enhance accuracy.

Apple's illustration showing palm identification on a device like an iPhone
Apple's illustration showing palm identification on a device like an iPhone


The patent also discusses using the in-screen detectors in conjunction with the Face ID TrueDepth camera. This would allow for multiple, simultaneous points of biometric authentication. It could also additionally map a user's hand movement during the process to better identify specifically where on the palm the device is mapping, without relying on landmarks previously identified during the palm registration process.

Apple notes in the filing that biometric identification can be used as a form of health monitoring. The company does not delve into specifics as to how this is done in the patent filing, but depending on resolution and accuracy, comparative vein mapping in the hand over time could identify swelling, blockages, or other similar health issues.

Apple appears to be thinking about using the technology as a passive verification of the user, without prompting. The patent application suggests that the palm identification can be done "while performing another task" when using an application on the device.

Further, Apple is thinking about using a derivative of the technology in an Apple Watch or Apple Watch band. The patent explicitly shows a user placing the palm on the Apple Watch, and the text details a sensor contained in a watchband as well interfacing with the worn watch. Similarly to how the heart rate detector works, this could be used to ensure that the user has not removed the watch since the last authentication.

Patent illustration showing user authenticating with palm on Apple Watch
Patent illustration showing user authenticating with palm on Apple Watch

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 11
    Nah ... the charm of Face ID is passive biometric authentication ... you can go into 1password and it authenticates you so you don't have to do anything special to gain entry to the app. If you're going to use palm blood vessel mapping, you'd use it on the back of the phone so just holding the phone would allow passive biometric authentication. This is how you would use the phone while authenticating. The sketches of the palm over the front of the phone is just to keep competitors from stealing the idea and implementing it first, which is something that probably happens quite often.
    badmonkwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 11
    And every time you sign in you’ll have to respond to Siri asking “Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?”
    mwhiteel_capitan_morgancommand_fwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 11
    Next time you go to the county fair, you can be dazzled by Madame Amazo and her high-tech, fortune telling palm-reading.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 11
    jd_in_sbjd_in_sb Posts: 1,495member
    Palm ID sounds much more inconvenient than Face ID. 
    command_fwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 11
    I will high-five anyone, but to repeatedly do it to my phone? I dunno. Face ID is good enough for me.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 11
    roakeroake Posts: 668member
    I could easily see a situation where you can enable both Palm ID and Face ID for additive security.  Also, there are far more opportunities with something like Palm ID to add a “poison pill”, such as lifting a certain finger up (or failing to lift it up) during authentication that would lock the phone, or perhaps even wipe it.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 11
    jd_in_sb said:
    Palm ID sounds much more inconvenient than Face ID. 
    One could easily see Apple selling this as a solution for security solutions. I think they’re potentially offering a sensible answer to specialized systems which cost vastly more.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 11
    Or it could be used as a way to permanently lock the iPhone without the passcode instead of having to press two buttons at once and holding them down for a while.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 11
    Rayz2016Rayz2016 Posts: 4,788member
    But what if someone whips my phone out of my pocket, then shouts, "Hey you! High Five!" and when I turn around with my hand raised, he presses the phone against my palm before running off.

    He now complete access to my phone!

    #HighFiveGate

    edited September 12 macguiFileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 11
    macguimacgui Posts: 1,519member
    What some people are still obviously unaware of is – security is inconvenient. And right away people totally unaware of this fact feel the need to be the first to badmouth something Apple is doing.

    Additional security is a good thing – apparently until it interrupts the precious convenience of our everyday lives. And no doubt they know Apple has failed, once again, to consider that maybe we don't want security and would be happy with just Touch/Face ID or even a four-digit passcode, and not make Palm ID optional. So it that's good enough of them, who would dare have the temerity to want more security. Silly Apple. Good enough is good enough for some, but not everybody.

    netrox said:
    Or it could be used as a way to permanently lock the iPhone without the passcode instead of having to press two buttons at once and holding them down for a while.
    That would be brilliant! I'm assuming you mean temporarily disable biometric access? And maybe give a little Taptic feed back that it's now passcode only.

    There could/would be some accidental triggering at first as people get used to it, but it could be done so subtly if needed as to be unnoticed and potentially unpreventable.


    watto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 11
    Yet another security feature to be turned off lest it be abused by the government.  :smile: 

Sign In or Register to comment.