New Set of Next-Gen Power Mac Rumors

123457

Comments

  • Reply 121 of 152
    [quote]Originally posted by xype:

    <strong>



    Geez, man! You're SO smart! Can I be your friend?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    No.
  • Reply 122 of 152
    bodhibodhi Posts: 1,424member
    That letter from the his 'friend' at Apple rings about as well as JD's old.."got him trashed and he finally spilled the beans..." stories.
  • Reply 123 of 152
    [quote] MOT is not going to be making the next gen chips, it will be IBM with a power4 core. <hr></blockquote>



    [quote] Let's just say a little bird told me. <hr></blockquote>



    [quote] Well, if the successor to the G4 is called a G5, then yes, it will be an IBM POWER4-core affair. <hr></blockquote>



    Anything you'd like to share, KidRed?
  • Reply 124 of 152
    outsideroutsider Posts: 6,008member
    Yeah! Hopefully some free porn! (for those in the know.)
  • Reply 125 of 152
    xypexype Posts: 672member
    [quote]Originally posted by GardenOfEarthlyDelights:

    <strong>Now, the question is whether or not he's legit. I doubt it. The true Apple/Mot employees seem to be clammed up tighter than my first girlfriend. This guy could be some third-party supplier, or an industry "insider" without any direct Apple ties.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Usually as a rule of thumb I don't believe anyone who uses too manny "..."s in his/her posts. I don't know why, but that "..." stuff makes the posts very cluttered and it seems like the people using it can not form sentances or even think in a, er, "rounded way". It's just lots of stuff posted between the dots and if he had really some inside info he could post it with a beginning, main point and a conclusion and a lot shorter than what he did. Besides, he throws around with numbers too much.
  • Reply 126 of 152
    cindercinder Posts: 381member
    <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=4663"; target="_blank">http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=4663</a>;



    Now they're saying that the diagonally mounted processor in those pictures was possibly an nVidia nForce.



    I thought everyone had pretty much established that it wasnt . . ?



    although . . .

    why would apple change the position of the chip if there weren't any more pins on it . . .
  • Reply 127 of 152
    airslufairsluf Posts: 1,861member
  • Reply 128 of 152
    More info from my freind, See his earlier letter (its on Page 3) for background info:



    "Hey ****,



    Things have gotten strange here. Apparently the higher ups have decided on the new term for gigaflop, SJ wants to call it a "Giga-Gasm"



    Some of the engineers have protested, wanting to stick with the techincally accurate 'gigaflop,' but SJ flies into a rage at any such suggestion. I was walking by his offfice and I heard him screaming at a marketing specialist 'I'm not going to call them flops! I won't market a FLACCID mac! I'm all man! All man, d'y'hear?'



    His new marketing slogan for the G4 is apparently up in the air, but i've heard a few of the following candidates:



    "Its Width that matters" (apparently refering to command pipeline width)

    "Intel will sap and impurify your bodily fluids" (no clue)

    "the G4 - like viagra for cyber-sex"

    "Steve jobs still has it"

    and

    "Its not the meat, its the motion."



    I can't say any more, I have to go, apparently we're all going to have pelvic exams this afternoon, Johnson came back crying from his, muttering something about SJ's 'cruel cold metal ruler.'



    I hope I make it to Wednesday.

    -**************** "



    Well, i hope he doesn't have a problem with me posting this, but it sounds like he has bigger problems



    [ 07-29-2002: Message edited by: Agent Cooper ]</p>
  • Reply 129 of 152
    programmerprogrammer Posts: 3,458member
    [quote]Originally posted by Agent Cooper:

    <strong>"Intel will sap and impurify your bodily fluids" (no clue)</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Nice Dr. Strangeglove reference.
  • Reply 130 of 152
    junkyard dawgjunkyard dawg Posts: 2,801member
    Dr. Stragelove RULES!



    Kubrick was the man.
  • Reply 131 of 152
    snofsnof Posts: 98member
    That, was a funny-ass post!



    "Intel will sap and impurify your bodily fluids" <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • Reply 132 of 152
    This is the last e-mail I got from my freind at apple, and I think it might be the last i get for awhile. He does have some insights into the case design, but they're more gruesome than I'd like to hear.



    "Dear ****,



    Its all over now, but I'm still shaking. Things@ Infinite loop were more than crazy this afternoon.



    First of all, SJ sealed of the Apple campus, and all radios were confiscated. I was allowed to keep my iPod (now I know why they don't put AM recievers on them). When it was time for me to report for my pelvic exam, I was scared stiff. The only thing in the room was a metal table, a mean looking doctor, and the new G5 case. Lets just say I found out what those holes on the front are for.



    The doctor wasn't cute or freindly, and he produced a metal ruler with "You must be shorter than this to continue working under Steve." written on it and an arrow pointing to the 5" mark. Its a good thing that ruler was cold, or I'd be applying for a job at Dell tomorrow.



    After we were all done with the exams, SJ came on over the P.A. system and let us know how things stood. P.C. users were preparing to take over the campus, we were to defend Infinite loop at all costs, and that the people who came at us may look like our own men, in black turlenecks and all. "Remember," he said as he finished,"Performance is our Profession."



    I went to see SJ in his office, he was distracted, busy scribbling on a legal notepad, something about "Purity of Essence" or "platform of extremists" or "Performance of Ethernet.." or something...



    That was when all hell broke loose. Conspirators against apple had started to over run the campus, hunting for photos of new PowerMacs.



    We spent the next few hours in the dark, running performance benchmarks of photoshop on the G5 Proto, SJ muttering about how women still sensed the power of his mac, and they still sought it out. When he was done, he sat, sweating, leaned against his desk, the G5 clenched to his chest.

    He kept saying "Performance will get up, I'll get it up. Only I can get it up... I have to get it up... i'm all man!"



    After he fell asleep, the campus was falling apart. The men who broke down the door weren't wearing dell uniforms, or Gateway holstiens. They were from Pfizer. They told me that they had an 'interesting new blue pill' for Steve, and that things would be normal again tomorrow.



    I need to get out of this place.



    By the way, Wednesday is off, I'm leaving town.



    - ******************* "



    I'll keep you informed of how his therapy goes.
  • Reply 133 of 152
    junkyard dawgjunkyard dawg Posts: 2,801member
    Funny, my friend said something similar. I don't think I want to repeat it here, because it's downright terrifying. Something about everyone one campus getting anal probes to identify the "mole". Steve Jobs performed all of them, he's said to have gone through a box of latex exam gloves--the sort that reach up to your elbow. The exam table was slick with blood and feces. I won't go any farther...
  • Reply 134 of 152
    snoopysnoopy Posts: 1,901member
    Guessing about new PowerMacs and processors can be based on what we hear or see, or what we can logically concluded from facts we already know. I think KidRed takes the second approach.



    We know Apple needs workstation power and needs it soon to run those high-end video applications. There is no practical PPC processor on the charts that can do the job soon. So this seems to indicate a custom chip is on the way. IBM is in the business now of doing custom processors, witness the G3 based chip for Nintendo. It does not take a psychic to figure out that IBM could make a Power4 based chip for Apple. Some parts can be left out, and other things can be added. It is custom. A choice of who should make a custom chip is no contest. IBM is more likely to deliver on time and to Apple's specifications. So it seems to makes sense. We just have to wait to see whether it is so.
  • Reply 135 of 152
    lol Mr. Junkyard.



    Does this mean I have independant confirmation of my freinds rumors?
  • Reply 136 of 152
    blizaineblizaine Posts: 239member
    [quote]Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg:

    <strong>Funny, my friend said something similar. I don't think I want to repeat it here, because it's downright terrifying. Something about everyone one campus getting anal probes to identify the "mole". Steve Jobs performed all of them, he's said to have gone through a box of latex exam gloves--the sort that reach up to your elbow. The exam table was slick with blood and feces. I won't go any farther...</strong><hr></blockquote>





    Rumor has it that during the ordeal Steve got a flash of light, a premonition, some would say Devine intervention, as to what the next "Break Through Device" will be... So far no one knows what it will do... my sources only know the name.... Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you "iPoop".



    No, seriously though? I heard that the next set of PowerMacs will be faster than the current ones. I hope I didn?t just violate an NDA or something else for that matter.

    :eek:
  • Reply 137 of 152
    frawgzfrawgz Posts: 547member
    Originally posted by Junkyard Dawg:



    Something about everyone one campus getting anal probes to identify the <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/obiguy/mole.wav"; target="_blank">"mole"</a>.
  • Reply 138 of 152
    lemon bon bonlemon bon bon Posts: 2,383member
    From Macnn boards...subject? Future/performance of 'power'Macs. Re: the fpu on the 'power'Mac compared to x86 counterparts...



    "The 7450 has four parallel integer processing pipelines but only a single floating point pipeline. Adding pipelines means a higher transistor count but also an increase in throughput as you've got multiple pipelines all operating in their own context. How do you think nVidia and ATi make such fast graphics processors? They certainly don't have a single pipeline everything is run through. The Athlon has three out of order fully pipelined floating point execution units. It is no wonder the Athlon totally whomps on the competition in raw FPU performance, it gets more floating point operations done per clock than either the P4 or G4. The only thing keeping the P4 in the race for fastest processor is its ginormous clock speed advantage. The G4 needs greatly expanded floating point capabilities in the form of more execution pipelines because a majority of software doesn't use AltiVec instructions thus are stuck using the single floating point pipeline and performing badly compared to other processors. Even if people hopped on the AltiVec party bus they would then be limited by the lack of double prescision FP math which oddly enough many programs find a use for."



    I thought that made interesting reading.



    I hope we get extra fpu in the 7470. Probably not.



    Maybe in the 7500? If one exists...



    Lemon Bon Bon



    ...and more from...Macnn forums...



    "I imagine that's why Nvidia, in their presentation and preview of their NV30, showed a migration from the 32bit Int precision for their 3D to 128bit FP precision in their chips (all multiple pipelines). Let's not count out the example of the Athlon that was mentioned, where in 3D performance, it usually stomps the G4 by a measure of about 2x or more (same with the P4 but not because of a superior FPU) because of the additonal FP Pipeline resources. The P4, which, in order to alleviate dependence on the stack oriented x87 FPU, added the necessary resources to do both single and double precision FP operations within their SIMD unit, something which Altivec doesn't currently do (I imagine that you could do DP in Altivec with some code tricks, but it would negate any benefit).



    So, the rest of the industry is moving or has moved towards double precision FP and multiple FP Pipelines within their products. Why shoudn't the G4/5 have additonal resources added to its relatively weak FP? Because you don't know what applications take advantage of DP FP (anything scientific or requiring precise numbers can benefit)? The G4's FPU needs improvement. It does DP, but needs additional pipelines to compete with other processor families. At the very least, Altivec should have DP added to provide a complete solution for developers that need the resources (and at least show a direction from Moto). As it it right now, if you need the precision, you'll use the one FP Pipeline. The same code on either the Athlon or P4 is going to run faster."



    Any thoughts?
  • Reply 139 of 152
    lemon bon bonlemon bon bon Posts: 2,383member
    From Macnn again...



    "What some of you people don't understand is that there's no magic rule that makes a chip able, or unable, to be used in a desktop computing application. It's just that some chips are more targetted at particular markets. The 74xx family are embedded processors that happen to be pretty nice for desktop applications. The 85xx family is a freaking system-on-a-chip that is really pigeonholed more into an embedded application. As I said in my last post:



    The only G5 processors, for ANY market, embedded or otherwise, belong to the 85xx family.



    All this proves, however, is not that the desktop G5 must be something else, but rather that Motorola isn't concentrating on the desktop market at all anymore with the G5."



    ...and if 'they' aren't. Maybe IBM will.



    Y'know. There seems to be an awful lot of smoke about Moto and Apple parting ways. Rumour sites are full of it.



    If the 'G5' 8XXXX (from Moto) is embedded only...in its current and planned incarnation...that leaves the 7470...which we kinda know about and the 'pulled from Moto's website' 7500... Which may be the 'canned' 'G5'.



    Which leaves us with a 7470 on Rio next year and not a 7500?



    Smoke signals. Difficult to read.



    I know the mods didn't like the irumour link but...it's another 'source', valid or not...saying the same thing. Moto out. Somebody else, presumably, in.



    Lemon Bon Bon
  • Reply 140 of 152
    kidredkidred Posts: 2,402member
    [quote]Originally posted by hjordis71:

    <strong>



    Anything you'd like to share, KidRed?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I have shared all I can without getting anyone in unnecessary trouble. From what I know (which may or may not happen) is G4's up to 1.4ghz are planned but possible that MOT can't deliver 1.4ghzs in quantity. New mobo with same processor, 333 DDR and new bus at 166. Scheduled release on the 13th, however having problems installing video cards and may not be ready by then. New case (possibly the one leaked has) air flow problems and vents were added. Same situation in January but with new mobo and faster G4s. This time next year IBM will take over in place of MOT with a POWER4-core scaled down desktop. Also, possibly an AMD x86 box that dual boots X and windows within a year or 2. These both are being worked on but not guarantees that the AMD box will be released for quite some time.



    Most of this is available in some form or another on the net somewhere and I don't know too many specifics and wasn't told many either for obvious reasons. That's all i know and I can't ask anything. This is the first time I've gotten something juicy and just wanted to pass it along without getting flamed as I have no history of talking thru my ass
Sign In or Register to comment.