Image Signatures - Vote Here

in Feedback edited January 2014
Should users be allowed to have image signatures?

If yes, note that such signatures would need to be less than 140x40 pixels in size and non-animated.


  • Reply 1 of 37
    jambojambo Posts: 3,036member
    Coming from a 56k user - Nay!

    J :cool:
  • Reply 2 of 37
    willoughbywilloughby Posts: 1,457member
    Yes Yes Yes!

    This is coming from a DSL user however. <img src="graemlins/hmmm.gif" border="0" alt="[Hmmm]" />
  • Reply 3 of 37
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    No - I prefer a simpler, cleaner interface.
  • Reply 4 of 37
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    only if FERRO's icons are the max size... although ferro wouldn't even use his icons in the signerature area anyways b/c he likes to switch them up depending on the subject of his post... now that I think about it, if people want to do this they can add it to their post manually like Anders and Ferro do...

  • Reply 5 of 37
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    I think memebers should be able to have them.
  • Reply 6 of 37
    applenutapplenut Posts: 5,768member
    so post count display is off but you're considering ****ing banners at the bottom of every post.

    great <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
  • Reply 7 of 37
    eric, read the rest of the frickin top 6 threads in the forum...
  • Reply 8 of 37
    cosmonutcosmonut Posts: 4,872member
    No. It makes things look too busy, and I'd appreciate a bandwidth break on my 56k modem.
  • Reply 9 of 37
    krazyfoolkrazyfool Posts: 129member
    I'm on a cable and I still don't like them, so no thank you.
  • Reply 10 of 37
    andersanders Posts: 6,523member
    Yes. But can´t you set a limit on the size of the file in kb instead of pixels and set it really low so we don´t have a problem with modem users (or at least a lesser problem)
  • Reply 11 of 37
    logan calelogan cale Posts: 1,281member
  • Reply 12 of 37
    powerdocpowerdoc Posts: 8,123member
    no, i like the clean aspect of these boards, and it's relative speed.
  • Reply 13 of 37
  • Reply 14 of 37
    pushermanpusherman Posts: 410member

    of course, i could go into something here about how all signatures are stupid because it just breaks the flow of information, instead of reading a block of text, you have to jump over (sometimes excruciatingly long/stupid) signatures to get to the next post. anything that disrupts the flow of information should be there for a good reason. Sigs aren't a good reason. IP Logged isn't a good reason. edit/reply buttons are about the only thing that can really justify being in the way.

    [ 03-09-2002: Message edited by: poor taylor ]</p>
  • Reply 15 of 37
  • Reply 16 of 37
    falconfalcon Posts: 458member
  • Reply 17 of 37
    cosmocosmo Posts: 662member
    I'm going to have to go with no
  • Reply 18 of 37
    Well, my position has changed. I vote no. And I shall change my sig shortly.
  • Reply 19 of 37
    I'll say yes on this one. However there should be limits. If a sig is too large, the mods should warn the person to make it smaller.
  • Reply 20 of 37
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
Sign In or Register to comment.