First iPod went from conception to shipping product in ten months

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV
Apple's development of the world-changing iPod was extremely rapid, details from former Apple SVP Tony Fadell reveal, with the claim Apple took less than ten months from first being contacted by Apple and the company shipping its first units to customers.




The first generation of the iPod was, at the time, an engineering and design marvel, but few details have been offered about its inception. According to information from Fadell, "father of the iPod" and former SVP for Apple's iPod division, the timeline for its creation was exceptionally short by modern standards.

In a tweet from Stripe CEO Patrick Collison researching about the iPod, Fadell gave an overview of events that took place in 2001, the year the iPod was made. Fadell himself was initially contacted in the first week of January, with a first meeting in the third week, but only started related work on the product by the fourth week as a consultant.

I asked Tony Fadell about the iPod timeline for my fast project page. Summary: . pic.twitter.com/mf0CfbAEtB

-- Patrick Collison (@patrickc)


Given the codename "P68 Dulcimer," the project had Fadell investigating "what is possible?" for the company. At the time, Fadell insists "there was no team, prototype, designs, nothing," with a pitch to Steve Jobs in the third week of March resulting in a green-lighting of the project.

Fadell became a full-time employee by the second week of April, then quickly found a contract manufacturer in Asia the following week. The first employee for the team was hired in the second week of May.

Apple launched the iPod in the fourth week of October before shipping its first iPods to consumers in the first week of November.

The rapid development and production of the iPod in less than a year is a far cry from Apple's current position. While it has far more resources now than it had two decades ago, the scale of its product launches and the sums involved force Apple into lengthening its schedules for a variety of reasons, including producing at scale and ensuring product safety and reliability.

The new timeline mostly matches up with an early recount of the iPod's development from 2004, told to Wired by Ben Knauss. Knauss worked for PortalPlayer at the time, a company Apple was in discussions with over creating an MP3 player. In his account, Tony "had the business idea" of making an MP3 player and creating a "Napster music sale service to complement it."

For the iPod's creation, Knauss agrees with the "early 2001" hiring for Fadell, but he was assigned "a typical industrial design team" of about 30 people, including designers, programmers, and hardware engineers.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    mjtomlinmjtomlin Posts: 2,673member
    Well you can’t really compare that original iPod to what Apple produces today. The iPod was basically made up of components that already existed (except maybe the click wheel), so having a short development time was possible. Plus, they did not develop the OS that ran it.

    Apple’s products today are chock full of proprietary Apple technology and components. CPU’s alone can take up to 3 years to go from blank page to fabrication. Not to mention when Apple does develop something new, it has to consider where it fits and how it interacts with the entire ecosystem of devices and services. The iPod only interacted with one piece of software, iTunes, on one hardware platform, Macintosh (MacOS 9).
    edited January 2020 StrangeDayswatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 9
    neilmneilm Posts: 985member
    mjtomlin said:
    Well you can’t really compare that original iPod to what Apple produces today. The iPod was basically made up of components that already existed (except maybe the click wheel), so having a short development time was possible.
    In particular it was the newly developed 1.8" hard drive, by Toshiba. This was a product looking for a killer application, and Apple recognized that, quickly locking up the rights to use it for the iPod.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 9
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,350member
    I still have my 5GB iPod. It needs a new battery, and the FW adapter still works. I wonder if iTunes still supports it. No sense in resurrecting it if I can't put some newer music on it. It might be distressing to see my tastes in music back in that day.
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 9
    macgui said:
    I still have my 5GB iPod. It needs a new battery, and the FW adapter still works. I wonder if iTunes still supports it. No sense in resurrecting it if I can't put some newer music on it. It might be distressing to see my tastes in music back in that day.

    I have an older 64GB one with the 30 pin connector. It doesn't work with iTunes anymore, so I'm stuck with music before 2008-ish.
    /my car has a cable for it, so I happily still listen to my pre-2008 music on it.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 9
    I used to link up my old iPods to the car through Denison’s IceLink. Phenomenal at that time: control of all CDs (=playlists) and titles through the car radio buttons. First, cable only. Later using Bluetooth. Imagine, at one point it even displayed track meta data..... 
    today, more or less totally anachronistic and clumsy back then (aka “about eight years ago”) it was wow. 
    how time flies. 

    Reminds me of “still rockin’ a pager?” ;)
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    The genius was in the clickwheel.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 9
    I’m generally sceptical of Fadell’s accounts of events. They generally cast him and his team in a favourable light compared to others at Apple against which he was pitted by Steve. He’s also struck me as quite bitter about Apple since his UX proposals for iPhone were sidelined in favour of Scott Forstall’s. 

    Note that since leaving Apple, Fadell’s Nest company has put out a thermostat, a smoke alarm, and rebadged an IP camera... in a decade. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    macgui said:
    I still have my 5GB iPod. It needs a new battery, and the FW adapter still works. I wonder if iTunes still supports it. No sense in resurrecting it if I can't put some newer music on it. It might be distressing to see my tastes in music back in that day.

    If you are like me, stick to 70s Rock and 90s Alternative and you can have outdated tastes all the time!!
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 9
    fred1fred1 Posts: 1,112member
    I still have my Nano and use it a lot since my stereo has a 30-pin connector.  Still going strong!
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.