Apple Card statements can now be exported as OFX files

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion
Starting February 11, Apple Card cardholders are now able to export their Apple Card transactions into the OFX file format and import their data into third-party financial management apps.




In January 2020, Apple gave Apple Card cardholders the ability to export their monthly transactions to CSV -- comma separated value -- formats. Now, they've added the ability to export files to OFX -- open financial exchange -- formats as well.

Less widely supported than CSV, OFX files are a highly-standardized format and are often used to record transactions vendors, customers, and financial systems.

For those who use the Apple Card for business purposes, they may prefer to export their data in OFX. Programs such as Quicken, Numbers, and Mint can read OFX data.
    To export your Apple Card transaction data:
  • Open the Wallet app.
  • Tap Card Balance.
  • Tap your desired monthly statement.
  • Tap Export Transactions
  • Select the format you'd like to export to.
Like before, you can only export data from a month that has generated a statement-- meaning February's data won't be available to export just yet.

One of the biggest complaints that users of the Apple Card have had is that there's no way to import their transaction history into third-party money management apps, such as Mint. There's a reason for this-- Apple's privacy policy. Apple is not too keen on third-party companies having access to customers' private financial data.

While cardholders still won't be able to give third-party apps direct access to their Apple Card transactions, they can manually export their transactions from the wallet app. Once exported, they can take that data wherever they'd like.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    Solisoli Posts: 10,038member
    It's hard to believe that this short term exportation on a brand new card from a company that had never issued a credit card was such an overly dramatic issue for certain people on this forum.
    edited February 2020
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 19
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 19
    Solisoli Posts: 10,038member
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 19
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Soli said:
    It's hard to believe that this short term exportation on a brand new card from a company that had never issued a credit card was such an overly dramatic certain people on this forum.
    Yep, some people get bent out of shape at the drop of the hat. The Apple Discussion Forums has several lengthy threads of users completely outraged that they cannot go to Goldman Sachs' website and login to their account with a web browser "like every other credit car on the planet." There are several threads with outraged Quicken users demanding Apple "fix" this "obviously rookie mistake". They are trying to form an activist revolt by asking everyone to cancel their Apple Card until Apple complies with their demands for direct downloads to Quicken. A couple of posters have become obsessed with forcing Apple to support Quicken downloads. I read the posts and shake my head.

    It's a freaking credit card, people! If you don't like how it works then don't use it. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 19
    Solisoli Posts: 10,038member
    lkrupp said:
    Soli said:
    It's hard to believe that this short term exportation on a brand new card from a company that had never issued a credit card was such an overly dramatic certain people on this forum.
    Yep, some people get bent out of shape at the drop of the hat. The Apple Discussion Forums has several lengthy threads of users completely outraged that they cannot go to Goldman Sachs' website and login to their account with a web browser "like every other credit car on the planet." There are several threads with outraged Quicken users demanding Apple "fix" this "obviously rookie mistake". They are trying to form an activist revolt by asking everyone to cancel their Apple Card until Apple complies with their demands for direct downloads to Quicken. A couple of posters have become obsessed with forcing Apple to support Quicken downloads. I read the posts and shake my head.

    It's a freaking credit card, people! If you don't like how it works then don't use it. 
    I like to export my data. I keep PDF records of all my financial transitions because I can't trust anyone else to do it. Because this wasn't an option with the Apple Card I simply didn't get one.
    gatorguy
     0Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 6 of 19
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  
    dysamoriagatorguy
     0Likes 0Dislikes 2Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 19
    Solisoli Posts: 10,038member
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  
    That all inconvenient but I only see 4 reasonable options here:

    1) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support CSV.

    2) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support MS's OFX file. I'm sure all the data is there.

    3) One can see about converting CSV to OFX or saving MS's OFX to an OFX file that Quicken and Mint can understand. 

    4) One can wait for GS to alter their OFX.

    Despite the silly sky is falling attitude people had at the launch they are clearly making this happen. It seems odd that they wouldn't have an ODF file that was tested with Quicken or Mint, but it's more odd for me to assume that they've decided that they're going to keep it as-is without support for those popular apps.
    edited February 2020
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 19
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member
    Soli said:
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  
    That all inconvenient but I only see 4 reasonable options here:

    1) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support CSV.

    2) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support MS's OFX file. I'm sure all the data is there.

    3) One can see about converting CSV to OFX or saving MS's OFX to an OFX file that Quicken and Mint can understand. 

    4) One can wait for GS to alter their OFX.

    Despite the silly sky is falling attitude people had at the launch they are clearly making this happen. It seems odd that they wouldn't have an ODF file that was tested with Quicken or Mint, but it's more odd for me to assume that they've decided that they're going to keep it as-is without support for those popular apps.
    Soli said:
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  
    That all inconvenient but I only see 4 reasonable options here:

    1) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support CSV.

    2) One can petition Quicken or Mint to support MS's OFX file. I'm sure all the data is there.

    3) One can see about converting CSV to OFX or saving MS's OFX to an OFX file that Quicken and Mint can understand. 

    4) One can wait for GS to alter their OFX.

    Despite the silly sky is falling attitude people had at the launch they are clearly making this happen. It seems odd that they wouldn't have an ODF file that was tested with Quicken or Mint, but it's more odd for me to assume that they've decided that they're going to keep it as-is without support for those popular apps.
    I am one of those for whom the lack of QFX/OFX capabilities was an issue. It's not by any means a 'sky is falling' issue, but it is more than enough to keep me from getting an apple card.

    I have several cards that give varying rebates, so the actual net financial benefit of the Apple Card is not that great. I use financial software to keep track of finances, credit cards, payments, etc and having everything in one place is a huge benefit in terms of convenience, so the the increased hassle and inconvenience of having a single card that is not compatible with my software is a significant cost to me that outweighs any benefits of the Apple Card. Is the sky falling? No because whether or not I have an Apple Card is not that big of a deal. People are complaining about the people making an issue over Quicken compatibility, but honestly I think the bigger issue is that getting an Apple Card is that big of a deal. C'mon, people - it's a credit card!
    dysamoriachemengin1
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 19
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  

    Actually, the problem is Quicken, not GS.  Quicken (2019 anyway) doesn't support OFX.  Because Quicken want to connect to your financial institution through their own servers rather than letting you bypass them.  Some financial institutions allow direct download of QFX, some don't. 

    Quicken only supports CSV for security prices.

    Seriously thinking of moving away from Quicken if I can find a viable alternative.  Or write one.
    StrangeDayswatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 19
    dysamoriadysamoria Posts: 3,430member
    I remember when, in the 1980s, computer companies would market their systems as revolutionary tools for “home banking” and record-keeping. Tandy (and I’m sure others) would have photos of the 80s ideal of a business man in his home office, sitting at a desktop computer with a modem attached, and a spreadsheet on the screen.

    It seemed like every “solution” was backed by a different bank. There were all these separate and utterly incompatible banking services and software systems, and they didn’t last long. People would end up eventually being forced to abandon their existing data (locked in proprietary file formats) when the product or service went belly-up, proving how short-lived this business model really was.

    I’m so glad we’re now in the future and everything is ALLLL better. /s

    I’ve been reading Arthur C. Clarke’s “2001” series of books and thinking about just how many future society predictions and idealist notions in various sci-fi stories never came... and are nowhere to be seen *coming*.

    My dad is amazed at how dramatically different the world is compared to his childhood. My perspective is very different: All I’ve seen is the endless churn of claims and unfulfilled promises of reliability and convenience.

    By my late 20s, I realized that the future was just going to keep repeating the past, albeit displayed via smaller pixels, on slightly faster computers with smaller components, marketed to us with bullet points showing marginally larger numbers. Hell, the dramatically smaller pixels didn’t even come about until... 2010?? (Ironically, the movie version regressed the screen technology seen on the space ship Discovery: it went from sharp text and graphics on flat screen displays in 1968’s “2001” to low resolution blurry CRTs in 1984’s “2010”).

    Every time I hear or read about people using Quicken, Quickbooks, various other banking systems, data export formats, and whatnot, I find myself glad that I don’t have much to track (I’m poor as dirt, once I’ve paid the four to six monthly bills) and especially glad I never attempted to run any kind of business. I don’t have credit cards, a spouse, a family...

     The actual future is still remarkably primitive compared to the future we were promised. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 19
    I wish Apple would release some version of this for people without Apple Cards - just an app to maintain their financial data.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 19
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member
    dysamoria said:
    I remember when, in the 1980s, computer companies would market their systems as revolutionary tools for “home banking” and record-keeping. Tandy (and I’m sure others) would have photos of the 80s ideal of a business man in his home office, sitting at a desktop computer with a modem attached, and a spreadsheet on the screen.

    It seemed like every “solution” was backed by a different bank. There were all these separate and utterly incompatible banking services and software systems, and they didn’t last long. People would end up eventually being forced to abandon their existing data (locked in proprietary file formats) when the product or service went belly-up, proving how short-lived this business model really was.

    I’m so glad we’re now in the future and everything is ALLLL better. /s

    I’ve been reading Arthur C. Clarke’s “2001” series of books and thinking about just how many future society predictions and idealist notions in various sci-fi stories never came... and are nowhere to be seen *coming*.

    My dad is amazed at how dramatically different the world is compared to his childhood. My perspective is very different: All I’ve seen is the endless churn of claims and unfulfilled promises of reliability and convenience.

    By my late 20s, I realized that the future was just going to keep repeating the past, albeit displayed via smaller pixels, on slightly faster computers with smaller components, marketed to us with bullet points showing marginally larger numbers. Hell, the dramatically smaller pixels didn’t even come about until... 2010?? (Ironically, the movie version regressed the screen technology seen on the space ship Discovery: it went from sharp text and graphics on flat screen displays in 1968’s “2001” to low resolution blurry CRTs in 1984’s “2010”).

    Every time I hear or read about people using Quicken, Quickbooks, various other banking systems, data export formats, and whatnot, I find myself glad that I don’t have much to track (I’m poor as dirt, once I’ve paid the four to six monthly bills) and especially glad I never attempted to run any kind of business. I don’t have credit cards, a spouse, a family...

     The actual future is still remarkably primitive compared to the future we were promised. 
    The problem is where trying to use technology to solve problems that are not technological in nature; they're human, social issues. The technology changes but people don't. They just use the new tech for the same dysfunction that existed with the old tech.

    I learned long ago that every time a new technology comes along, the promises that accompany it are nothing but pipe dreams and the reality will be different from whatever is promised. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 19
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member

    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  

    Actually, the problem is Quicken, not GS.  Quicken (2019 anyway) doesn't support OFX.  Because Quicken want to connect to your financial institution through their own servers rather than letting you bypass them.  Some financial institutions allow direct download of QFX, some don't. 

    Quicken only supports CSV for security prices.

    Seriously thinking of moving away from Quicken if I can find a viable alternative.  Or write one.
    Last I checked there were 3 financial software programs for Mac - Quicken, Banktivity and Moneydance. They all have their plusses and minuses but they're all viable programs. Both Banktivity and Moneydance support OFX import. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 19
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  
    Turns out Quicken only supports QFX, not OFX. People are understandably confused. So it's back to square one for Quicken users. I personally don't have a problem. I am a Quicken user and simply set up a manual Apple Card account and manually add transactions as they occur.
    CloudTalkinwatto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 15 of 19
    dysamoria said:

    I’ve been reading Arthur C. Clarke’s “2001” series of books and thinking about just how many future society predictions and idealist notions in various sci-fi stories never came... and are nowhere to be seen *coming*.

    My dad is amazed at how dramatically different the world is compared to his childhood. My perspective is very different: All I’ve seen is the endless churn of claims and unfulfilled promises of reliability and convenience.

    By my late 20s, I realized that the future was just going to keep repeating the past, albeit displayed via smaller pixels, on slightly faster computers with smaller components, marketed to us with bullet points showing marginally larger numbers. Hell, the dramatically smaller pixels didn’t even come about until... 2010?? (Ironically, the movie version regressed the screen technology seen on the space ship Discovery: it went from sharp text and graphics on flat screen displays in 1968’s “2001” to low resolution blurry CRTs in 1984’s “2010”).

    Every time I hear or read about people using Quicken, Quickbooks, various other banking systems, data export formats, and whatnot, I find myself glad that I don’t have much to track (I’m poor as dirt, once I’ve paid the four to six monthly bills) and especially glad I never attempted to run any kind of business. I don’t have credit cards, a spouse, a family...

     The actual future is still remarkably primitive compared to the future we were promised. 
    Are you honestly under the impression that novels and dates selected arbitrarily by authors were in fact promises made to you? How very odd.

    And what about things that weren't, er, promised to you in Clark's "2001", but are here despite this, like advanced medical imaging systems? 

    Myself, I view science fiction as narrative prose, inspired by technological imagination, rather than a concrete set of promises on a defined set of dates. Call me crazy...
    Soliwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 19
    MplsPmplsp Posts: 4,177member
    dysamoria said:

    I’ve been reading Arthur C. Clarke’s “2001” series of books and thinking about just how many future society pr u edictions and idealist notions in various sci-fi stories never came... and are nowhere to be seen *coming*.

    My dad is amazed at how dramatically different the world is compared to his childhood. My perspective is very different: All I’ve seen is the endless churn of claims and unfulfilled promises of reliability and convenience.

    By my late 20s, I realized that the future was just going to keep repeating the past, albeit displayed via smaller pixels, on slightly faster computers with smaller components, marketed to us with bullet points showing marginally larger numbers. Hell, the dramatically smaller pixels didn’t even come about until... 2010?? (Ironically, the movie version regressed the screen technology seen on the space ship Discovery: it went from sharp text and graphics on flat screen displays in 1968’s “2001” to low resolution blurry CRTs in 1984’s “2010”).

    Every time I hear or read about people using Quicken, Quickbooks, various other banking systems, data export formats, and whatnot, I find myself glad that I don’t have much to track (I’m poor as dirt, once I’ve paid the four to six monthly bills) and especially glad I never attempted to run any kind of business. I don’t have credit cards, a spouse, a family...

     The actual future is still remarkably primitive compared to the future we were promised. 
    Are you honestly under the impression that novels and dates selected arbitrarily by authors were in fact promises made to you? How very odd.

    And what about things that weren't, er, promised to you in Clark's "2001", but are here despite this, like advanced medical imaging systems? 

    Myself, I view science fiction as narrative prose, inspired by technological imagination, rather than a concrete set of promises on a defined set of dates. Call me crazy...
    Arthur C. Clarke was science fiction. The problem is the pundits and tech press continuously promise a stream of technological marvels every time a new technology is introduced (5G is the latest iteration.) These promise rarely to never materialize so essentially the promises made are science fiction masquerading as fact. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 19
    MplsP said:

    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  

    Actually, the problem is Quicken, not GS.  Quicken (2019 anyway) doesn't support OFX.  Because Quicken want to connect to your financial institution through their own servers rather than letting you bypass them.  Some financial institutions allow direct download of QFX, some don't. 

    Quicken only supports CSV for security prices.

    Seriously thinking of moving away from Quicken if I can find a viable alternative.  Or write one.
    Last I checked there were 3 financial software programs for Mac - Quicken, Banktivity and Moneydance. They all have their plusses and minuses but they're all viable programs. Both Banktivity and Moneydance support OFX import. 
    I use a Mac at work.  I'm not going to use one at home.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 19
    Solisoli Posts: 10,038member
    MplsP said:

    Soli said:
    I exported to OFX, but can't import the OFX file to Quicken.  Quicken tells me to connect with the financial institution.
    What about CSV?
    Quicken does not read CSV data.  Neither does Mint. It's one of the reasons people were perturbed about CSV inclusion and not OFX.  Unfortunately, the OFX situation is only going to get more heated because neither Quicken nor Mint is accepting the data in OFX format.  I think GS, in an effort to quell the masses, rushed the OFX implementation without proper testing.  Either that, or some software glitch is monkeying up the works.  @michelle_eris is one of a growing number of users who are finding this out first hand.  

    Actually, the problem is Quicken, not GS.  Quicken (2019 anyway) doesn't support OFX.  Because Quicken want to connect to your financial institution through their own servers rather than letting you bypass them.  Some financial institutions allow direct download of QFX, some don't. 

    Quicken only supports CSV for security prices.

    Seriously thinking of moving away from Quicken if I can find a viable alternative.  Or write one.
    Last I checked there were 3 financial software programs for Mac - Quicken, Banktivity and Moneydance. They all have their plusses and minuses but they're all viable programs. Both Banktivity and Moneydance support OFX import. 
    I use a Mac at work.  I'm not going to use one at home.
    That's what most Mac users who use Windows as work say.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 19
    ac2ofxac2ofx Posts: 1member
    Re: 3) One can see about converting CSV to OFX or saving MS's OFX to an OFX file that Quicken and Mint can understand.

     A converter is available to convert the Monthly PDF file into QFX that will imported into Quicken with no issue.
    edited March 2020
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.