Apple staffers suffer work-from-home setbacks due to security guidelines, travel bans

Posted:
in General Discussion edited March 2020
While COVID-19 is impacting virtually every sector of the tech industry, a new report claims that Apple is experiencing some unique setbacks because of its culture of secrecy and lack of access to prototyping tools and test rigs.

Many Apple Park employees have been working from home since early March, before the Bay Area and the state of California implemented shelter-in-place orders.
Many Apple Park employees have been working from home since early March, before the Bay Area and the state of California implemented shelter-in-place orders.


CEO Tim Cook first began urging employees to work from home whenever possible in early March to help combat the spread of COVID-19. Since then, government stay-at-home orders have mandated that, and Apple has also shuttered all of its retail locations outside of greater China and issued global remote work orders.

Some of the issues that remote Apple employees have faced have been discussed before, including snared network speeds and confusing security guidelines. Now, a recent report from The Information is taking a closer look at some of the difficulties Apple's employees are facing.

Security restrictions and Apple's broader secrecy cultures are causing some of the bigger issues. According to insider sources, most hardware prototyping has been brought to a standstill, since Apple's guidelines require those processes to be done in secure labs. Some staffers have resorted to drawing diagrams in the air, since they've had to leave sensitive components back at the office.

The inability to use in-office equipment has also complicated stress and drop tests, as well as any prototyping process requiring 3D printers or milling machines. Because of the issues, Apple has created new protocols to bring components from future hardware home with them.

Apple is also especially reliant on face-to-face meetings and internal file-sharing and communications software, though The Information reports that the company has been loosening restrictions on third-party platforms like Box, Slack or Cisco's WebEx systems.

Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. And while many staffers just aren't used to video conferencing with other employees, one major struggle is slow internet connections. One source, for example, lives in an apartment with four other people.

Apple has taken steps to make remote work more comfortable, such as issuing ergonomic desk advice and allowing staffers to expense office supplies and furniture.

The Cupertino tech giant's operations in China have similarly suffered. Although Apple's supply chain is normalizing and the country has largely slowed the spread of coronavirus, travel restrictions have forced Apple employees to come up with creative ways to work with its partners.

Part of the response includes an increased number of back-and-forth communications, including photos, with Chinese assembly partners. Some Apple staffers worry that this could lead to product leaks, however, and delays in responses can also derail critical fixes of hardware or supply line issues.

Many of Apple's supply partners are used to playing a supporting role, and U.S.-based employees communicating with them remotely have had to rely on low-resolution or grainy photos to issue instructions. Even the picture-taking process has a set of security guidelines, with tight restrictions on who can handle cameras and which computers are used to upload them.

Some employees also told The Information that they hope Apple will continue to allow flexible and remote work options after COVID-19. Even prior to the outbreak, some staffers have been "clamoring" for just that.

But while the coronavirus pandemic has undoubtedly been a roadblock for Apple, one executive at an Apple supplier said the Cupertino tech giant isn't showing any signs of slowing down. Apple has continued to place a steady stream of orders, echoing previous reports suggesting that the pace of production hasn't become sluggish.

Apple now expects to reopen at least some retail locations in the first half of April, according to an internal memo. Chief of retail and people Deirdre O'Brien also added that the company would be re-evaluating current work-from-home policies on a weekly basis after April 5, depending on a staffer's location. It isn't clear how the new federal guidelines on social distancing until the end of April will apply to Apple's plans.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 34
    VeleroVelero Posts: 4member
    Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. 

    Let's hope Apple catches the opportunity to turn FaceTime and iMessage from toys into real applications.

    ElCapitanben20lkruppITGUYINSDelijahgarlor
  • Reply 2 of 34
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,372member
    Yes, this pandemic is a huge learning experience for everyone from all walks of life. The good news is that big challenges are usually the catalyst for change, evolution, and adaptation that strengthens us as a species. 
    edited March 2020 russwRayz2016
  • Reply 3 of 34
    These issues are affecting many companies and employees. Many employees do not really have a home office setup. I have seen several co-workers and friends now looking for monitors, keyboards, mice, desks and chairs, etc. to just work from home. Many other companies also have similar issues with what can be brought home: heavy or expensive lab equipment, calibration of the lab equipment, how to test without access to big test machines, having access to soldering equipment for small electronics, sensitive material outside of a controlled area, access to test hardware, etc. Many other companies also have had issues with WebEx and Zoom conference calls. These video conferencing systems have probably ben strained way past their forecasted peak time. Also I have yet to meet a person working from home that is not having slow internet these days. A typical family is probably consuming much more internet than ever with kids doing online learning and both supposes working from home. Then everyone in the neighborhood is also similarly taxing the infrastructure bringing these systems to their knees.
  • Reply 4 of 34
    sjworldsjworld Posts: 94member
    Velero said:
    Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. 

    Let's hope Apple catches the opportunity to turn FaceTime and iMessage from toys into real applications.

    Millennials and generation TidePods won’t like that.
  • Reply 5 of 34
    hentaiboyhentaiboy Posts: 1,252member
    “Some of the issues that remote Apple employees have faced have been discussed before, including snared network speeds and confusing security guidelines“.

    And here I was thinking that only small animals could be snared...
  • Reply 6 of 34
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    Velero said:
    Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. 

    Let's hope Apple catches the opportunity to turn FaceTime and iMessage from toys into real applications.

    They aren't real applications, eh? Blocked.
    StrangeDays
  • Reply 7 of 34
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    semi_guy said:
    These issues are affecting many companies and employees. Many employees do not really have a home office setup. I have seen several co-workers and friends now looking for monitors, keyboards, mice, desks and chairs, etc. to just work from home. Many other companies also have similar issues with what can be brought home: heavy or expensive lab equipment, calibration of the lab equipment, how to test without access to big test machines, having access to soldering equipment for small electronics, sensitive material outside of a controlled area, access to test hardware, etc. Many other companies also have had issues with WebEx and Zoom conference calls. These video conferencing systems have probably ben strained way past their forecasted peak time. Also I have yet to meet a person working from home that is not having slow internet these days. A typical family is probably consuming much more internet than ever with kids doing online learning and both supposes working from home. Then everyone in the neighborhood is also similarly taxing the infrastructure bringing these systems to their knees.
    I agree. While my internet speed is as fast as ever, I have noticed that the conference call services have experienced issues, as you mentioned.
    This is not unique to Apple. Fact is everything slows down for everybody. Coworkers aren't nearby. More communication is being done by e-mail rather than in person. Everything just slows down. Of course, workers who have to stay home won't have access to their large tools and equipment.

  • Reply 8 of 34
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,286member
    Velero said:
    Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. 

    Let's hope Apple catches the opportunity to turn FaceTime and iMessage from toys into real applications.


    AI: - Please bring back the "thumbs down" function.
    lkruppStrangeDaysrusswjony0fastasleepRayz2016
  • Reply 9 of 34
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    The asshole troll crowd has been harping for years about Apple’s so-called ‘culture of secrecy’ and they never miss the opportunity to lambast it. Well, the company seems to have done okay with its way of doing things, hasn’t it. Quite well as a matter of fact, to the tune of a trillion dollars of value.
    sacto joejony0
  • Reply 10 of 34
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    mike1 said:
    Velero said:
    Some employees have found it difficult to use Apple's own consumer platforms, like FaceTime or iMessage, because they weren't designed for enterprise uses. 

    Let's hope Apple catches the opportunity to turn FaceTime and iMessage from toys into real applications.


    AI: - Please bring back the "thumbs down" function.
    Blocking works better. Trolls go away when they don’t get the responses they are hoping for, even negative ones.
    jony0
  • Reply 11 of 34
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    And here’s my pet peeve for the day. Bloggers are still using the term iMessage. You see it all the time. THERE IS NO SUCH APP AS IMESSAGE ANY MORE.  For several macOs iterations now it’s been renamed to just ‘Messages’. Why would a blog writer, especially one employed by AppleInsider, still be calling it iMessage? We’re in Catalina and iOS 13.4 now. Get with the correct name.
    edited March 2020
  • Reply 12 of 34
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member
    This sounds like a bunch of whining from a few employees who aren't used to dealing with special or demanding circumstances.

    The current situation has meant changes for how most people work across many industries. Deal with it.

    Complaining about a slow internet connection and one "source" shares their connection with 4 others?

    They work for Apple, can't they afford their own connection? They should get their own connection instead of whining about it. They should have multiple internet connections, home cable, fiber, LTE.
     
    This really just sounds like a bunch of whining in the article. This is only a temporary situation, deal with it, get the job done, don't anonymously whine and run to the media because certain people can't handle a temporary challenge.


  • Reply 13 of 34
    ElCapitanElCapitan Posts: 372member
    Some people here have the same type of reaction the Chinese had with the COVID-19 outbreak; ban, block, suppress and eradicate any criticism or discussion of missing functionality, performance or interoperability experienced for the holy Apple products. 

    Fact is, Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise or even small business out there, and excluded them from their testing and use cases. Unless it fits precisely in their shrinking and increasingly locked down ecosystem, shut it or cut it out. 
    elijahg
  • Reply 14 of 34
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    lkrupp said:
    And here’s my pet peeve for the day. Bloggers are still using the term iMessage. You see it all the time. THERE IS NO SUCH APP AS IMESSAGE ANY MORE.  For several macOs iterations now it’s been renamed to just ‘Messages’. Why would a blog writer, especially one employed by AppleInsider, still be calling it iMessage? We’re in Catalina and iOS 13.4 now. Get with the correct name.
    It's absolutely called iMessage and it's referenced in every Apple OS that supports it. The app is called Messages, probably because it used to connect with other platform services on macOS and because it still connects to SMS on iPhone*. 




    * (SMS forwarding to other Apple devices would be over iMessage so I wouldn't could that.
    StrangeDayselijahgfastasleep
  • Reply 15 of 34
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    ElCapitan said:
    Some people here have the same type of reaction the Chinese had with the COVID-19 outbreak; ban, block, suppress and eradicate any criticism or discussion of missing functionality, performance or interoperability experienced for the holy Apple products. 

    Fact is, Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise or even small business out there, and excluded them from their testing and use cases. Unless it fits precisely in their shrinking and increasingly locked down ecosystem, shut it or cut it out. 
    1) You really think Apple's ecosystem is shrinking? A year ago it was reported that Apple's installed based for iPhone had tipped 1.4 billion. You really don't think that has grown since then?


    2) It's foolish to claim that "Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise" when they're (usually) the world's most valuable company making a 1/4 trillion dollars a year and employing 137,000 people. I don't see how any of that is possible without using enterprise-level applications for their day-to-day business. If you honestly believe that Apple's data centers are just Mac minis or Mac pros you should google their data center efforts. They also rent virtual space from various vendors, like AWS and Azure.

    Or, perhaps you didn't actually mean that "Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise" and actually meant that you're upset that Apple focuses on  designing products for the consumer market, not for the enterprise market. You have every right to be upset by that, but you might as well get upset with Ruth Chris's Steak House for not having a low-cost fast-food option with a drive-thru or with any number of businesses for choosing to focus their efforts on a particular business model.
    StrangeDayssacto joejony0fastasleep
  • Reply 16 of 34
    ElCapitanElCapitan Posts: 372member
    Soli said:
    ElCapitan said:
    Some people here have the same type of reaction the Chinese had with the COVID-19 outbreak; ban, block, suppress and eradicate any criticism or discussion of missing functionality, performance or interoperability experienced for the holy Apple products. 

    Fact is, Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise or even small business out there, and excluded them from their testing and use cases. Unless it fits precisely in their shrinking and increasingly locked down ecosystem, shut it or cut it out. 
    1) You really think Apple's ecosystem is shrinking? A year ago it was reported that Apple's installed based for iPhone had tipped 1.4 billion.
    Yes the ecosystem is shrinking in reach.. it used to be that the Mac was more or less the most versatile, in many ways most open and desirable client, desktop, portable, small server there was.  Now it is an increasingly overpriced locked down, glued down, soldered down, thermal throttling display item for the special interest and woke. 


    edited March 2020 elijahglkrupp
  • Reply 17 of 34
    ElCapitanElCapitan Posts: 372member
    It used to be that we managed to develop, prototype, localize, test in geos all over the planet and get product approved for distribution – even do a major processor change when the company's internal communication depended on AppleLink at modem dialup speeds. I doubt things were less secretive back then. 

    Bunch of whiners now if you ask me. 




    lkrupp
  • Reply 18 of 34
    SoliSoli Posts: 10,035member
    ElCapitan said:
    Soli said:
    ElCapitan said:
    Some people here have the same type of reaction the Chinese had with the COVID-19 outbreak; ban, block, suppress and eradicate any criticism or discussion of missing functionality, performance or interoperability experienced for the holy Apple products. 

    Fact is, Apple have largely forgotten there is something called Enterprise or even small business out there, and excluded them from their testing and use cases. Unless it fits precisely in their shrinking and increasingly locked down ecosystem, shut it or cut it out. 
    1) You really think Apple's ecosystem is shrinking? A year ago it was reported that Apple's installed based for iPhone had tipped 1.4 billion.
    Yes the ecosystem is shrinking in reach.. it used to be that the Mac was more or less the most versatile, in many ways most open and desirable client, desktop, portable, small server there as.  Now it is an increasingly overpriced locked down, glued down, soldered down, thermal throttling display item for the special interest and woke. 
    1) Regarding the ecosystem for the Mac, what apps are no longer working on macOS? Has Apple made it impossible for *nix tools to be used? Have they made it so you can't install apps outside the Mac App Store or that aren't signed by developers, as people feared when they simply added a simple security option? If your issue is for finally removing Rosetta years ago and then finally removing 32-bit support then that's a pretty weak argument for apple "shrinking" the ecosystem. If you still have 32-bit apps that you need to run then don't install the latest version of macOS. That's your choice.

    2) Special interest? How the fuck can Apple, a CE company, make so many of the same device and you call them "special interest"? What is "special interest" is designing countless devices quickly to try to reach every possible market possibility. Dell will happily sell you a device.

    3) As for overpriced, that's a personal thing, but you can't reasonably claim a product is overpriced when they produce enough of them many months after its launch. The iPhone is overpriced and they're crazy for selling a $1000 iPhone which no one will ever buy, but then it's sold out for months after launch. Of course, then other vendors follow suit with even pricer items.
    StrangeDaysfastasleep
  • Reply 19 of 34
    sirlance99sirlance99 Posts: 1,293member
    lkrupp said:
    And here’s my pet peeve for the day. Bloggers are still using the term iMessage. You see it all the time. THERE IS NO SUCH APP AS IMESSAGE ANY MORE.  For several macOs iterations now it’s been renamed to just ‘Messages’. Why would a blog writer, especially one employed by AppleInsider, still be calling it iMessage? We’re in Catalina and iOS 13.4 now. Get with the correct name.
    iMessage, iMessage, iMessage!!!

    You get so upset about the dumbest things. Who cares what people call it? That’s what it was for a long time and how people learned to say it. Get over yourself before you give yourself a heart attack. 
    elijahgasdasdlkrupp
  • Reply 20 of 34
    All this Covid-19 situation of staying at home and working at home, makes me think that apple has a long way to improve it’s software and services. For a better remote collaboration between workers at home and also between families or groups. It would be great to have has well a good conference call software for the Apple Tv.
    russw
Sign In or Register to comment.