Wouldn’t a ruling in his favor have a universal chilling effect on everyone who invests in any “publicly traded company?” This goes against everything that being a company principal with fiduciary responsibility entails. At its core this is about trust. Who the hell would invest in a company that they cannot trust? Yes, there is always risk involved in investing, but without the existence of a trust relationship you may as well invest in a drug cartel.
Yep! That has always been the foundation of the American Stock markets: A basic level of integrity assuring all investors that they were playing on an level field. That kind of thing often does not exist in third world markets. It's essentially the same as a race track assuring betters that the horse race has not been fixed.
Comments
Yep! That has always been the foundation of the American Stock markets: A basic level of integrity assuring all investors that they were playing on an level field. That kind of thing often does not exist in third world markets. It's essentially the same as a race track assuring betters that the horse race has not been fixed.