Apple-sponsored NFC Forum adopts wireless charging spec amid 'bilateral' iPhone charging r...

Posted:
in iPhone edited April 23

The NFC Forum, an industry group tasked with setting global standards for near field communication technology, on Tuesday announced the adoption of a new Wireless Charging Specification (WLC) that could one day enable smartphones to juice up smaller consumer devices.

Samsung Wireless Powershare
Samsung's Wireless Powershare is based on the Qi charging standard.



NFC Forum's WLC relies on a single antenna to both carry data communications and transfer power to compatible equipment at a rate of up to 1 watt, according to a press release.

While not a significant amount of juice, 1W is enough to give a quick pick-me-up to low-power internet of things devices, including smart watches, wireless earbuds and styli. Apple Watch and AirPods, for example, are currently limited to low wattages due to their relatively small internal battery cells.

"NFC wireless charging is truly transformative because it changes the way we design and interact with small, battery-powered devices as the elimination of plugs and cords enables the creation of smaller, hermetically-sealed devices," said Koichi Tagawa, chair of the NFC Forum.

Apple is a sponsor of the group.

The WLC specification uses a 13.56 MHz base frequency and harnesses an NFC communication link to control power transfer, the group said.

Today's announcement arrives more than a year after rumors suggested Apple was developing "bilateral" wireless charging technology for what would become iPhone 11. Similar to a system used by Samsung in its Galaxy smartphone line, the technology was expected to allow users to charge iPhone wirelessly via a coil array, then use that same hardware to power other gadgets by laying them on the phone.

Analyst Ming-Chi Kuo in an investor note released just prior iPhone 11's launch said Apple decided against incorporation of bilateral charging due to efficiency issues.

Apple might integrate iPhone-based wireless charging tech in this year's revamp, though rumors surrounding an anticipated "iPhone 12" have not included such claims. If the handset does boast bilateral wireless charging capabilities, it will almost certainly operate on the Qi standard, making it compatible with existing iPhone chargers and Apple equipment like AirPods and AirPods Pro cases. Support for Apple Watch is less clear, as that system is based on a proprietary protocol not compatible with Qi devices.

In any case, implementation of the NFC Forum's WLC is years away, if Apple opts to adopt the technology at all. To do so would require design reworks for a number of major product lines that currently lack NFC stacks, and potentially tweaks or updates for those that do include such hardware.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 6
    seanismorrisseanismorris Posts: 1,624member
    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    CloudTalkin
  • Reply 2 of 6
    CloudTalkinCloudTalkin Posts: 916member
    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    Reminds me of the Car Connectivity Consortium.  Everybody and their mother is a member.  

    On topic: 1 watt?  That's basically a trickle charge.  I know it's probably more for convenience or emergencies instead of regular charging.  But 1 watt?  
  • Reply 3 of 6
    XedXed Posts: 2,568member
    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    Why would you want each vendor to choose different standards?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 6
    XedXed Posts: 2,568member

    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    Reminds me of the Car Connectivity Consortium.  Everybody and their mother is a member.  

    On topic: 1 watt?  That's basically a trickle charge.  I know it's probably more for convenience or emergencies instead of regular charging.  But 1 watt?  
    For the devices it's intended it won't be a big deal. BT headphones and (hopefully) AirTags should charge fast enough without killing the iPhone. Even an Apple Watch overnight would charge overnight just fine, but we'd also need for that to be on the Qi charging standard.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 6
    seanismorrisseanismorris Posts: 1,624member
    Xed said:
    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    Why would you want each vendor to choose different standards?
    Let’s get ready to rumble.
    VHS vs Betamax
    HD DVD vs Blu-ray 

    Wireless charging is about as boring as you can get.  Things need to get toasty!  I see your 1 watt and raise you 100 watts of wireless charging.  That’ll light a fire under the marketing department... not to mention the legal department.
  • Reply 6 of 6
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,168member
    Xed said:
    I was hoping for a battle of competing standards, alas everyone seems to be on board.
    https://nfc-forum.org/about-us/our-members/
    Why would you want each vendor to choose different standards?
    Let’s get ready to rumble.
    VHS vs Betamax
    HD DVD vs Blu-ray 

    Wireless charging is about as boring as you can get.  Things need to get toasty!  I see your 1 watt and raise you 100 watts of wireless charging.  That’ll light a fire under the marketing department... not to mention the legal department.
    To this day I winder if the names had anything to do with their failures. 
    HDDVD is clunky and nowhere near as cool as a Blu-ray. It’s a ray! Cool!
    betamax. Beta? Seriously?
    edited May 2020 watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.