Apple, other tech companies condemn warrantless browser searches

Posted:
in General Discussion
A coalition of tech companies, including a group that represents Apple, is calling on Congress to protect user browser history from warrantless searches.




In May, an amendment to the USA Freedom Reauthorization Act that would require the Justice Department to obtain a warrant before searching someone's browsing and search histories failed in the U.S. Senate by one vote. Now, as the U.S. House of Representatives considers the act, tech companies are asking House leaders to add those protections to the bill.

On Friday, Mozilla, Reddit and Twitter penned a letter to House leaders urging them to explicitly prohibit warrantless collection of internet search and browsing data.

In addition to the entities named above, advocacy group Reform Government Surveillance signed on to the letter. The group represents major tech companies like Apple, Google, Microsoft and Facebook.

A group of more than 50 civil liberties organizations also signed a letter on May 18 to House leaders to adopt warrantless search protections.

The USA Freedom Reauthorization Act would reauthorize key surveillance laws in the U.S., including some that date back to the USA Patriot Act in 2001.


Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    seanismorrisseanismorris Posts: 1,624member
    Where would they be getting browser histories from?

    Browser histories should only be stored on the device, which would require a warrant to access anyways.

    Maybe they’re referring to when you take your electronic devices over the boarder...  they are subject to search (arguably).

    Search history is saved by search engine companies and possibly on your device.  That would also require a warrant.
    edited May 2020
  • Reply 2 of 5
    Where would they be getting browser histories from?

    Browser histories should only be stored on the device, which would require a warrant to access anyways.

    Maybe they’re referring to when you take your electronic devices over the boarder...  they are subject to search (arguably).

    Search history is saved by search engine companies and possibly on your device.  That would also require a warrant.
    Every search you make is stored in the internet.
  • Reply 3 of 5
    joogabahjoogabah Posts: 139member
    If we don't get freedom I want communism.  They can at least pay for my education, healthcare, housing and food if I'm gonna be spied on and manipulated by a huge military industrial complex anyway.  I thought freedom from this crap was the whole justification for putting up with the cruelty of capitalism.
    GeorgeBMacwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 5
    qwerty52qwerty52 Posts: 367member
    joogabah said:
    If we don't get freedom I want communism.  They can at least pay for my education, healthcare, housing and food if I'm gonna be spied on and manipulated by a huge military industrial complex anyway.  I thought freedom from this crap was the whole justification for putting up with the cruelty of capitalism.
    You really don’t know, what you are talking about....
  • Reply 5 of 5
    GeorgeBMacGeorgeBMac Posts: 11,421member
    joogabah said:
    If we don't get freedom I want communism.  They can at least pay for my education, healthcare, housing and food if I'm gonna be spied on and manipulated by a huge military industrial complex anyway.  I thought freedom from this crap was the whole justification for putting up with the cruelty of capitalism.

    1)  You aren't talking about Communism but Socialism.   Socialism is an economic system that can run under either a democracy or an autocracy.

    2)  The primary benefit of democracy is not freedom but the ability of the people to choose their leaders.   It doesn't mean that they will choose wisely (you only have to look at the current example to see that!).  Nor does it mean the leadership will be any better than that of an autocracy.   It only means that, theoretically, the people get to choose their leaders.   But even that is shaky:   Here we are dealing with gerrymandering (where leaders pick their voters), voter suppression by multiple means, and an organized disinformation campaign run by Russia and right wing media.   And soon we are likely to see, for the first time, that the loser of a major election gets to declare the election null and void.
Sign In or Register to comment.