US House committee pushes Apple CEO Tim Cook to testify in big tech probe

AppleInsider

The U.S. House Judiciary Committee this week sent letters to Apple, Alphabet, Amazon and Facebook asking whether their CEOs plan to participate in a series of antitrust hearings slated for July.

With the correspondence, antitrust investigators are pressing executives to testify on their own accord as part of a probe into the business dealings of Silicon Valley tech giants, Axios reports.

The letters raise the specter of potential subpoenas for testimony and document production in cases of noncompliance, the report said. Lawmakers have for months urged executives to testify on behalf of their respective companies as part of a review process that could inform changes to U.S. antitrust law.

"These are documents that are essential to complete our ongoing, bipartisan investigation of the digital marketplace," subcommittee chairman David Cicilline said in a statement. "This is the appropriate process to secure their production."

Cicilline and the House Antitrust Subcommittee announced a bipartisan investigation into "platform gatekeepers" and "dominant" tech firms last year. At the time, specific companies were not mentioned by name, but it was later revealed that the probe targets Apple, Alphabet, Amazon and Facebook.

A similar letter requesting relevant documentation was furnished to companies in September. Apple's Cook was personally asked to provide evidence relating to its App Store business, so-called "Sherlocking" of third-party apps and systemic removal of parental control apps, among other topics.

The companies began to submit documents related to the probe in October, though the process is far from complete.

Augmenting the government review is testimony from third-party companies that allege subjugation by big tech entities. Tile, for example, spoke out against Apple's widely rumored "AirTags" object tracking solution last September.

Tile claims Apple took action against the smaller firm by stopping sale of its products in Apple Stores and crippling location tracking functionality in iOS. Apple also poached a Tile engineer as "AirTags" rumors mounted, suggesting the iPhone maker is readying a competing device.

Other firms, like Luna Display, argue Apple Sherlocked, or adopted, features and software capabilities introduced by third-party developers for integration in iOS and other first-party operating systems.

Music streaming powerhouse Spotify, a regular critic of Apple's App Store policies, was also asked for input on the tech giant's business structure. Spotify founder Daniel Ek previously said Apple "gives themselves unfair advantages at every turn," noting App Store regulations like purchase and subscription fees.

The House Judiciary Committee investigation is one of a handful of government probes into tech companies and their business operations. The U.S. Justice Department, the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general are looking into claims of monopolization, price fixing, anticompetitive practices and more.

anantksundaram

Meh. 

Tell them to get lost. Nicely, of course. 

badmonk

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

DAalseth

However justified this might have been when it was first suggested, we are in the middle of political silly season. The hearings will be populated by partisans trying to score points for their side. Nothing good can come from this. It will be all posturing for sound bites.

Dogperson

badmonk said:

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

Can I like this x100?

SpamSandwich

badmonk said:

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

Are you unfamiliar with retail sales? Every large retailer knows exactly what is selling and subsequently makes their own knockoff generic or store brand version of the same thing. This is not remotely new to retail and Amazon doing it is no different.

SpamSandwich

DAalseth said:

However justified this might have been when it was first suggested, we are in the middle of political silly season. The hearings will be populated by partisans trying to score points for their side. Nothing good can come from this. It will be all posturing for sound bites.

This goes beyond the Silly Season. Anytime the Federal government seeks to interfere in free markets (and what can really be considered “free market” these days anyway?) it’s a bad thing.

badmonk

SpamSandwich said:

badmonk said:

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

Are you unfamiliar with retail sales? Every large retailer knows exactly what is selling and subsequently makes their own knockoff generic or store brand version of the same thing. This is not remotely new to retail and Amazon doing it is no different.

From my perspective, the difference is the sheer scale of Amazon’s actions is monopolistic.

gatorguy

badmonk said:

SpamSandwich said:

badmonk said:

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

Are you unfamiliar with retail sales? Every large retailer knows exactly what is selling and subsequently makes their own knockoff generic or store brand version of the same thing. This is not remotely new to retail and Amazon doing it is no different.

From my perspective, the difference is the sheer scale of Amazon’s actions is monopolistic.

Watch for an antitrust filing against Amazon from the EU before the month is over. 

Eventually they'll get around to Apple too. 

gatorguy

badmonk said:

SpamSandwich said:

badmonk said:

I don’t understand why Apple’s “Sherlocking” gets such attention since the Apple ecosystem can never be construed as a monopoly.  But Amazon “Sherlocks” over the entire economy by running a market place that subsumes an ever larger part of the economy.  It does this by monitoring independent producers and sellers who do well in their marketplace and than directly compete with them by making the same item and underselling them (often at a loss) to drive them out of business.

How does this company not get broken up for it’s anti-competitive behavior?  We are killing competition for the sake of $40 microwaves and shitty $20 voice-assisted speakers.

Are you unfamiliar with retail sales? Every large retailer knows exactly what is selling and subsequently makes their own knockoff generic or store brand version of the same thing. This is not remotely new to retail and Amazon doing it is no different.

From my perspective, the difference is the sheer scale of Amazon’s actions is monopolistic.

Watch for an antitrust filing from the EU targeting Amazon before the month is over. 

Eventually they'll get around to Apple too. Every one of the big techs will get their turn.