Intel Skylake chip issues reportedly tipping point in Apple's silicon switch
A former Intel engineer claims that Apple is ditching x86 processors for Apple silicon because of the "bad quality assurance of Skylake."

Credit: Intel
At its WWDC 2020 keynote, Apple announced a massive two-year transition away from Intel processors in Mac to Apple silicon. Although Apple said the switch is more about performance and platform consolidation, at least one former Intel staffer thinks it's because of issues with Intel's chips.
Former Intel principal engineer François Piednoël said that the quality assurance of the chipmaker's Skylake architecture was "more than a problem," according to PC Gamer.
"It was abnormally bad. We were getting way too much citing for little things inside Skylake," Piednoël said. "Basically our buddies at Apple became the number one filer of problems in the architecture. And that went really, really bad."
Piednoël added that "when your customer starts finding almost as much bugs as you found yourself, you're not leading into the right place."
Apple's switch to proprietary Mac chips has been years in the making. And although it may be a bumpy road for some, Apple believes there will be tangible benefits to performance, integration and consolidation for both consumers and users.
But Piednoël maintained that quality control issues with Skylake was the "inflection point."
"This is where the Apple guys who were always contemplating to switch, they went and looked at it and said: 'Well, we've probably got to do it.' Basically the bad quality assurance of Skylake is responsible for them to actually go away from the platform," he said.
The transition to Apple silicon is expected to take two years, and Apple has taken steps to introduce emulation and virtualization software to help ease developers and consumers alike into the switch.
Intel, for its part, has promised to support Apple and its users "across several areas of business" for the next two years.

Credit: Intel
At its WWDC 2020 keynote, Apple announced a massive two-year transition away from Intel processors in Mac to Apple silicon. Although Apple said the switch is more about performance and platform consolidation, at least one former Intel staffer thinks it's because of issues with Intel's chips.
Former Intel principal engineer François Piednoël said that the quality assurance of the chipmaker's Skylake architecture was "more than a problem," according to PC Gamer.
"It was abnormally bad. We were getting way too much citing for little things inside Skylake," Piednoël said. "Basically our buddies at Apple became the number one filer of problems in the architecture. And that went really, really bad."
Piednoël added that "when your customer starts finding almost as much bugs as you found yourself, you're not leading into the right place."
Apple's switch to proprietary Mac chips has been years in the making. And although it may be a bumpy road for some, Apple believes there will be tangible benefits to performance, integration and consolidation for both consumers and users.
But Piednoël maintained that quality control issues with Skylake was the "inflection point."
"This is where the Apple guys who were always contemplating to switch, they went and looked at it and said: 'Well, we've probably got to do it.' Basically the bad quality assurance of Skylake is responsible for them to actually go away from the platform," he said.
The transition to Apple silicon is expected to take two years, and Apple has taken steps to introduce emulation and virtualization software to help ease developers and consumers alike into the switch.
Intel, for its part, has promised to support Apple and its users "across several areas of business" for the next two years.
Comments
I also remember that Microsoft took a beating with its Surface line that used Skylake chips. They had terrible problems and I think it was revealed (whispered anyway) that most of the problems were Intel's fault.
I just remember people waiting years for these chips saying "Next Macs will have Skylake" for generations.
I think Apple moving to ARM is going to have the same sort of impact that’ll benefit everyone including Intel.
thank you...
Apple Silicon was a waiting game, Apple weren't going to launch it until it would have meaningful performance in comparison to Intel's offerings. This means that every time Intel slipped, it would have brought Apple Silicon's launch date closer.