Piper Sandler ups AAPL price target to $450 from $310 on 'solid' June earnings

Posted:
in General Discussion edited July 2020
Investment bank Piper Sandler has raised its AAPL price target to $450, up significantly from $310, on Apple "holding up extremely well" during the pandemic.

Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider
Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider


Lead analyst Harsh Kumar, in a note to investors seen by AppleInsider, says that the most notable item about the June quarter results was the fact that the global coronavirus health crisis had "little impact on [Apple's] core business."

Kumar originally forecast Apple June quarter earnings of $52.9 billion, with iPhone earnings of $21.57 billion. Apple actually reported results of $59.68 billion and iPhone revenues of $26.4 billion. He also predicted iPad and Mac revenues of $5.5 and $5.49 billion, respectively. Apple reported revenue of $7.1 billion and $6.6 billion for those two categories.

The fact that the iPhone segment grew 2% year-over-year came as a surprise and was likely driven by the iPhone SE, Kumar writes. The iPad and Mac businesses also benefited from ongoing distance learning and work-from-home arrangements.

With all of that in view, Piper Sandler is expecting 2021 to be a "banner year" for the Cupertino company. Kumar suggests that the slight delay to the "iPhone 12" launch timeline could even be a boon to Apple's performance in 2021.

Although Apple didn't guide for the September quarter, the analyst expects continued momentum for critical company businesses, including better-than-seasonal trends for iPhone sales from the December 2020 quarter through 2021.

Piper Sandler notes that Apple's revenue for the June quarter surpassed its own expectations in each product category besides Services, which came in slightly lower than its forecast. Kumar estimated revenue of $13.5 billion; Apple reported $13.2 billion for Services during the quarter.

The analyst also suggests that Apple's four-for-one stock split will "make its shares accessible to a broader base of investors," even as its balance sheet remains rock solid and its free cash flow generation is significant.

Kumar is bumping Piper Sandler's 12-month AAPL price target to $450, up quite a bit from $310. The increase is based on a 27x multiple for 2021 on an earnings-per-share forecast of $16.53.

Shares of AAPL were trading at $410.81 on the NASDAQ, up 6.77% in intraday trading. Apple's stock price jumped as high as 6.97% earlier in the morning after Thursday's earnings call.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    That is just some abjectly clueless advising for their clients. Their target was $310? Good grief.
    hippoBeatsmdriftmeyer
  • Reply 2 of 10
    red oakred oak Posts: 1,104member
    If you actually listened to this clown, you would have missed out on a 33% increase in the stock 

    Almost all of the Wall Street analysts are clueless and worthless..   Almost all are perpetually behind the curve on price targets vs. actual 
    SpamSandwichBeatsmdriftmeyer
  • Reply 3 of 10
    mknelsonmknelson Posts: 1,139member
    red oak said:
    If you actually listened to this clown, you would have missed out on a 33% increase in the stock 

    Almost all of the Wall Street analysts are clueless and worthless..   Almost all are perpetually behind the curve on price targets vs. actual 
    My investment adviser tried to talk me out of an Apple investment in 2009. It was "too conservative".

    iirc the share price at the time was the equivalent of $19 a share (factoring in the 7-1 split). It's over $400 today.

    He was generally good on other products, not so informed on tech stocks.
    hippoBeatsaderutter
  • Reply 4 of 10
    slurpyslurpy Posts: 5,386member
    How do these assholes get paid? Why in God's name does anyone listen to them? I don't recall a single instance where Apple stock was low and they didn't increase the target, it's only EVER after a huge bull run where their clients would have missed out on a shitload of gains. Where were all these increases in March and April when AAPL was at rock bottom, and the stock was an obvious steal? 
    Beats
  • Reply 5 of 10
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    slurpy said:
    How do these assholes get paid? Why in God's name does anyone listen to them? I don't recall a single instance where Apple stock was low and they didn't increase the target, it's only EVER after a huge bull run where their clients would have missed out on a shitload of gains. Where were all these increases in March and April when AAPL was at rock bottom, and the stock was an obvious steal? 
    A fool (read investor) and his money are soon parted. Analysts are the snake oil salesmen of our era. They are bulletproof from lawsuits because they are only expressing their opinion, which investors are free to take or reject. I put them in the same class as your dentists’s brother-in-law urging you to buy whatever. 
    Beats
  • Reply 6 of 10
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    "Target is $310! I know I'm an analyst."

    *Apple reports another record-breaking quarter*

    "Target is $450! Am smart!"
  • Reply 7 of 10
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    mknelson said:
    red oak said:
    If you actually listened to this clown, you would have missed out on a 33% increase in the stock 

    Almost all of the Wall Street analysts are clueless and worthless..   Almost all are perpetually behind the curve on price targets vs. actual 
    My investment adviser tried to talk me out of an Apple investment in 2009. It was "too conservative".

    iirc the share price at the time was the equivalent of $19 a share (factoring in the 7-1 split). It's over $400 today.

    He was generally good on other products, not so informed on tech stocks.

    Yup which is why Buffet says to only stick to companies you understand.
  • Reply 8 of 10
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,450member
    mknelson said:
    red oak said:
    If you actually listened to this clown, you would have missed out on a 33% increase in the stock 

    Almost all of the Wall Street analysts are clueless and worthless..   Almost all are perpetually behind the curve on price targets vs. actual 
    My investment adviser tried to talk me out of an Apple investment in 2009. It was "too conservative".

    iirc the share price at the time was the equivalent of $19 a share (factoring in the 7-1 split). It's over $400 today.

    He was generally good on other products, not so informed on tech stocks.
    Yep. My UBS rep when I had funds there was like "I see you're heavy into Apple. They're a media darling, but have you heard of this other company called Qualcomm?" /eyeroll
    Beats
  • Reply 9 of 10
    Rayz2016Rayz2016 Posts: 6,957member
    “Up until today, I’d never considered hindsight as a career, but now …”

  • Reply 10 of 10
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    mknelson said:
    red oak said:
    If you actually listened to this clown, you would have missed out on a 33% increase in the stock 

    Almost all of the Wall Street analysts are clueless and worthless..   Almost all are perpetually behind the curve on price targets vs. actual 
    My investment adviser tried to talk me out of an Apple investment in 2009. It was "too conservative".

    iirc the share price at the time was the equivalent of $19 a share (factoring in the 7-1 split). It's over $400 today.

    He was generally good on other products, not so informed on tech stocks.
    Yep. My UBS rep when I had funds there was like "I see you're heavy into Apple. They're a media darling, but have you heard of this other company called Qualcomm?" /eyeroll

    WOW......


Sign In or Register to comment.