Folding iPhone may repair display scratches & dents by itself

Posted:
in General Discussion edited September 2022
In researching types of displays that can be folded or bent, Apple is now also working on technology so iPhone displays themselves could "heal" the inevitable wear and tear.

Foldable iPhones could have displays that heal creases or dents themselves
Foldable iPhones could have displays that heal creases or dents themselves


Apple has been working on a foldable iPhone for at least five years, and it's also investigated ones where the screen can be rolled up. In each case, the issue is of making these screens work -- and not be damaged by the folding or rolling.

Now a newly-granted patent suggests a way of both minimizing damage, and of doing something about it when it happens. "Electronic Devices With Flexible Display Cover Layers," proposes mixing rigid and flexible areas for a display, and then also utilizing what Apple calls "self-healing."

It's perhaps this self-healing part that is the most interesting part of the patent. Unfortunately, while there are 147 references to it in the patent's more than 11,000 words, there is a lot of detail about what self-healing would do, and very little about how exactly it would achieve it.

"An electronic device may have a hinge that allows the device to be flexed about a bend axis," says Apple's patent. "A display may span the bend axis. To facilitate bending about the bend axis without damage, the display may include a display cover layer with a flexible portion."

Apple proposes that while the display could stretch over the whole device, it may be made of three elements. Two would be regular, fixed screens, while the third would be a flexible part that connects these together.

Detail from the patent showing where a hinge could be
Detail from the patent showing where a hinge could be


"During operation of an electronic device, the display cover layer for the electronic device may be scratched or dented," continues Apple. "To improve the aesthetics of the electronic device, it may be desirable for the presence of scratches and dents to be minimized. To help mitigate the number of dents, scratches, or other imperfections in a display cover layer, the display cover layer may include a layer of self-healing material."

Apple proposes that this flexible layer may itself "include a layer of elastomer," and this is the self-healing element. Elastomer is stretchable, but can be made to return to its original shape -- an analogy would be the memory foam in certain mattresses. Typically, that ability to return to a previous shape is triggered by heat, such as body heat from a person sleeping on a mattress.

"Self-healing may occur in the layer of self-healing material without prompting (e.g., when the self-healing coating is dented, the material of the coating may fill the dent even without external intervention)," continues Apple. "Alternatively, the self-healing may be initiated or expedited by externally applied heat, light, electric current, or other type of external stimulus."

Apple proposes that, "the display cover layer... include transparent conductors that form a heating layer" to start the healing process. "The heating layer may be used to generate heat in response to user input, according to a predetermined schedule, or when the electronic device is charging," says Apple.

The patent does attempt to cover all possible situations, so for instance it is careful to specify that this technology could be used in everything from "a computing device such as a laptop computer," through phones, and even "a smaller device such as a wrist-watch device, a pendant device, a wearable or miniature device of other types."

It also says that the display could be in this configuration of two rigid elements with a flexible one in between, but it could also be a single display. In all of the descriptions, though, the idea is that the display would be made up of multiple layers.

"[It] may have an outermost layer formed from clear glass, transparent plastic, sapphire, or other transparent materials that serve as a protective layer for thin-film transistor circuitry and other display structures," says Apple. "The outer display layer may sometimes be referred to as a display cover layer."

One possibility is a display made of two rigid parts and one flexible element between them
One possibility is a display made of two rigid parts and one flexible element between them


Some layers would act as the actual display, while others would be there to protect that screen -- and particularly so when it's being bent. "[A] device may be folded (bent by 180 degrees or other suitable amount) about bend axis," continues Apple, "so that display is visible from the outside of device in its folded state."

This patent is credited to eight inventors. They include Hoon Sik Kim and Paul S. Drzaic, both of whom have previously been granted a related patent regarding how a folded iPhone could display notifications while shut.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    That self-healing is surely not limited to a foldable device or is it the 'straightening out' after being folded that is part of that process?
  • Reply 2 of 8
    longpathlongpath Posts: 393member
    MacPro said:
    That self-healing is surely not limited to a foldable device or is it the 'straightening out' after being folded that is part of that process?
    If I follow their intent correctly, it would the use of a thermo-softening elastomer (elastic polymer), which, as pointed out in the latter portion of the article is, applicable to “a computing device such as a laptop computer," through phones, and even "a smaller device such as a wrist-watch device, a pendant device, a wearable or miniature device of other types." The question is whether the aggregate ability to heal is better in a particular application than using a harder material that resists the scratching altogether. As this isn’t viable in a flexible component, this is how they came up with it. That being said, if the implemented version proves to be superior to a hard coating in dealing with normal wear & tear, then I could see this replacing hard coatings in some applications, even though the coated components may not need to flex. Indeed, I could envision such technology implemented in Project Titan, for windshields, lamp covers (headlights & signals), camera covers for self driving technology, and even for paint, with the advantage in that last scenario that a proper implementation would restore the paint while the car warmed in the sun during the warmer half of the year.
    MacPro
  • Reply 3 of 8
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,363member
    Incorporating the self-healing qualities into eyewear would be a very big deal. Folding phones, eh, wait and see.
  • Reply 4 of 8
    applguyapplguy Posts: 235member
    There are a number of self healing coatings. I am most familiar with thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) based paint protection films (PPF) primarily used to protect automotive paint from rock chips and scratches. (Work in R&D for PPF coating and manufacturing company.) The base TPU film is 175 microns (7 mil, 0.007”) thick and has a thin (13 micron, 0.5 mil, 0.0005”) self healing urethane coating applied to it. These films are optically clear and nearly invisible when installed. Some self heal with heat, others heal at room temperature. I have used these protection films on my iDevices since the ip3gs to protect both the back and screen. 

    There are a couple of negative with these films:
    1. While optically clear they are typically not perfectly smooth resulting in some level of optical distortion when applied to a transparent substrate.
    2. TPU films are soft and prone to impressions with any prolonged contact (think keys pressing against phone in your pocket.) Impressions are caused by the PPF TPU being soft and thick. Thinner self healing urethane coatings or when applied directly to a smooth surface may result in  a smoother surface.
    3. Urethane is porous and prone to staining. (Can be mitigated with a hard coat but that reduces the self-healing properties.)
    4. No anti-reflective properties. Visible reflection is about the same as glass, 8%.
    edited October 2020 FileMakerFeller
  • Reply 5 of 8
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    dewme said:
    Incorporating the self-healing qualities into eyewear would be a very big deal. Folding phones, eh, wait and see.

    I'm not fully convinced Apple has been working on a foldable iPhone. This may be a new invention. Samsung and Huawei are copying it wrong.
  • Reply 6 of 8
    Beats said:
    dewme said:
    Incorporating the self-healing qualities into eyewear would be a very big deal. Folding phones, eh, wait and see.

    I'm not fully convinced Apple has been working on a foldable iPhone. This may be a new invention. Samsung and Huawei are copying it wrong.
    Sure ... just like they copied phablets, stylus support, OLED, curved screens, customizable home screens, widgets, NFC, mobile payments, wireless charging, true wireless earbuds, smart watches, TV boxes with app stores, small tablets, detachable keyboards with trackpads, smart speakers, cheaper devices made with near-premium parts like the iPad Mini and iPhone SE (first done by Google Nexus and the Google run Moto X and then by OnePlus), 4G support, 5G support and the million other things that Apple adopted years after it was first popularized by Samsung (or Google and Samsung). An exception is true wireless earbuds, as AirPods came out only months after Samsung's version instead of years. Google even issued their own version of an Apple Card way back in 2013

    By contrast the only significant idea that Samsung - and Android generally - has gotten from Apple the past 5 years is removing the headphone jack. (Even that had already been done by Android devices before, just not Google or Samsung ones.) And even that is only done for flagship phones ... cheaper devices like the Pixel 4A and the Samsung A and M lines still have them. Samsung ignored and mocked Force Touch (Google implemented it via software just to show that it could be done, then abandoned it) and Face ID and has done the opposite of AirPods with their earbud design, for instance. As for the rest there really hasn't been anything to copy because beyond those Apple hasn't done anything "new" in years. Unless you want to count stuff with services like Apple Arcade, Apple TV+ and Fitness+ which Samsung is never going to do because services aren't their thing (if anything they are cutting back on services and have a billion+ agreement to promote Microsoft's services on their hardware instead). Oh and the Apple TV+ and Fitness+ names? Their similarity to Disney+ - which launched about the same time and was a massive success - is a total coincidence right? By contrast Google is naming their Android TV relaunch after their failed Google TV idea from 10 years ago.

    So no, Samsung and the rest of the Android space has long stopped copying Apple ... because Apple has long stopped coming out with their own original ideas worth copying in the first place. 
  • Reply 7 of 8
    cloudguy said:
    Beats said:
    dewme said:
    Incorporating the self-healing qualities into eyewear would be a very big deal. Folding phones, eh, wait and see.

    I'm not fully convinced Apple has been working on a foldable iPhone. This may be a new invention. Samsung and Huawei are copying it wrong.
    Sure ... just like they copied phablets, stylus support, OLED, curved screens, customizable home screens, widgets, NFC, mobile payments, wireless charging, true wireless earbuds, smart watches, TV boxes with app stores, small tablets, detachable keyboards with trackpads, smart speakers, cheaper devices made with near-premium parts like the iPad Mini and iPhone SE (first done by Google Nexus and the Google run Moto X and then by OnePlus), 4G support, 5G support and the million other things that Apple adopted years after it was first popularized by Samsung (or Google and Samsung). An exception is true wireless earbuds, as AirPods came out only months after Samsung's version instead of years. Google even issued their own version of an Apple Card way back in 2013

    By contrast the only significant idea that Samsung - and Android generally - has gotten from Apple the past 5 years is removing the headphone jack. (Even that had already been done by Android devices before, just not Google or Samsung ones.) And even that is only done for flagship phones ... cheaper devices like the Pixel 4A and the Samsung A and M lines still have them. Samsung ignored and mocked Force Touch (Google implemented it via software just to show that it could be done, then abandoned it) and Face ID and has done the opposite of AirPods with their earbud design, for instance. As for the rest there really hasn't been anything to copy because beyond those Apple hasn't done anything "new" in years. Unless you want to count stuff with services like Apple Arcade, Apple TV+ and Fitness+ which Samsung is never going to do because services aren't their thing (if anything they are cutting back on services and have a billion+ agreement to promote Microsoft's services on their hardware instead). Oh and the Apple TV+ and Fitness+ names? Their similarity to Disney+ - which launched about the same time and was a massive success - is a total coincidence right? By contrast Google is naming their Android TV relaunch after their failed Google TV idea from 10 years ago.

    So no, Samsung and the rest of the Android space has long stopped copying Apple ... because Apple has long stopped coming out with their own original ideas worth copying in the first place. 
    1. Apple doesn't often bring "new" ideas to market first. They bring the best implementation of those ideas to market first - and those implementation approaches are then copied by the rest of the industry
    2. The "plus" designator was used by Apple for the iPhone 6 range long before Disney named their streaming strategy (or even had a streaming strategy).
    3. How many people have heard of, let alone used, the "Google Card" for payments? How successful was Google's payments system, or Samsung's, or CurrentC? How many merchants (or their banks) support anything other than Apple Pay outside of the older Visa, Mastercard, etc systems?

    Apple is in a position where it can drive the adoption of technologies in consumer-accessible devices. It's been doing that for a very long time. Google can do it to some extent with the nerd crowd, Samsung has its home country devotees but where Samsung really shines is developing components for those consumer-accessible devices. Apple looks at the implications of an idea, forecasts demand and potential profits, develops its version of the ideal implementation and iterates for decades on polishing the user experience. Google can't even concentrate on a single messaging service.

    Maybe Samsung et al. need to get the significant idea from Apple that it's worth concentrating on the long-term implications of everything that's being brought to market. It's not exactly a secret.
  • Reply 8 of 8
    This patent is pure BS and it's shenanigans like this that devalue the patent system. Provide concrete details about the implementation and you'll get the protection that a patent affords, prevaricate about maybe using this, that or the other and you don't have anything worth protecting.

    Train patent assessors well, pay them to do a proper job, and pass the cost onto the patent applicants - increased costs will likely slow the rate of applications to a manageable level. Properly-adjudicated patents will allow for swifter processing in the courts, injunctions can be granted and rolled back more swiftly and the morally-dubious business practice of copying and then mounting an aggressive legal defence will become a higher-risk tactic.
Sign In or Register to comment.