iPhone 12, HomePod mini, record-breaking Mac sales - October 2020 in review

Posted:
in General Discussion edited December 2020
It was the month we had been waiting for, as the new iPhone 12 range was finally announced, and then was eventually shipped. Or half of it, anyway.

October 2020 L-R: iPhone 12 Pro with Magsafe; HomePod mini; iPad Air with Touch ID
October 2020 L-R: iPhone 12 Pro with Magsafe; HomePod mini; iPad Air with Touch ID


Apple had failed to bring out its new iPhones on schedule in September, yet in October 2020, it was still able to announce earnings of $64.7 billion. It must be doing something right, and the pretty much universal consensus is that it has continued to do so with the new iPhone 12, iPhone 12 mini, iPhone 12 Pro, and iPhone 12 Pro Max.

Announced on October 13, Apple's new iPhone launch had very much that was unlike any previous year. That started with how the launch was done with another supremely well made video -- seriously, the Emmys should add a category for Best Performance by a Tech Executive in a Launch Promotional Series or Mini-Series.

Then this time Apple launched four new iPhones instead of the usual three. And perhaps most significantly in these coronavirus times, it carefully altered the usual mix of features and price.

With the new iPhones, plus with the iPhone SE and how Apple retains last year's iPhone 11 Pro, the company had again got a phone for just about every price point. Apple does this very well, but usually it also makes much clearer and obvious distinctions between its various models, and so much of that was gone this year.

Now the whole iPhone 12 range offers features that might previously have been reserved for the higher-end Pro models.

They all have 5G, they now all lack a power adapter and earbuds, and all have the new Ceramic Shield on their front display glass. Speaking of which, there are tiny differences between those displays, but every model has an OLED Super Retina XDR display.

All four new iPhones have the same design, too, which brings the iPad Pro's flat edges to each of these phones. That move proved to be so popular that Apple has got to be wondering what it can do with the iPhone 13 to keep up.

With choice comes complexity

In making the new iPhone 12 range affordable, at least with some models, yet keeping major features across every phone, Apple made it both simple and hard to choose what to buy. If you were brand new to the iPhone at all, you could now just buy any of them and be sure of getting an extremely good phone.






That's great, and it's especially great for the entry-level iPhone 12 model, but it means a lot more head-scratching if you're comparing the iPhone 12 to the iPhone 12 Pro.

Things are easier with the iPhone 12 mini, and the iPhone 12 Pro Max, although neither was actually available in October so if it were easier to pick one of these, still you would have to wait a couple of weeks longer than usual.

The iPhone 12 mini turned out to be smaller than this year's iPhone SE, yet contain a bigger screen. It's also the lowest-cost iPhone 12, even though many would've paid more to get the small form factor. So that could make it even more appealing than the iPhone 12 or the iPhone 12 Pro.

Similarly, the iPhone 12 Pro Max was clearly going to have the best cameras when it came out in October, and it was going to be overall significantly better than the rest of the phones -- and more expensive.

That mix of features, price and size did make these two iPhone 12 models the right choice for many people, but during October 2020 when they weren't available, they made that buying choice harder.

Or rather, it's made the specifics of the buying choice harder, as it made the overall decision to buy a new iPhone more attractive. And in October 2020, we learned just exactly how appealing it is.

A billion pockets, y'all

The analyst firm with the odd name but the good track record, Above Avalon, announced in October that it appeared that over a billion people were now using an iPhone. They didn't mean that Apple has sold a billion of them -- we know it long blew past that number -- but rather that at that moment, there are a billion people with an iPhone in their hand.

You can say that Android is more successful, and many people do, including Apple in its many 2020 legal cases. But there are countless different Android phones coming from myriad companies.

There's only one Apple, and a billion iPhones.

Steve Jobs with the first iPhone ever seen in public. There are rather more of them today.
Steve Jobs with the first iPhone ever seen in public. There are rather more of them today.


In this coronavirus year, that's at least in part down to how we reportedly have a deeper emotional connection to our Apple devices than most people do to most other companies. Surveyed specifically to see how brands were faring during the COVID-19 pandemic, MBLM asked people about emotional fulfillment from firms.

Apple came first overall. Using only results from men, Apple came second to Amazon, however as well as the top spot in total, it was also top of women's votes and those of millennials.

Separately, research firm Piper Sandler claimed in October that 86% of teenage respondents to its survey said that they have an iPhone. Then 89% said they intend to buy one. There was no detail over whether they meant they'd buy or their parents would, though.

Finally, the iPad Air 4 ships

There are also quite a few iPads out there, and it did rather look as if those numbers should swell because of the iPad Air 4. Apple announced it in September but, quite unusually, both kept us waiting and didn't specify a release date beyond next month.

Despite countless rumors pegging its release to every day you can think of in the month, Apple practically slipped it out in the end. Pre-orders began on October 16, exactly 31 days after announcement, and alongside the rather more hyped iPhone 12.






Just as with the iPhone 12, though, the iPad Air 4 came with issues that affected buying decisions -- although this time, all for the good. Over and over, reviewers, testers, and customers came to the conclusion that the iPad Air was the best iPad to buy.

It's such a good combination of features, and price, that it has become hard to see why many people would buy the 11-inch iPad Pro. Bringing the same design, very similar features, and better performance meant Apple was again offering far more than usual in the lower-priced option.

Which is also a fair description of the one other hardware product Apple revealed this month. The HomePod mini had us all wanting one, and then when it was announced at $99, we all wanted more than one.

Before anyone has even got to test it or hear it, the HomePod mini somehow became much more desirable than the original, full-size HomePod.

Not everyone loves Apple

October may have seen surveys saying we love Apple devices, and it may have seen Apple earning incredible amounts of our money even before we could buy the HomePod mini. Yet it was also a month where the company continued to be rather battered by criticism.

The now tedious Apple versus Epic Games dispute has continued with neither side offering much of a new level, and Facebook continued trying to make itself appear to be the poor underdog.

This time, "No Discovered Security Breaches in 0 Days" Facebook was arguing against the ad-tracking block that Apple keeps saying it's going to add to iOS 14. Facebook wasn't alone this month, as a coalition of publishers and advertisers in France lobbied their government to investigate Apple over unfair competition.

They maintain that every advertiser except Apple will require users to positively elect to allow ad tracking. Apple says yes, but no, because it doesn't sell its ad-tracking data to anyone else, so you can't really say it's the same thing. Facebook wasn't done with this topic in October, either.

October also saw the House Judiciary decide that Apple has monopoly-like power with the App Store. Apple objected "vehemently," saying that, "our company does not have a dominant market share in any category where we do business."

Or rather, Apple and its current management team objected. Ex-App Store manager Philip Shoemaker said that Apple had always used the App Store as "a weapon against competitors."






The House's examination of Apple -- along with big tech firms such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook -- was this month just one of the worldwide pressures facing the company. The EU in particular has Apple on what's being called a "hit list" of tech companies that it wants to apply stricter rules to.

That said, the EU's chief antitrust executive, Margrethe Vestager, is one of the voices speaking out against breaking up large technology firms. She's pursuing the plan to implement these more stringent trading and taxation rules, and thinks breaking firms up is a remedy with potentially unintended consequences.

One area we're looking at for consequences is how Apple may be affected by the Department of Justice deciding to sue Google. The DOJ argues that Google paying Apple billions every year to keep being the default search engine on iOS is a problem.

When 5G isn't 5G

Talking of worldwide consequences that, if not unintended, were at least not predicted, it was during this month that we really learned how not all 5G is created equal. If you're in America, it's likely that you're still waiting for mmWave 5G, basically the version that has all the speed everyone promises in 5G.

If you're outside the US, you might be waiting, you might not, but you may as well whistle for mmWave 5G -- if you want an iPhone. While it's hardly Apple's fault that 5G availability isn't better, it is entirely Apple's fault that it has reserved mmWave for only US iPhones. Now we know what the "iPhone 13" will bring.

Then even in the US, there were reports that Dual SIM users wouldn't get 5G on either of their lines. That may or may not be true, and it may be that Apple can fix it with an update.

None of this seemed to stop many of us from buying the new Apple devices. Around the world, customers lined up outside Apple Stores, and those of us waiting on deliveries soon found that demand was so high that we were going to be waiting a lot longer.

A look into the future

All of which accounts for Apple's earnings call, where the company revealed that it had earned more than expected this quarter. At $64.7 billion, that's more than analysts predicted -- but repeatedly, Apple also said that the figures were better than even their own internal estimates.

That probably didn't include sales in China, though, which the earnings call tried hard to skip over as quickly as it could. However, it did include what turned out to be a record for Mac sales.

During the last quarter, Apple sold $8 billion worth of Macs. "[This] was an all-time high for Mac in the history of the company. And not just by a little bit, by $1.6 billion, so it was a substantial difference."

Tim Cook kept using the word "bullish" like he'd just learned it, and maybe that's why he also took the unusual step of speaking more about the future -- even if only ever so slightly.

"Without giving away too much, I can tell you that this year has a few more exciting things in store," he said.

Tease.

He didn't sound as if he were talking of things we already know about, such as Apple Silicon -- and certainly didn't drop any hint about the AirPods Max.

One thing he definitely did not mean, though, was Apple One -- because he had already specifically announced that the bundle would just squeak into the month on the very last day.


Keep up with AppleInsider by downloading the AppleInsider app for iOS, and follow us on YouTube, Twitter @appleinsider and Facebook for live, late-breaking coverage. You can also check out our official Instagram account for exclusive photos.

Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod or HomePod mini. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider Daily," and you'll get a fast update direct from the AppleInsider team.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    FatmanFatman Posts: 513member
    Picked up the 12Pro, absolutely needed to upgrade, I love it, super premium feel.  Was contemplating the 12 with 128 to save some money but got a deal from Verizon and glad I went with the Pro with extra telelense. Watch a Pixar Disney+ movie on the screen and it looks incredible with 4k HDR (Moana is the movie I use to show off with - incredible animation/deep shadows and vibrant colors). Next year’s 13 will also be a killer - I assume they’ll keep same design but benefit further from faster processor, 120hz, more power efficient 5g chip, cameras from this year’s max? and possibly smaller/no notch - that will make a fantastic phone a perfect phone IMO. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 8
    However, comma,,,,,Apple have not been able to remedy first owners of HomePod with hardware failures, such as popping sounds and eventually quit working.....come on Apple
    pulseimages
  • Reply 3 of 8
    Fatman said:
    Picked up the 12Pro, absolutely needed to upgrade, I love it, super premium feel.  Was contemplating the 12 with 128 to save some money but got a deal from Verizon and glad I went with the Pro with extra telelense. Watch a Pixar Disney+ movie on the screen and it looks incredible with 4k HDR (Moana is the movie I use to show off with - incredible animation/deep shadows and vibrant colors). Next year’s 13 will also be a killer - I assume they’ll keep same design but benefit further from faster processor, 120hz, more power efficient 5g chip, cameras from this year’s max? and possibly smaller/no notch - that will make a fantastic phone a perfect phone IMO. 
    What did you upgrade from? 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 8
    bageljoeybageljoey Posts: 2,004member
    Fatman said:
    Picked up the 12Pro, absolutely needed to upgrade, I love it, super premium feel.  Was contemplating the 12 with 128 to save some money but got a deal from Verizon and glad I went with the Pro with extra telelense. Watch a Pixar Disney+ movie on the screen and it looks incredible with 4k HDR (Moana is the movie I use to show off with - incredible animation/deep shadows and vibrant colors). Next year’s 13 will also be a killer - I assume they’ll keep same design but benefit further from faster processor, 120hz, more power efficient 5g chip, cameras from this year’s max? and possibly smaller/no notch - that will make a fantastic phone a perfect phone IMO. 
    What did you upgrade from? 
    I upgraded from the 8, so this one was a no-brainer for me. I love everything about the 12 Pro.  (Incidentally, it’s my first notch phone—I’m not sure I get the hate. Sure I’d like to have more screen space, but the notch is better than a forehead.)
    My wife is on a Xs and she is loving my phone too—she was supposed to wait until next year; we will see if she can hold off!
    edited November 2020 twokatmewwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 8
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    Kuyangkoh said:
    However, comma,,,,,Apple have not been able to remedy first owners of HomePod with hardware failures, such as popping sounds and eventually quit working.....come on Apple
    Says the disgruntled outlier who thinks every single HomePod is defective
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 8
    lkrupp said:
    Kuyangkoh said:
    However, comma,,,,,Apple have not been able to remedy first owners of HomePod with hardware failures, such as popping sounds and eventually quit working.....come on Apple
    Says the disgruntled outlier who thinks every single HomePod is defective
    Apparently, HomePod demarcates that new status quo
  • Reply 7 of 8
    One wonders how an EU agency would proceed to "break up" an American company which is neither owned by, designed by, nor manufactured by a company in the EU.

    The very fact that they're talking in those term shows an amazing and almost Chinese Communist Party amount of chutzpah, projecting their laws well beyond their borders (like the CCP outlawing criticism anywhere for CCP actions in Hong Kong).

    At most I could see them prohibiting sales of Apple devices in the EU - though I'd imagine that this would be viewed with extreme displeasure by citizens in that loose confederacy.

    If Apple lost - and I'm not assuming that would: look at the EU's attempt to collect "delinquent" tax revenues in Ireland - the most I could see would be to alter business practices within the EU.

    Sorry, no apps on your phone: courtesy of the anti-trust division of the EU. That app is making your phone crash? Sorry, that was sold by a third-party app store the EU mandated be put on the phone, and that app store is granting dangerous privileges which are allowing it to corrupt your settings. Please contact the Epic Game store for support.
    watto_cobrasailorpaul
  • Reply 8 of 8
    One wonders how an EU agency would proceed to "break up" an American company which is neither owned by, designed by, nor manufactured by a company in the EU.

    The very fact that they're talking in those term shows an amazing and almost Chinese Communist Party amount of chutzpah, projecting their laws well beyond their borders (like the CCP outlawing criticism anywhere for CCP actions in Hong Kong).

    At most I could see them prohibiting sales of Apple devices in the EU - though I'd imagine that this would be viewed with extreme displeasure by citizens in that loose confederacy.

    If Apple lost - and I'm not assuming that would: look at the EU's attempt to collect "delinquent" tax revenues in Ireland - the most I could see would be to alter business practices within the EU.

    Sorry, no apps on your phone: courtesy of the anti-trust division of the EU. That app is making your phone crash? Sorry, that was sold by a third-party app store the EU mandated be put on the phone, and that app store is granting dangerous privileges which are allowing it to corrupt your settings. Please contact the Epic Game store for support.
    I like your post, but you are incorrect that the EU could force Apple to install a third party app store. For comparison, if the EU wanted Apple to sell orange iPhones, Apple could avoid that by not selling iPhones in the EU at all. They can't actually be forced to sell orange iPhones. Similarly, Apple can't be forced to offer third party app stores, Apple could simply remove all app stores including their own. Apple's iPhones sold very well before the introduction of the App Store.

    And if Apple did that, the EU would quickly blink and beg Apple to bring the App Store back as it was. If Apple had any nerve, they would request assurances before returning to the status quo which was unacceptable.
    edited November 2020 sailorpaul
Sign In or Register to comment.