Early AirPods Max teardown reveals massive drivers, strategically placed logic boards

Posted:
in General Discussion edited December 2020
Repair specialist iFixit on Thursday began its customary teardown of Apple's latest piece of hardware, AirPods Max, to find logic boards and large drivers fighting for space in crammed aluminum ear cups.

AirPods Max Teardown


As with prior Apple device disassemblies, iFixit kicked the process off with an X-ray of the new headphone model. Conducted by Creative Electron, the resulting image reveals what at first glance appears to be a spacious interior with electronics arranged in each shell's outer periphery. Upon closer inspection, however, allotted space within the svelte aluminum cups is at a premium.

Apple opted to incorporate both battery cells in one ear cup. How engineers counterbalanced the added weight is at this point unknown. The X-ray also shows the drivers' massive dual-ring magnet motor, Apple's "revolutionary" ear cup positioning mechanism, an array of alignment magnets, circuitry and internal screws.

A look inside provides a glimpse at two discrete logic boards, one for each ear cup. The identification process is ongoing, but iFixit found a number of chips common to both boards including an FPGA as well as what appears to be the H1 chip and power management silicon.

Apple introduced the H1 with a second-generation AirPods model in 2019. In AirPods Max, the chip boasts 10 audio cores and is responsible for active noise cancelling, adaptive computational audio and Bluetooth communications, among other duties.

The repair company plans to continue its teardown over the coming days and will assign a "repairability" score when the process is complete.

Apple debuted AirPods Max earlier this month as a luxury over-the-ear headphone that pairs the company's trademark minimalist styling with cutting edge technology. Sensors and microphone arrays packed within the two ear cups inform the two H1 chips for ANC and advanced operations like Spatial Audio.

Priced at $549, AirPods Max is in hot demand for the holidays. Those looking to snag a pair before Christmas might find stock at a nearby Apple Store, though availability is scarce.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 16
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,303member
    It's hard to say whether these are "overpriced," but I'm inclined to say "no" on that ... I've owned $400 headphones that didn't offer half the features this one does, they just offered really good, clear sound without adding "enhancements" to the bass or other such gimmicky crap. The spatial audio feature and some of the other niceties there might be worth the extra, let's say $150 over what I'd pay for headphones that just had great sound.

    I am furious, however, that instead of the $700 these should cost in Canada ($550 US converted to C$), they are $779 from Apple Canada. I get that there needs to be some "swing" in the price so they aren't constantly changing the price for foreign markets, but COME ON.

    Your HomePod mini is a perfectly reasonable C$129 in Canada. The straight conversion rate as I write this would make them $126 and change. That's entirely reasonable. The full HomePod in Canada is $399 where it would, with today's rate, be $388 and change with conversion. Again, reasonable.

    $80 on top of the straight conversion for AirPods Max? That's gouge-y. It may not rise to the level of criminal, prosecutable gouging, but it fosters ill will and hampers sales. And this isn't just happening in Canada -- the UK price for AirPods Max is £549 when it would be £406 and change with straight conversion. That just seems mean.
    seanjBeatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 16
    chasm said:
    $80 on top of the straight conversion for AirPods Max? That's gouge-y. It may not rise to the level of criminal, prosecutable gouging, but it fosters ill will and hampers sales. And this isn't just happening in Canada -- the UK price for AirPods Max is £549 when it would be £406 and change with straight conversion. That just seems mean.
    What you dont take into account, its never the direct conversion, for example the UK you mention you forget about VAT needs to be added, which is exactly what apple do as prices have to show an inclusive price with vat. so bear that in mind it makes price £508
    gregoriusmmuthuk_vanalingamwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 16
    chasm said:
    $80 on top of the straight conversion for AirPods Max? That's gouge-y. It may not rise to the level of criminal, prosecutable gouging, but it fosters ill will and hampers sales. And this isn't just happening in Canada -- the UK price for AirPods Max is £549 when it would be £406 and change with straight conversion. That just seems mean.
    What you dont take into account, its never the direct conversion, for example the UK you mention you forget about VAT needs to be added, which is exactly what apple do as prices have to show an inclusive price with vat. so bear that in mind it makes price £508
    Straight conversion from the Swedish AppleStore: 810 USD.

    Remove the local tax and that's 648 USD.

    AirPods Max at apple.com is rn: 549 USD.

    If buying them from the Hong Kong store (no v.a.t.) they are 593 USD.

    So, if you're in Sweden and need to buy enough Apple stuff (assuming it's not within like a corporation/valid business expense) you could get a "free" one week vacation in some other country simply by buying your stuff while there.  :D
  • Reply 4 of 16
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.
    The actual individual parts has a fairly limited impact on the sticker price; and sometimes removing hardware features would actually increase the price, as the costs would go up significantly by separating hardware that's currently made into a single unit. Also, when it comes to sound equipment like this one all parts are working together; so removing a single "unnecessary" feature might make the product absolute rubbish, unless, once again, the whole thing is basically redone from scratch.

    As a comparison you can look at the HomePod and the HomePod mini; which absolutely share a certain level of ancestry, but where the mini in no way simply is just a full HomePod with a few parts removed.

    And from a business perspective a "much cheaper" (depending on any hyperbole in that usage, ofc) product simply doesn't fit with their current line of products. Unless we start to see a much clearer main/pro-divide (incl. in pricing) among the Apple sound products there's just no fit for a cheaper AP Max; and it makes even less sense in light of Apple still needing to devote full production to fulfilling the AP Max orders.

    Even the current naming of their different AirPods would make it a bit awkward with a new cheaper OE option… like… we have the regular, the pro, the max, and… what?? AirPods light? (Which would make the "light" the second heaviest option.)

    Unless Apple is willing to royally piss off all the AirPods Max buyers, by revamping the whole line within the first half of 2021, I don't see a cheaper OE option anytime soon.

    (Personally I do think that considering the hints of where things are heading the internals of the AirPods Max might actually run at a risk of being a touch outdated for such a major launch of a, to the average buyer, expensive product; and I'm very curious to see what the lifecycle will be like for these, and how the hardware will fit in with their continuing work with AR. Like why the heck is there no UWB chip to help with exact positioning? Shouldn't they at least have slapped a U1 in there to future-proof them; or is there such a disconnect between the internal departments that AP Max users will find them obsolete, within the greater Apple ecosystem, after just a year? )
    Beatswatto_cobraStrangeDays
  • Reply 5 of 16
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.
    Yes, and I'm hoping for a much cheaper Lamborghini, something that runs decent, with the same wow factor design, but without the huge engine, high-tech transmission, special suspension... I don't need all that. Basically I want a Mustang that's a Lambo, and I suspect your wish and my wish will arrive at the same time. 
    svanstromBeatswatto_cobraStrangeDaysrandominternetperson
  • Reply 6 of 16
    MplsPMplsP Posts: 3,931member
    With the exception of the Mac Pro, I don’t think I’ve seen an apple product in the last 5-10 years that hasn’t completely optimized every square mm of space. Even knowing that, the amount of stuff packed in these is impressive. The other issue with speakers is any physical component you add inside can affect the sound, too. 

    It’s encouraging to see screw holes and what appears to be a reasonably accessible battery for these. Having $200 AirPods be disposable when the battery died was bad enough; fortunately the AirPods Max seem like they are designed to be serviced and stay usable. 

    As far as price goes, they are clearly expensive. Value is in the eye of the consumer. The reviews I’ve seen say their sound and noise canceling are excellent; they are clearly not cheap headphones with a jacked up price. The question everyone has is whether they are worth a $250+ premium over other headphones. From what I can tell that is a debatable point and will depend on the individual, but it’s not a slam dunk, and if you don’t have an iPhone then the feature set is diminished and they likely aren’t worth it. 

    And I say what everyone else is saying - $550 and they can’t even include the flip pin’ cable????
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 16
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.

    I have ordered a pair of these headphones and am looking forward to testing them out,, but am puzzled by lack of an on/off switch. I have yet to hear of a single justification for this.

    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 16
    jcs2305jcs2305 Posts: 1,337member
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.

    Apple already makes what you are looking for.. they are called Beats Solo Pro....  and they are on sale right now. B)


    Beatswatto_cobraStrangeDaysrandominternetperson
  • Reply 9 of 16
    jcs2305jcs2305 Posts: 1,337member
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.

    I have ordered a pair of these headphones and am looking forward to testing them out,, but am puzzled by lack of an on/off switch. I have yet to hear of a single justification for this.

    I saw a review that states that left on and out of the case overnight the battery percentage didn't move. After a while they go into a sort of sleep ( low power mode ) and if they are placed into the case they are go into a super low power mode.

    If you think about it Airpods and Airpods Pro are the same.. there is no on/off switch or any defined way to shut them completely off and battery life isn't an issue.

    watto_cobrarandominternetperson
  • Reply 10 of 16
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    Great value. Every time a non-pro complains about the price, I find a new article that justifies the price.

    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.

    I have ordered a pair of these headphones and am looking forward to testing them out,, but am puzzled by lack of an on/off switch. I have yet to hear of a single justification for this.



    Apple has told use several times that they want to make technology "disappear". These have great battery management and it would seem pointless to have a clunky switch with little to no function. (Incoming Samsung ad mocking no on/off switch before copying themselves?)
    watto_cobraStrangeDays
  • Reply 11 of 16
    MplsPMplsP Posts: 3,931member
    Beats said:
    Great value. Every time a non-pro complains about the price, I find a new article that justifies the price.

    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.

    I have ordered a pair of these headphones and am looking forward to testing them out,, but am puzzled by lack of an on/off switch. I have yet to hear of a single justification for this.



    Apple has told use several times that they want to make technology "disappear". These have great battery management and it would seem pointless to have a clunky switch with little to no function. (Incoming Samsung ad mocking no on/off switch before copying themselves?)
    A clunky switch like the crown or the other button they included?
    CloudTalkin
  • Reply 12 of 16
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,371member
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.
    I was thinking the same thing about the on/off switch, but then I started to look at Apple's other headphones and realized that many or most of them don't have an on/off switch. I think our knowledge that the Max is much more than a passive headphone and has a lot of embedded processing and batteries compels us to want to power it down in certain situations, like we do with our computers. I think Apple could have gone either way on this without creating even a mild furor, assuming the implementation was clean. I'm willing to take a wait & see position and observe the feedback from longer term users to draw a conclusion. If it proves to be an "oops" the next release will fix it.

    I've gotten over the price of these things for a few reasons. First of all I see them as being sufficiently different than anything on the market, to the point of being a new product category - "smart headphones" with lots of bells and whistles. Secondly, I think Apple put a lot of thought into the pricing and didn't just pull a number out of their ass. Setting the price high puts the Max on a pedestal and conveys a sense of exclusivity and luxury that makes it an aspirational acquisition. This meant that the build quality and feature set built into the product by Apple had to be impeccable. Other than the derision about the appearance of the case, the product itself seems to be living up to the high expectations that Apple has created.

    Finally, throughout Apple's history and with few exceptions they seem to be able to arrive at the price part of the 4P marketing mix on their products very well. In the past few years only the original HomePod comes to mind as a product that was probably priced too high out of the gate - and Apple permanently ratcheted the price down by 14% in response to something they must have learned from their sales data. Setting the right price on a product, especially one that is a discretionary purchase, is a very nontrivial exercise. It's not a case of simply applying a markup over cost to obtain a desired profit. The price has to factor into the whole marketing equation and the market that the product lives in. With a brand new and arguably market-defining product the price setting exercise is tougher still. But we can all rest assured that if Apple pooched this one, Apple, and all of us, will know about it pretty quickly. All signs so far are pointing to putting another one in the win column for Apple. 
    edited December 2020 watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 16
    dewme said:
    mike54 said:
    With all that fancy circuitry in there, I guess there is no room for just a simple on/off switch.

    I'm hoping for a much cheaper version, that sounds decent, with the same level of ANC, H1 chip, but without the spacial computational audio stuff, no gyro's  and I don't even need a sensor in each ear cup to pause sound.
    I was thinking the same thing about the on/off switch, but then I started to look at Apple's other headphones and realized that many or most of them don't have an on/off switch.
    Not just headphones…

    Unless we're talking a very rare reboot I don't even (manually) put anything into sleep mode; I simply just use my stuff, and put it down when I stop using it. At most I in a public environment lock the screen of my MBP (by moving the cursor to a hot corner) when leaving it.

    People for some reason just have this irrational fear that headphones with a 20h battery will stop working midday if they don't fiddle with a switch when putting it down; and it's just silly. It's like fearing not having ended a modern smartphone phone call simply because you didn't physically put down a receiver on a physical rotary phone.
    dewmewatto_cobraStrangeDaysrandominternetperson
  • Reply 14 of 16
    OK so they really look and sound cool, however, after owning the 2 x AirPods I have come to terms that daily use will last about 18mts before the batteries are shot. I have not heard how the Max will hold up. I cannot get my head around buying a luxury item that will only last a couple of years. Please help. 
  • Reply 15 of 16
    rmusikantow said:

    I have ordered a pair of these headphones and am looking forward to testing them out,, but am puzzled by lack of an on/off switch. I have yet to hear of a single justification for this.

    Why include something that's not necessary and makes user experience a tiny bit less "magical"?  AirPods and Apple TV don't have on/off switches, does HomePod?  I doubt it.
Sign In or Register to comment.