Robinhood CEO expected to testify on GameStop at House committee

Posted:
in General Discussion edited February 2021
The House Financial Services Committee will reportedly call on the CEO of Robinhood to testify over the online broker's decision to stop the controversial trading of GameStop stock.

Credit: Robinhood
Credit: Robinhood


Online brokerage firm Robinhood has already faced a petition asking Apple to remove it from the App Store, following its freezing of trades on GameStop. Now the House Financial Services Committee is reportedly planning to call CEO Vlad Tenev to testify on the topic at its February 18 hearing.

According to Politico, the hearing will in part focus on Robinhood's role in the recent tumultuous trading of both GameStop and other stocks. It will reportedly investigate whether Wall Street hedge fund managers and management companies influenced the decision.

The hearing, "Game Stopped? Who Wins and Loses When Short Sellers, Social Media, and Retail Investors Collide," will be chaired by House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters.

"I am concerned about whether or not Robinhood restricted the trading because there was collusion between Robinhood and some of the hedge funds that were involved with this," she said separately on MSNBC.

Politico reports that it is not yet clear whether any other firms or financial institutions will be called testify. However, Rep. Al Green, chair of the Financial Oversight Subcommittee, has said that he is focusing on the role of two other companies, Citadel and Citadel Securities.

Citadel reportedly bailed out one hedge fund that had seen severe losses over GameStop. At the same time, Citadel Securities uses Robinhood for its own stock trades.

"[I want to know] whether or not there was something about this relationship that caused Robinhood to act," said Rep. Al Green, "or did Robinhood act because of reasons associated with its liquidity."

Robinhood has yet to comment on the forthcoming hearing. However it did previously publish a blog post saying that its freezing trades was a "risk-management decision" based on market "volatility."

Other online brokerage platforms, including Public and E-Trade, also froze trading.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 3
    The only justification I can think of that Robinhood might have for halting trading of a stock, or selling an investor's existing stock (especially at a loss!), is if the investor is buying on margin, with Robinhood's money.  But I don't know if even that is legal.

    But selling an investor's stock when that investor used their own money simply cannot be legal.  If it is, the securities laws are fundamentally broken.
  • Reply 2 of 3
    maestro64maestro64 Posts: 5,043member
    This guy tanked his company, he took care of the customers paying his bills, the hedge fund but screws the people who provide the money. 

    Keep in mind robinhood does not make make money off the investors, the reason the investors went to robinhood was for the free trade. Robinhood makes money from hedge fund.

     The investors should have known the robinhood was not looking out for their best interests. Another example users are the product being sold to others.
  • Reply 3 of 3
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,095member
    maestro64 said:
    This guy tanked his company, he took care of the customers paying his bills, the hedge fund but screws the people who provide the money. 

    Keep in mind robinhood does not make make money off the investors, the reason the investors went to robinhood was for the free trade. Robinhood makes money from hedge fund.

     The investors should have known the robinhood was not looking out for their best interests. Another example users are the product being sold to others.
    People will always prioritize "free" before using their brains.  Then, when they realize that "free" is not free, they have hissy fits.
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.