Lawsuit claims Apple Watch infringes on activity monitoring patent
Apple has been slapped with a new lawsuit alleging that the Apple Watch infringes on a patent related to health devices that monitor physical activity.
Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider
The complaint, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, accuses Apple of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,059,576, titled "Training and Safety Device, System and Method to Aid in Proper Movement During Physical Activity."
According to the complaint, the patent covers a "portable, self-contained device for monitoring movement of body parts during physical activity." It comprises a movement sensor, a power source, and a microprocessor.
Other portions of the patent cover the analysis of data and storing information in memory. It also outlines key components of the device, including a real-time clock and a user input system.
The lawsuit contends that the Apple Watch infringes on the patent because it is a "self-contained device that uses an accelerometer to measure the angle and velocity of body movements, a user-programmable microprocessor capable of recognizing and analyzing data generated by the accelerometer, and internal memory and a clock for storing the data along with a timestamp."
More specifically, the lawsuit names the Apple Watch, Apple Watch Series, Apple Watch Series 2, and Apple Watch Series 3 as infringing products. It may also include other Apple Watch models, such as the new Apple Watch Series 6.
In 2017, the plaintiff reportedly contacted Apple to inform it of the infringement. According to the complaint, Apple's general counsel denied the claims. The lawsuit uses the interaction as evidence that Apple is willfully infringing on the intellectual property.
Additionally, the patent points out that the plaintiff requested that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reexamine the IP in 2015 to check the patentability of its claims. The USPTO reportedly reaffirmed the claims, and determined that an additional 156 dependent claims are also patentable.
The plaintiff in the case is non-practicing entity LoganTree, owned by Theodore and Anne Brann. Theodore is the named inventor of the '576 patent.
The lawsuit, which demands a jury trial, asks for damages, attorneys' fees, and other costs. Notably, it doesn't ask for an order barring Apple from continuing the alleged infringement.
Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider
The complaint, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, accuses Apple of infringing on U.S. Patent No. 6,059,576, titled "Training and Safety Device, System and Method to Aid in Proper Movement During Physical Activity."
According to the complaint, the patent covers a "portable, self-contained device for monitoring movement of body parts during physical activity." It comprises a movement sensor, a power source, and a microprocessor.
Other portions of the patent cover the analysis of data and storing information in memory. It also outlines key components of the device, including a real-time clock and a user input system.
The lawsuit contends that the Apple Watch infringes on the patent because it is a "self-contained device that uses an accelerometer to measure the angle and velocity of body movements, a user-programmable microprocessor capable of recognizing and analyzing data generated by the accelerometer, and internal memory and a clock for storing the data along with a timestamp."
More specifically, the lawsuit names the Apple Watch, Apple Watch Series, Apple Watch Series 2, and Apple Watch Series 3 as infringing products. It may also include other Apple Watch models, such as the new Apple Watch Series 6.
In 2017, the plaintiff reportedly contacted Apple to inform it of the infringement. According to the complaint, Apple's general counsel denied the claims. The lawsuit uses the interaction as evidence that Apple is willfully infringing on the intellectual property.
Additionally, the patent points out that the plaintiff requested that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reexamine the IP in 2015 to check the patentability of its claims. The USPTO reportedly reaffirmed the claims, and determined that an additional 156 dependent claims are also patentable.
The plaintiff in the case is non-practicing entity LoganTree, owned by Theodore and Anne Brann. Theodore is the named inventor of the '576 patent.
The lawsuit, which demands a jury trial, asks for damages, attorneys' fees, and other costs. Notably, it doesn't ask for an order barring Apple from continuing the alleged infringement.
LoganTree v Apple by Mikey Campbell on Scribd
Comments
So I can sit down and think up something, with no prototype, patent it, and then sit back and wait until a company like Apple actually engineers, produces, and sells a product, then sue them for patent infringement. Is that how our Patent system is supposed to work? Really?
Didn’t the USPTO used to require a working model to get a patent?
Too bad my grandfather didn’t know about this. He could have patented the idea of communicating electronically over a wire without actually building anything. Later he could have sued Ma Bell for billions. I could have been rich.
The basic concept is pretty interesting for 1997, but the description of the concept (sensor is separate from the microprocessor) and the purpose (monitoring movement to prevent injury) seem unrelated to the Apple Watch.
Apple either thought their devices would not infringe or calculated the cost assuming they would be sued.
Either way, Apple legal is not surprised, I would think.
Though I would argue their general description of their patented idea was preceded by the Dick Tracy comics.
🤪
With this crap you can sue every company that make a tread mill.