GOP lawmakers mull taxing Big Tech to subsidize broadband access
Key Republican lawmakers in the House and Senate are warming up to the idea of leveling taxes on big U.S. tech companies to fund broadband subsidy programs.
Credit: WikiMedia Commons
The idea to compel technology giants to pay into a pool of money to subsidized broadband access first originated with Republican FCC commissioner Brendan Carr, Axios reported Monday. Several key GOP lawmakers have expressed interest in the proposal.
Sen. Roger Wicker, a top GOP lawmaker on the Senate's Commerce Committee, said he believes Congress should explore the proposal. The office of Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the ranking Republican on the House Energy & Commerce Committee, said that all options should be on the table. Additionally, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the idea "thought-provoking."
"Any conversation about building out broadband for unserved Americans should include a Big Tech user fee that corresponds to their use of that infrastructure," a spokesperson for McCarthy said. "Funding for the Universal Service Fund -- which is increasingly at odds with the principle of user pays -- needs to be updated and reimagined."
The Universal Service Fund is a broadband subsidy program managed by the Federal Communications Commission. All Americans pay a fee on their cellular bills that goes into the pool. However, the fee has been going up as the revenue base declines, leading some to call for a reform of the program.
FCC commissioner Carr said that Congress should force companies that benefit from broadband networks to pay into the subsidy fund. "It's just simply asking them to pay a fair share and start contributing on an equitable basis for these networks that they benefit from so tremendously," he said.
Apple would be affected because of its App Store, Facebook and Google would pay in because of internet advertising, and Amazon would be included because of its cloud services and video streaming.
The idea has seen some pushback from the technology industry. The Internet Association, a trade organization that represents Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google, characterized the idea as a punishment on large technology companies.
"We hope the FCC will take a common sense approach and not punish innovative, high-quality streaming services that are fulfilling consumer demand," said K. Dane Snowden, the Internet Association's president.
Although telecom firms have long argued that internet companies should pay for the privilege of using their networks, Carr's proposal also suggests that major telecom firms would pay into the fund.
Acting FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called the idea "intriguing," but said that the FCC doesn't have the ability to force companies to pay into the Universal Service Fund.
"We should be open to new ideas," Rosenworcel said. "But it's clear that this would require action from Congress."
Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast -- and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.
Credit: WikiMedia Commons
The idea to compel technology giants to pay into a pool of money to subsidized broadband access first originated with Republican FCC commissioner Brendan Carr, Axios reported Monday. Several key GOP lawmakers have expressed interest in the proposal.
Sen. Roger Wicker, a top GOP lawmaker on the Senate's Commerce Committee, said he believes Congress should explore the proposal. The office of Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, the ranking Republican on the House Energy & Commerce Committee, said that all options should be on the table. Additionally, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called the idea "thought-provoking."
"Any conversation about building out broadband for unserved Americans should include a Big Tech user fee that corresponds to their use of that infrastructure," a spokesperson for McCarthy said. "Funding for the Universal Service Fund -- which is increasingly at odds with the principle of user pays -- needs to be updated and reimagined."
The Universal Service Fund is a broadband subsidy program managed by the Federal Communications Commission. All Americans pay a fee on their cellular bills that goes into the pool. However, the fee has been going up as the revenue base declines, leading some to call for a reform of the program.
FCC commissioner Carr said that Congress should force companies that benefit from broadband networks to pay into the subsidy fund. "It's just simply asking them to pay a fair share and start contributing on an equitable basis for these networks that they benefit from so tremendously," he said.
Apple would be affected because of its App Store, Facebook and Google would pay in because of internet advertising, and Amazon would be included because of its cloud services and video streaming.
The idea has seen some pushback from the technology industry. The Internet Association, a trade organization that represents Apple, Amazon, Facebook, and Google, characterized the idea as a punishment on large technology companies.
"We hope the FCC will take a common sense approach and not punish innovative, high-quality streaming services that are fulfilling consumer demand," said K. Dane Snowden, the Internet Association's president.
Although telecom firms have long argued that internet companies should pay for the privilege of using their networks, Carr's proposal also suggests that major telecom firms would pay into the fund.
Acting FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel called the idea "intriguing," but said that the FCC doesn't have the ability to force companies to pay into the Universal Service Fund.
"We should be open to new ideas," Rosenworcel said. "But it's clear that this would require action from Congress."
Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast -- and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.
Comments
Ironically and sadly, that math is one of the very few things that crosses party lines.
FYI- that ...... "pool of money to subsidize broadband access" ..... already exist in the 1998 "Universal Service Fund" (under Connect America Fund in 2010) and is now being funded in the tune of around $8B a year. Before any politician collect any more taxes from corporations, billionaires, millionaires or just regular tax payers paying the USF fee on their telecom services, these politicians need to fix the leak in the pool. Continuing to collect more tax money to fill the pool is like continuously running a garden hose into the pool to make up for the leaking water lost.
https://www.fcc.gov/general/universal-service
https://www.accountingtoday.com/opinion/federal-universal-service-the-government-fee-that-knows-no-limit
Just google ...... "universal service slush fund"........ , to see just how wasteful and mismanaged this fund has been in the over 20 years they been charging telecom consumers in order to fund it.
http://www.teletruth.org/USFReport.htm https://www.businessinsider.com/call-it-the-universal-slush-fund-2010-10
https://constantinecannon.com/2019/06/07/usf-e-rate-fraud-whistleblowers/
https://www.cagw.org/thewastewatcher/reforms-are-needed-financing-universal-service-fund
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2285205/universal-services-fund-fraud--present-and-future.html
More often than not, loopholes are "created" in the same way security vulnerabilities in software are created: by omission, by failing to see something that might happen. Something that is almost inevitable when you have free movement of people and capital across state and national borders and different tax jurisdictions. The tax avoidance (not bullshit, an actual thing) that you dismiss is deliberate action by disingenuous people to avoid contributing to the societies that enable them to profit, and to shift the burden of maintaining that society onto others. You pay more because they are assholes.
But sure, defend those who are ripping you off. I can lead you to water, but I'm not going to waterboard you.