Apple may still be planning an AirPower style wireless charger

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited July 2021
Despite officially cancelling the AirPower project, more evidence has emerged of how Apple is continuing to research solving problems with wireless charging.

Apple's original AirPower
Apple's original AirPower


AirPower is the wireless charging mat that Apple announced, then cancelled, then reportedly revived, then seemingly dropped again. Regardless of the state of this on/off project, many patents and patent applications have been periodically revealed -- but none as new as this latest one.

"Wireless power system with device movement detection," is a newly revealed patent which is listed as being filed in February, 2020. It says that it follows a 2019 patent application, but even that original filing was after Apple cancelled the project.

This particular patent, now granted to Apple, has the specific aim of covering how a wireless mat can cope with devices being moved around on it.

AirPower was meant to allow users to place their iPhone, Apple Watch, and AirPods charging case anywhere on the mat to be charged. Part of that meant also recognizing when a user moves a device on the mat, and continuing to charge it correctly.

Apple's patent refers to what it calls "load lines," or specific "inverter circuitry in the wireless power transmitting device." The mat is able to detect when a device is placed on it, and use the nearest charging coils to power it.

"Device movement can be detected when the comparison indicates that the current and voltage measurements deviate from the expected load line by more than a threshold amount," says the patent. "When movement is detected, appropriate action can be taken."

"For example, the control circuitry may use coil inductance measurement circuitry to gather updated coil inductance measurements," it continues. "By analyzing the coil inductance measurements, the control circuitry can determine which coils to switch into use in transmitting the wireless power to the wireless power receiving device."

Detail from the patent showing a process of wireless charging
Detail from the patent showing a process of wireless charging


The patent is around 8,000 words long and gets into specific detail about control circuitry, and charging coils. It does not mention the word AirPower once, though, nor does it spend much time on giving examples of when detecting repositioning of a device is useful.

That's typical of a patent, but in this case it's also because there is little else that such a system can do but notice when a device is moved. It's conceivable that the same processes could be applied, at least in part, to a device using the more recent MagSafe.

However, it's mostly a clue that if Apple doesn't intend to launch AirPower, it still has aims to do something similar in the future.

Keep up with everything Apple in the weekly AppleInsider Podcast -- and get a fast news update from AppleInsider Daily. Just say, "Hey, Siri," to your HomePod mini and ask for these podcasts, and our latest HomeKit Insider episode too.If you want an ad-free main AppleInsider Podcast experience, you can support the AppleInsider podcast by subscribing for $5 per month through Apple's Podcasts app, or via Patreon if you prefer any other podcast player.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    caladaniancaladanian Posts: 380member
    Interesting!  :smile: 
    byronl
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 8
    Beatsbeats Posts: 3,073member
    It never made sense to scrap the project to me.  It’s a possible multi-billion dollar product. I hope it comes soon though.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 8
    williamhwilliamh Posts: 1,048member
    I guess some people still care. 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 8
    byronlbyronl Posts: 384member
    what if u have a solo loop band??
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 8
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,477member
    byronl said:
    what if u have a solo loop band??
    Scissors
    doozydozen
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 8
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    byronl said:
    what if u have a solo loop band??
    Take the strap off, or use something else.  Not difficult.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 8
    Yes Apple, please, by all means, keep researching ways for your users to waste more energy, while touting your own move towards more "green" status.

    Yes, yes, I absolutely get the appeal of more convenient charging solutions, and just putting one's device down on the table like this is mighty convenient.  So called "wireless" solutions like this one (which aren't actually "wireless", they just avoid attaching the wire directly to the device) are less efficient, wasting more power, than a direct wire connection.

    Broadcast power, for which Apple has allegedly also filed patents, is even worse.  The Inverse Square law applies, which states that the amount of power that impinges on a given area drops off in reverse proportion to the square of the distance from the source.  So if a phone that is 4 feet away from the broadcast point, then the power available at that point is one sixteenth of what it would be for a phone that is 1 foot away from the power source.
    forgot username
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 8
    Yes Apple, please, by all means, keep researching ways for your users to waste more energy, while touting your own move towards more "green" status.

    Yes, yes, I absolutely get the appeal of more convenient charging solutions, and just putting one's device down on the table like this is mighty convenient.  So called "wireless" solutions like this one (which aren't actually "wireless", they just avoid attaching the wire directly to the device) are less efficient, wasting more power, than a direct wire connection.

    Broadcast power, for which Apple has allegedly also filed patents, is even worse.  The Inverse Square law applies, which states that the amount of power that impinges on a given area drops off in reverse proportion to the square of the distance from the source.  So if a phone that is 4 feet away from the broadcast point, then the power available at that point is one sixteenth of what it would be for a phone that is 1 foot away from the power source.
    What is the energy expenditure for posting an comment ranting about the energy efficiency of a rumored product? 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.