Privacy and security are Apple's top App Store priorities, Tim Cook says

Posted:
in General Discussion
Amid regulatory scrutiny of the App Store, Apple CEO Tim Cook says that the company's primary focus is to maintain the privacy and security of the app marketplace.

Credit: James Yarema/Unsplash
Credit: James Yarema/Unsplash


During a Thursday earnings call with investors, Cook was asked about how Apple could balance regulators pushing for more choice on iOS and consumers wanting to have a streamlined ecosystem. Cook said the company's main focus was privacy and security.

"The main thing we're focused on in the App Store is keeping our focus on privacy and security. These are the two major tenets that have produced a very trusted environment where consumers and developers come together," said Cook. "Consumers can trust the developers and the apps are who they say they are. Developers get a huge audience to sell their software to."

Everything else beyond privacy and security is a "distant second," Cook added.

"What we're doing is working to explain the decisions that we've made that are key to keeping our privacy and security," Cook said. "Not having side-loading and alternate ways on the iPhone where we're opening up the iPhone to unreviewed apps that get by the privacy restrictions we put on the App Store."

There are a number of governments pushing for antitrust legislation that could upend Apple's App Store model, including in the U.S. and Europe. Cook added that Apple is "very focused in discussing privacy and security of the App Store with regulators and legislators."

Earlier in 2021, Apple largely won the major Epic Games v. Apple legal battle, with the court only mandating that Apple could no longer prevent developers from communicating with customers about alternate payment options. Apple has since appealed that decision, however.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 15
    I used to be really comfortable with these privacy & security rationales but after the whole CSAM scanning thing leaked I’m not really convinced. On macOS we’ve been able to install apps outside of the App Store without really killing platform security. It also seems like we’re still leaving iCloud end to end encryption out deliberately at this point. So for the first time ever I’m perfectly fine with side loading apps and just not seeing this ‘privacy & security first’ claim in their actions. 
    Oferelijahgmuthuk_vanalingambeowulfschmidtcuriousrun8
  • Reply 2 of 15
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    elijahgmuthuk_vanalingamcuriousrun8
  • Reply 3 of 15
    ...is this a very carefully worded and defined representation...?
    While it would seem all well and good that third party access is being restricted, are iCloud and Apple server data collection potentially increasing...?

    edited October 2021
  • Reply 4 of 15
    auxioauxio Posts: 2,751member
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    Like every other cloud storage provider does?  I'm sure they're all just doing it because they want to invade our privacy and not because it's a law enforcement mandate. /s
    aderutterwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 15
    I am an Apple customer and I want security and privacy and I don’t want to have to worry about viruses and malware and I don’t want to have to get apps to protect my devices and finances. I don’t care for developers getting access to my personal information. I want developers and their payments shops kept completely away from me. I don’t care about the supposed rights at all.
    slow n easywatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 15
    corp1corp1 Posts: 93member
    Maybe "approved" third-party app stores would somehow be required to abide by Apple's privacy and security policies (such as privacy labels)?

    I'm not sure how that would be verified and enforced though.

    There is a history of companies abusing enterprise developer certificates to sideload apps which violate Apple's privacy requirements:

    https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/01/30/apple-has-revoked-facebooks-enterprise-developer-certificates-after-sideload-violations
    https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/01/31/apple-kills-googles-enterprise-development-certificate-because-of-screenwise-meter

    edited October 2021
  • Reply 7 of 15
    corp1corp1 Posts: 93member
    Hedware said:
     I want developers and their payments shops kept completely away from me.
    Developers complain about not being able to get my email and phone number so they can "engage" with me.

    Shady apps like Facebook demand a phone number for "security" but then use it as a unique identifier for tracking and advertising purposes. 

    No thanks.
    edited October 2021 aderutterwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 15
    auxio said:
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    Like every other cloud storage provider does?  I'm sure they're all just doing it because they want to invade our privacy and not because it's a law enforcement mandate. /s
    Were you joking? There is no mandate. If there were a mandate then Apple would have been also required to do it a long time ago like all the other companies have already. That said I think people are exaggerating how bad it would be if Apple implemented their version. I trust Apple.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 15
    silvergold84silvergold84 Posts: 107unconfirmed, member
    Apple Store, operating system, hardware are only on Apple’s devices. No one other brand can feel diked by them. Developers of apps don’t have any innate right to be on iPhone and no one force them to create apps for iPhone. Almost of them are happy with Apple’s rules. Apple have right to decide about their products. Thanks to Apple people now have real choice to buy products with different characteristics on the market. Apple’s products are the most loved devices on the market. 
    aderutterwatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 15
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,507member
    Hedware said:
    I am an Apple customer and I want security and privacy and I don’t want to have to worry about viruses and malware and I don’t want to have to get apps to protect my devices and finances. I don’t care for developers getting access to my personal information. I want developers and their payments shops kept completely away from me. I don’t care about the supposed rights at all.
    If you've suffered malware on a mobile device, any OS, then the odds are extremely high you live in China. Outside of that country, and heavily-controlling countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, and poor India, mobile malware even for Android is for practical intents a non-issue.
    edited October 2021
  • Reply 11 of 15
    auxio said:
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    Like every other cloud storage provider does?  I'm sure they're all just doing it because they want to invade our privacy and not because it's a law enforcement mandate. /s
    My understanding of other cloud storage providers' practice is that they perform such scanning after it's left my device, not before, and that such scanning is done on their hardware, not mine.  So in that respect, it's not like "every other cloud storage provider does", is it?

    As I've said before, Apple's control of what is scanned on my device only pertains until some government decrees otherwise, at which point Apple will "comply with local government's laws and regulations", just as they've done before.
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 12 of 15
    F_Kent_DF_Kent_D Posts: 98unconfirmed, member
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    Nobody is scanning photos. Photos are flagged on-device by machine learning algorithms looking for certain metadata that matches usual descriptions of pornographic material that I don’t want my 6 and 11 year old girls or my 10 year old son to see, and yes, they all have their own iPhone. I don’t own child pornography so there’s nothing to hide in my photos anyways. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 15
    auxio said:
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    Like every other cloud storage provider does?  I'm sure they're all just doing it because they want to invade our privacy and not because it's a law enforcement mandate. /s
    "It's OK because they do it" is not a legitimate argument. Apple has been boasting about being the privacy company for many years. It is like saying "It's OK to torture people because they do it in China."
    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 14 of 15
    I used to be really comfortable with these privacy & security rationales but after the whole CSAM scanning thing leaked I’m not really convinced. On macOS we’ve been able to install apps outside of the App Store without really killing platform security. It also seems like we’re still leaving iCloud end to end encryption out deliberately at this point. So for the first time ever I’m perfectly fine with side loading apps and just not seeing this ‘privacy & security first’ claim in their actions. 
    CSAM scanning did not "leak".  It was announced by Apple.

    And from the rest of your post, you don't understand it, iCloud or end to end encryption, and what Apple is doing.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 15
    Was it privacy or security that convinced Cook to implement a program to scan everyone's photos on iCloud without their permission and without a search warrant?
    It is following the law of the country they operate in.  You probably know that, but just want to make stupid comments.
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.