Best argument I have seen for allowing all employees to work remotely: I make about 1/1000th of what Tim Cook makes but have a nicer home. Sure Tim's costs a lot more than mine does but money aside, there is no way I would trade mine for his. For one thing I have quite a bit of land around my home. Tim probably lives there to make the commute shorter. My commute is to walk out my bedroom and one door down into my study. Eat your heart out, Tim!
Best argument I have seen for allowing all employees to work remotely: I make about 1/1000th of what Tim Cook makes but have a nicer home. Sure Tim's costs a lot more than mine does but money aside, there is no way I would trade mine for his. For one thing I have quite a bit of land around my home. Tim probably lives there to make the commute shorter. My commute is to walk out my bedroom and one door down into my study. Eat your heart out, Tim!
1) You don't think Cook also works from home nor has the ability to work more from home if he, the CEO, so desires.
2) Cook's house costs more than your but you claim to have a "nicer home"? Can you back that up with comparisons to his home's fit and finish, modern conveniences, etc.? And, no, more land doesn't a "nicer" home make (see countless images of lone, dilapidated trailers on vasts amount of desert).
3) You can prefer your home to his all you want, but that's not the same as claiming yours is "nicer". By that measure, my home is "nicer" than both of yours which isn't exactly an objective statement.
Comments
2) Cook's house costs more than your but you claim to have a "nicer home"? Can you back that up with comparisons to his home's fit and finish, modern conveniences, etc.? And, no, more land doesn't a "nicer" home make (see countless images of lone, dilapidated trailers on vasts amount of desert).
3) You can prefer your home to his all you want, but that's not the same as claiming yours is "nicer". By that measure, my home is "nicer" than both of yours which isn't exactly an objective statement.