If only Apple thought this way
read this
discuss
[edit] do you think Apple will kill this and attempt to do something similar? If this bloke can do it then why not Apple.
so simple - PS, mobo, basic I/O .. everything else optional.
a pizza box with opportunities galore.
I would love one
[/edit]
discuss
[edit] do you think Apple will kill this and attempt to do something similar? If this bloke can do it then why not Apple.
so simple - PS, mobo, basic I/O .. everything else optional.
a pizza box with opportunities galore.
I would love one
[/edit]
Comments
Originally posted by g::masta
read this
discuss
1) Why couldn't you give at least a small description of what was on the link?
2) Why exactly is this in FH?
Originally posted by MCQ
1) Why couldn't you give at least a small description of what was on the link?
2) Why exactly is this in FH?
1) humble apologies ..
2) cos it has yet to be manufactured - hence future.
Apple doesn't do this because:
- Apple doesn't support DIY PC building
- It would demolish to high margin PowerMac's sales
- Old components are harder to sell outside of the hobbyist/DIY markets
Of course, who doesn't want a cheap, fast, totally custom BTO Mac?touch and go.
if the 970 comes to market, then i think this would definitely be an option for G4 / G3 chip machines ...
Its a noble business plan but it probably won't be able to undercut the price of used apple hardware.
No, Macs aren't overpriced: the G4s are. Try and build a computer using motherboard from TerraSoft Solutions, and - because you'll get a G4/800 at most - build it with the same components the eMac - which is available as a G4/800 - has. Guess what, it's more expensive than the eMac, without the monitor. Nor can it run Mac OS X, because it isn't an Apple motherboard.
Now, this "iBox" is based off an Apple motherboard, but that doesn't rid us of pricing issue.
(Yes, I would love to be able to buy 20 iBoxes for my school, or one iBox as a great, tiny, cheap Mac OS X Server.)
Originally posted by g::masta
Apple can definitely afford to do this simply cos it will cut manufacturing costs and since the customer will need to purchase at least some of the innards from Apple (chip) then Apple would make sales where they possibly would have lost out before.
touch and go.
if the 970 comes to market, then i think this would definitely be an option for G4 / G3 chip machines ...
Not really. There are plenty of CPU upgrade makers out there. For example Giga Designs is a new one and they have very reasonable prices.
One way to keep something like kits under control would be to bundle a full retail version of Mac OS X with every motherboard. There would have to be other controls too, to keep it from impacting "normal" Mac sales.
But the iBox will never be more than a fringe thing unless 1) this guy decides to do it as more than "a hobby" (his words) and 2) Apple cooperates.
Originally posted by Chinney
Sounds interesting, because Apple really does not have an entry-level upgradeable anymore. In fact, they don't really have an entry-level priced machine at all.
I mostly agree.
It is also important to note that older powermacs can still be bought. Replace the drives and they're as good as new. A G4 from three years ago makes an excellent entry level machine, sporting the same peripheral compatibility as the newest machines. Computer depreciation is a fascinating concept...
(where's the nerd smilie?)
Originally posted by Chucker
Um. Nice idea. It'll fail.
He explains he's doing this as a hobby, not to get rich building cheap computers. As long as he can more or less break even -- which I imagine he can, if Apple stays off his ass -- I think he should do fine.
"When we started the little partnership, it was just like, Oh, this will be fun," Wozniak says. "We won't make any money, but it'll be fun."
heh heh
Count me in for two when the motherboard gets upgraded to the new 970 motherboards which are hopefully to come.
And comming with S-ATA, DDR-3200, 8x AGP, 450 Mhz DDR bus.
MmMm.. Gamer mac.. Fully upgradeable... MMmmmm... Cube's replacement.. MmMmm...