Remember when that old anti-Trump, pro-Putin invading Ukraine guy on here said that you should never listen to the Apple Watch saying anything about ECG readings because it was just a fashion accessory and only a single-lead ECG that could never amount to a real-world use that could lead to saving lives? I do.
Your comment is very contradictory. Trump is very pro Putin and very frequently praises him and says nice things about Russia. Also, why bring politics into a non politics story. Also, how do you know that the guy is even old when the ECG feature didn’t even come out that long ago?
My post is factual. You’ll have to ask the poster to whom I’m referring why he’s so contradictory.
I’m not saying that your post is not factual. Just contradictory. You said that a poster was anti-Trump and at the same time pro-Putin. I was just pointing out that Trump is also pro-Putin.
Trump is also pro golf. And I'm going to assume that there are some golfers who don't much like Trump. There's no contradiction in not 100% aligning yourself with a political leader. Only dogmatic sheep do that.
So what was the point of mentioning Trump at all, then? If the article was about the WATCH inspiring a man to call his doctor and potentially saving his life, then what is the point of bringing politics into the conversation?
Remember when that old anti-Trump, pro-Putin invading Ukraine guy on here said that you should never listen to the Apple Watch saying anything about ECG readings because it was just a fashion accessory and only a single-lead ECG that could never amount to a real-world use that could lead to saving lives? I do.
Your comment is very contradictory. Trump is very pro Putin and very frequently praises him and says nice things about Russia. Also, why bring politics into a non politics story. Also, how do you know that the guy is even old when the ECG feature didn’t even come out that long ago?
My post is factual. You’ll have to ask the poster to whom I’m referring why he’s so contradictory.
I’m not saying that your post is not factual. Just contradictory. You said that a poster was anti-Trump and at the same time pro-Putin. I was just pointing out that Trump is also pro-Putin.
Trump is also pro golf. And I'm going to assume that there are some golfers who don't much like Trump. There's no contradiction in not 100% aligning yourself with a political leader. Only dogmatic sheep do that.
So what was the point of mentioning Trump at all, then? If the article was about the WATCH inspiring a man to call his doctor and potentially saving his life, then what is the point of bringing politics into the conversation?
Do you think that mentioning that Lincoln is on the penny is "bringing politics into a conversation"? I sure fucking hope not. I merely mentioned someone that rallied hard against the ECG rumors of the Watch long before it was released and then against he Watch as a way of helping save lives because, according to him, it wasn't a 12-lead ECG administrators by professionals.
PS: If you don't want to get into a discussion about politics -or- talk about something other than the title of the article then don't ask asinine questions about how someone can be for one person and against a completely different person.
Remember when that old anti-Trump, pro-Putin invading Ukraine guy on here said that you should never listen to the Apple Watch saying anything about ECG readings because it was just a fashion accessory and only a single-lead ECG that could never amount to a real-world use that could lead to saving lives? I do.
Your comment is very contradictory. Trump is very pro Putin and very frequently praises him and says nice things about Russia. Also, why bring politics into a non politics story. Also, how do you know that the guy is even old when the ECG feature didn’t even come out that long ago?
My post is factual. You’ll have to ask the poster to whom I’m referring why he’s so contradictory.
I’m not saying that your post is not factual. Just contradictory. You said that a poster was anti-Trump and at the same time pro-Putin. I was just pointing out that Trump is also pro-Putin.
Trump is also pro golf. And I'm going to assume that there are some golfers who don't much like Trump. There's no contradiction in not 100% aligning yourself with a political leader. Only dogmatic sheep do that.
So what was the point of mentioning Trump at all, then? If the article was about the WATCH inspiring a man to call his doctor and potentially saving his life, then what is the point of bringing politics into the conversation?
No one brought Trump into the conversation. Xed was bringing GeorgeBMac into the conversation, and remembering something dumb that he said about this topic.
I'm a big fan of the ECG feature. Wrote a post almost two years ago sharing a segment of a friend's ECG showing the quality of the data it collects, then discussed features of an ECG in a later post in the thread. It's really cool stuff and helped that friend catch a really sporadic fibrillation. It's great that it's becoming more widely available.
Comments
PS: If you don't want to get into a discussion about politics -or- talk about something other than the title of the article then don't ask asinine questions about how someone can be for one person and against a completely different person.