Apple nears Oscar win with 'CODA,' but it cost millions and 'incredibly heated' negotiatio...

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV
Apple TV+ hit "CODA" has a strong shot at winning the Best Picture Oscar, beating Amazon and Netflix to the honor -- but acquiring the film exposed the streamer to the fraught and costly world of international film-making.




Despite all of the industry hype and its string of previous awards, "CODA" must remain an outside chance for the Academy Award for Best Picture, simply because it comes from Apple. So far, no streaming service has taken the top Oscar, and if Apple manages it, it will have succeeded in under three years since launch.

However, "CODA" was not produced by Apple, it was acquired by the streamer after completion. The short story is that Apple TV+ bought it for a record $25 million after it was screened at the Sundance Film Festival.

The full story is much, much more complex. According to Puck, before Apple wrote its check, "CODA" had already been sold to multiple distributors in multiple territories around the world.

This is common for films which tend to be financed through many companies, and as part of those deals will often have "pre-sold" the distribution rights. Apple TV+ wanted "CODA" for its own, and Apple TV+ is global, so the company had to find a way to renegotiate all of those pre-sale deals.

Plus "CODA" is an English-language remake of the 2014 French film, "La Famille Belier." So there were underlying rights for that film - and since the original was a success, reportedly distributors paid more for the remake than usual.

And then there was the trade press. Puck says that the various publications covering the international film industry, revealed Apple's buying of the film before any of these other countries and other companies were informed.

Apple has routinely been secretive about its interest in buying companies, or even property, because its name and its known finances, mean the price goes up. That unquestionably happened with "CODA" and these distributors in other countries, but it's again more complicated.






Undoubtedly, Apple had to offer these firms a larger kill fee, as it's called, because of who Apple is. But right from when it was completed, "CODA" was seen as an Oscar contender and taking a kill fee means walking away from having a Best Picture movie in your library.

"The short term kill fee is never going to make up for the outsize loss of a best picture winner," independent film distributor Tom Quinn told Puck. Other unnamed sources told the publication that an Oscar win "exponentially" increases a film's value forever.

The complexity was reportedly enough that Apple considered abandoning "CODA."

"It got incredibly heated," a source involved in some negotiations said. "An uncomfortable experience for everyone," said a second source.

Ultimately, Apple failed to get worldwide rights to the film, with Mexico, Italy, and Japan among those refusing to deal.

Nonetheless, for the US and the majority of the world, "CODA" is an Apple TV+ movie. A Best Picture win for it at the Oscars on March 27, 2022, would be historic for streamers, all of which - including Apple - have hoped for such a victory from the start.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    “Hey here’s a chance for your fledgling streamer to win an Oscar and beat Netflix and Amazon to the honor, but it’ll cost you mill-“ 

    “Say less.” - Apple. 

    Lol you really think millions of dollars was or is going to prevent them from this kind of content? They don’t have a ceiling when it comes to money. They ARE the ceiling. 
    tmaykiltedgreenbyronl
  • Reply 2 of 10
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    If buying other people's properties can entitle you claim to their rewards, then Apple could simply buy companies that already have Oscars. For example, Warner Bros' market cap is $19 Billion, so Apple could buy them (using just 10 weeks of Apple's profits) and claim to have then earned the first Oscar for Best Picture (1929's "Wings.")

    And since Warner Bros has (I think) 9 Best Picture Oscars in their trophy case, Apple would be paying only $2 Billion per Oscar.
    kiltedgreenbyronl
  • Reply 3 of 10
    What a curious article. There may be a lot of paperwork involved in the endless negotiations required with 20 different companies … but as for paying millions being an obstacle? Isn’t that a few hours of profit for Apple or something? Hardly a deal breaker.
    byronl
  • Reply 4 of 10
    AppleishAppleish Posts: 691member
    Hope it wins. Tim Cook is going to the Oscars, so that's a pretty good indication of its chances.
    byronl
  • Reply 5 of 10
    JapheyJaphey Posts: 1,767member
    Appleish said:
    Hope it wins. Tim Cook is going to the Oscars, so that's a pretty good indication of its chances.
    More losers go to the Oscars than winners, so not really. 
    byronlFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 6 of 10
    danoxdanox Posts: 2,869member
    I’m interested in Apple for a better OS, SOC, design, engineering, hardware, this distraction in movies and TV doesn’t make Apple level money and it never will, movie studio’s resell every 10 years to a new country bumpkin in town or a new sugar daddy shows up spending big money and Apple is that new bumpkin, hopefully they can pull their heads out of their ass to use that new energy efficient SOC to start making servers to make more real money.
  • Reply 7 of 10
    Everyone's missing the point; a studio or a director doesn't have to sell the rights to their films.  No one is holding a gun to their head and forcing them to accept an offer.

    The ability to say "no" is more powerful than all the money in the world.
    byronlFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 8 of 10
    hucom2000hucom2000 Posts: 149member
    „The ability to say "no" is more powerful than all the money in the world.“
    Amen
    FileMakerFeller
  • Reply 9 of 10
    designr said:
    Some people seem to think that Apple—because it has $60B or so sitting in the bank—is unlimited in what it can or will spend.

    Maybe. Probably not.

    Any company—Apple included, and probably especially—sets up limits, guidelines, and parameters for its expenses and investments. Even if they are aggressively entering a market, it's doubtful that Tim Cook just set up the TV+ team with a grand vision and just said "Here's the checkbook. Have at it."

    Now while the $25M is only a couple million over the previously recorded deal of this sort, you have to remember that there's an overall budget and investment plan here. And Apple is likely trying to be strategic and "careful" with their money. It's unlikely just a spend-fest in which there is no "ceiling." That's not at all how companies—even Apple—work. Well, not those that want to stay in business.

    Every other day we wake up to a new deal Apple has made be it with an A-list actor, a studio film, a television series with A-list talent across the board…millions of dollars worth of deals. And oh wait, don’t be surprised to see the billion dollar business that is the NFL come to Apple as well. If there is a ceiling, you can’t see it. Apple has ZERO problem opening the wallet for any of this stuff. They want to win. And they’ll spend whatever they need to to be that winner. Tim Cook is absolutely saying “have at it”. If you think he isn’t, you apparently aren’t watching the product they’re putting out there at an almost weekly basis. 
Sign In or Register to comment.