Tim Cook says return to office work plan is 'the mother of all experiments'
CEO Tim Cook accepts Apple's plans for bringing staff back in to offices needs tweaks, says the company is trialling ways to balance remote working.
Following his remarks about privacy erosion at the Time100 summit, Tim Cook also told the conference that Apple has not decided on its return to work plans.
"We're running the mother of all experiments because we don't know," said Cook. "We're running a pilot and trying to find a place that makes the best of both of these worlds."
Apple's announced plans, although regularly postponed as the coronavirus situation, have proved controversial with staff.
"We could be the first to say the starting point is likely wrong and will take tweaks," continued Cook.
Apple's CEO stressed that his own preference is for in-person working, specifically because of the "serendipity" of workplace meetings. However, he also said that online remote interactions are "not inferior, just different."
Without detailing any plans regarding Apple AR, Cook also said that this technology "stands a chance of enhancing our conversation, of enhancing our connection, instead of replacing it."
Read on AppleInsider
Following his remarks about privacy erosion at the Time100 summit, Tim Cook also told the conference that Apple has not decided on its return to work plans.
"We're running the mother of all experiments because we don't know," said Cook. "We're running a pilot and trying to find a place that makes the best of both of these worlds."
Apple's announced plans, although regularly postponed as the coronavirus situation, have proved controversial with staff.
"We could be the first to say the starting point is likely wrong and will take tweaks," continued Cook.
Apple's CEO stressed that his own preference is for in-person working, specifically because of the "serendipity" of workplace meetings. However, he also said that online remote interactions are "not inferior, just different."
Without detailing any plans regarding Apple AR, Cook also said that this technology "stands a chance of enhancing our conversation, of enhancing our connection, instead of replacing it."
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
I totally agree with this being a huge experiment, but I think it is even more impactful and far reaching than what any single company like Apple is anticipating. Moving yet another level of human interaction behind computer screens is only going to further isolate and insulate people from those around them, their immediate community, and open them up to developing online and virtual connections that are even further disconnected from their physical reality and circumstances. I tend to believe that team building is a continuous, slow burn process that evolves when everyone feels as though they’re “all in this together” and if the ship goes down, everyone goes down with it, as opposed to the forced kumbaya “team building” exercises. I guess we will see, not just at Apple but across the whole post-pandemic working landscape.
1. The job often cannot be done the same way, depending on the industry and position. In-person meetings and collaboration are important in many fields.
2. Mandate it? Good lord. Is there no end to what nanny state leftists want to mandate? This is a horrendously awful idea.
And it went well for some, and not so much for others.
It is truly remarkable how many times you have insisted something was the case only to contradict yourself later.
Here's the deal for me ... I've been offered what looked like great jobs jobs in "commuter hell" and "real estate pricing nightmare" locations and quickly turned them down exactly for the reasons I mentioned. Had I accepted any of those positions I would have done so with the full knowledge of what I'd be in for had I accepted those offers. Now if employers want to remove or reduce some of those impediments using subsidies, allowances, or work-from-home deals - or whatever other kinds of deals they want to put together, that's their prerogative and maybe it will bring in talent that they would otherwise not be able to attract.
I'm not discounting the fact that the pandemic exposed some things about how we've been doing things that may not make as much sense anymore, or at least not make sense universally. But I'd still prefer that companies learn by these experiences and come up with ways to adjust if necessary, or like Apple, treat the next phase of the back-to-the-office transition as somewhat of an experiment and learning exercise. Once they get some run time on the experiment and find out what works and what doesn't, and see how it actually affects the bottom line, maybe then make some informed decisions about how to move forward. Perhaps Apple will find that monetary subsidies and allowances that de-suckify some of the issues getting people to come to work for Apple at Apple's physical locations will be part of the mix. Who knows? But mandates - never.
Working from home is not a solution to inflation. It was a TEMPORARY measure to buy time until we. understood what we were dealing with and much of that was government overreach to begin with. Now we know and have measures in place to deal with it. Time to get back to work. Period.
I personally don't opt to work from home. I feel far less productive, and I really enjoy the social aspect of working back in the office versus sitting at home all day every day and not seeing my peers. The 100% working from home thing isn't good for society as a whole going forward nor is it good for people's mental health. Just my opinion.