Qualcomm antitrust fine over iPhone modem payments shot down by appeals court

Posted:
in iPhone
An appeals court has ruled that A 1 billion euro fine applied to chipmaker Qualcomm over what was was alleged to be illegal payments to Apple to maintain modem placement in the iPhone will not stand.




"A number of procedural irregularities affected Qualcomm's rights of defense and invalidate the Commission's analysis of the conduct alleged against Qualcomm," the judges sitting on the appeals court said in their ruling.

The ruling appears to be based on a lack of concrete evidence showing that Apple or the market as a whole was damaged by Qualcomm's behavior.

"The Commission did not provide an analysis which makes it possible to support the findings that the payments concerned had actually reduced Apple's incentives to switch to Qualcomm's competitors in order to obtain supplies of LTE chipsets for certain iPad models to be launched in 2014 and 2015," the judges added.

The fine was applied to Qualcomm in 2018 by European Commissioner for Competition Margrethe Vestager. Qualcomm very nearly immediately appealed to the courts, and Wednesday's ruling shuts the door on the fine.

"Qualcomm paid billions of US Dollars to a key customer, Apple, so that it would not buy from rivals," Vestager said in a statement at the time. "These payments were not just reductions in price -- they were made on the condition that Apple would exclusively use Qualcomm's baseband chipsets in all its iPhones and iPads."

The ruling by the EU determined that Qualcomm's market dominance in LTE baseband chipsets came about in part because of payments to Apple that violated EU antitrust rules. The EU found that Qualcomm's rival chipmakers were "denied the possibility to compete effectively for Apple's significant business, no matter how good their products were" because of this payment.

Internal documents seen by the EU found that Apple "gave serious consideration" to switching part of its baseband chipset supply. But the paid exclusive arrangement from Qualcomm proved to be a factor in Apple not changing, according to the European Commission.

The report by Reuters on Wednesday morning notes that the European Commission can appeal the matter. It isn't clear if it will.

The appeals courts will hear an appeal by Google next, challenging the European Commission's blockbuster fine it applied over its use of Android to squeeze rivals.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 4
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,053member
    I don't get the connection. Both Qualcomm and Apple are US companies headquartered in the US. If there was anything illegal or anti-competitive going on with Qualcomm modem chip sale deal with Apple, shouldn't the US FTC be the one to investigate and collect any fine (if found guilty)? How did the EU Commission get jurisdiction to determine that such a transaction between two US companies was anti-completive and then collect a $1B euro fine?  Who died and made Margarethe Vestager the Queen of the whole Tech World?

    The only connection I can think of is that Intel (also a US company), Qualcomm main and probably only competitor for Apple modem business at the time, have a fab plant in Ireland. Or maybe it's related to Intel future plans to invest 10's of billions of dollars in the EU.

    This was announced, before the fine was tossed out today. 

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/eu-news-2022-release.html#gs.3r122a ;
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 4
    danoxdanox Posts: 2,869member
    Apple 1 QUALCOMM 1 Margie 0
    edited June 2022 watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 4
    chadbagchadbag Posts: 2,000member

    I don't get the connection
    I think it is merely the fact the products are sold there, in the EU.  Nothing more.  
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 4
    thttht Posts: 5,450member
    davidw said:
    I don't get the connection. Both Qualcomm and Apple are US companies headquartered in the US. If there was anything illegal or anti-competitive going on with Qualcomm modem chip sale deal with Apple, shouldn't the US FTC be the one to investigate and collect any fine (if found guilty)? How did the EU Commission get jurisdiction to determine that such a transaction between two US companies was anti-completive and then collect a $1B euro fine?  Who died and made Margarethe Vestager the Queen of the whole Tech World?

    The only connection I can think of is that Intel (also a US company), Qualcomm main and probably only competitor for Apple modem business at the time, have a fab plant in Ireland. Or maybe it's related to Intel future plans to invest 10's of billions of dollars in the EU.

    This was announced, before the fine was tossed out today. 

    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/news/eu-news-2022-release.html#gs.3r122a ;
    iPhones initially shipped with Infineon cellular modems, from 2007 to about 2011, to whenever Apple stated making Verizon compatible phones and switched over to Qualcomm modems. Infineon is a European company. Intel bought the cell phone business from Infineon in 2010 or 2011 as they tried to enter the smartphone market. Apple desperately wanted a Qualcomm modem competitor so they could drive down modem costs, and worked with Intel/Infineon for a competitor modem. For awhile some iPhones shipped with Intel cellular modems if you recall. Those modems are essentially designed by Infineon wireless solutions whatever, wherever the group was then. Intel was in mismanagement from 2014 to 2021 or so, and the modem business cratered.

    Apple bought the remnants, which presumably has a lot old time of Infineon employees, to design their own modems. We might see it this year or next. Who knows.

    So, perhaps the angle is that Infineon used to be a big part of the smartphone business, as was Nokia, Siemens, etc, in the aughts. As is usual, the incumbents during the dumbphone, er featurephone, era couldn't transition to the smartphone era. A lot of those companies were European. In the end, Infineon just didn't want to pay Qualcomm a patent license for CDMA so they could sell modems in the USA. So, perhaps, the fine was just the pound of Qualcomm's flesh that needed to be carved out because of their patent shenanigans and CDMA exclusively in the USA.
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.