Hollywood Critics Association Awards recognizes Apple TV+ as most nominated streaming serv...

Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited July 2022
Apple TV+ has received more than 50 nominations across a wide range of genres, including docuseries, comedy, drama, anthology series, and variety sketch series.

Apple TV+
Apple TV+


On Thursday, the Hollywood Critics Association announced that Apple had received a record 53 nominations. "Severance," the popular psychological thriller, picked up 12 nominations, including Best Drama Streaming series.

For the second year in a row, "Ted Lasso" is the most-nominated comedy series, totaling 12 nominations. It's picked up nominations for Best Streaming Series, Best Actor for Jason Sudeikis, Best Supporting Actress for Hannah Waddingham and Juno Temple, Best Supporting Actor for Brett Goldstein, Nick Mohammed, and Toheeb Jimoh, plus four writing and directing nominations.

More broadly, Apple had three series nominated for Best Streaming Series, Drama, including "The Morning Show," "Pachinko," and "Severance."

It picked up four nominations for Best Streaming Series, Comedy, with "The Afterparty," "Dickinson," "Shmigadoon!" and "Ted Lasso."

"Acapulco" and "Pachinko" both received nominations for Best International Series, and "Prehistoric Planet" was nominated for Best Streaming Docuseries or Non-Fiction Series.

The list is rather long and can be viewed on Apple's Apple TV+ press site.

Apple also points out that Apple Original films, documentaries, and series have earned 246 wins and 1,062 award nominations and counting. In 2022, Apple TV+ snagged an Oscar for Best Picture with "CODA."

Founded in 2016, the Hollywood Critics Association was "created to acknowledge the importance of online critics and encourage, support, and promote underrepresented voices within the industry," according to the HCA website.

The Hollywood Critics Association Awards will be presented at The Beverly Hilton in Los Angeles on August 14.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    RudeBoyRudyRudeBoyRudy Posts: 106member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.

    my head hurts after reading this


  • Reply 3 of 9
    jeff fieldsjeff fields Posts: 159member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
    No. 

    Not even close to true. Two minutes of research could have answered this for you. The vast majority of Apple TV+ content was funded, conceived, hired for, and supported from the very beginning by Apple.

    And so yes, it is Apple who should get the credit. Obviously.
    StrangeDays
  • Reply 4 of 9
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
    No. 

    Not even close to true. Two minutes of research could have answered this for you. The vast majority of Apple TV+ content was funded, conceived, hired for, and supported from the very beginning by Apple.

    And so yes, it is Apple who should get the credit. Obviously.
    CODA was filmed summer 2019 and Apple purchased the rights to distribute it on January 30, 2021. That took me under two minutes of research. You've proven my point. THANKS! Apple didn't fund the production of CODA because the movie was filmed 18 months before Apple provided any money.

    After pondering why you were wrong, I think what you imagined was that I was thinking that most/all of Apple's products were filmed before Apple got involved. Go back and read my post again. I said "most companies purchase movies after they have been funded." I didn't say "ALL movies", I said "movies." And the fact that CODA was purchased after it was made proved my statement to be correct.
    edited July 2022
  • Reply 5 of 9
    BeatsBeats Posts: 3,073member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
    No. 

    Not even close to true. Two minutes of research could have answered this for you. The vast majority of Apple TV+ content was funded, conceived, hired for, and supported from the very beginning by Apple.

    And so yes, it is Apple who should get the credit. Obviously.
    CODA was filmed summer 2019 and Apple purchased the rights to distribute it on January 30, 2021. That took me under two minutes of research. You've proven my point. THANKS! Apple didn't fund the production of CODA because the movie was filmed 18 months before Apple provided any money.

    After pondering why you were wrong, I think what you imagined was that I was thinking that most/all of Apple's products were filmed before Apple got involved. Go back and read my post again. I said "most companies purchase movies after they have been funded." I didn't say "ALL movies", I said "movies." And the fact that CODA was purchased after it was made proved my statement to be correct.

    A little of both are true but most Apple content isn’t revealed until after it’s finished. If your first post was true, Warner Bros. Disney, Sony etc. would be waiting around until some independent guys finish their next movie.

    I do wish Apple didn’t include 3rd party producers in Apple TV Plus. It’s awkward as  heck seeing 3rd party logos on a first party service. This is where Netflix does it right.
  • Reply 6 of 9
    larryjwlarryjw Posts: 1,031member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
    No. 

    Not even close to true. Two minutes of research could have answered this for you. The vast majority of Apple TV+ content was funded, conceived, hired for, and supported from the very beginning by Apple.

    And so yes, it is Apple who should get the credit. Obviously.
    CODA was filmed summer 2019 and Apple purchased the rights to distribute it on January 30, 2021. That took me under two minutes of research. You've proven my point. THANKS! Apple didn't fund the production of CODA because the movie was filmed 18 months before Apple provided any money.

    After pondering why you were wrong, I think what you imagined was that I was thinking that most/all of Apple's products were filmed before Apple got involved. Go back and read my post again. I said "most companies purchase movies after they have been funded." I didn't say "ALL movies", I said "movies." And the fact that CODA was purchased after it was made proved my statement to be correct.
    You didn't have a point to begin with. Smugness about being "right" doesn't fit the facts. 

    "I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase ______ movies and properties ...."
     
    You had nothing to say. Missing qualification where an adjective phrase would might make this a statement which could render it true or false. (A statement by definition is some language which can have a value of true or false). 

    So, what fits in the blank spot? "most", "all", "some", "a few", ....  But, having not made a statement, you didn't say anything worth saying or responding to. So, someone filled in the missing blank and answered -- completing a thought which you never had.

    muthuk_vanalingamStrangeDaysstompyJaphey
  • Reply 7 of 9
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,881member
    I'm no expert, but don't most movie distributors, including Apple, purchase movies and properties after they have been funded, filmed and finalized by private producers? If so, it's not really the distributor who should get the credit for all the awards.

    In the case of TV shows, it's probably just the pilot episodes that are funded privately, after which the producers shop around for a distributor to fund the whole season.
    No. 

    Not even close to true. Two minutes of research could have answered this for you. The vast majority of Apple TV+ content was funded, conceived, hired for, and supported from the very beginning by Apple.

    And so yes, it is Apple who should get the credit. Obviously.
    CODA was filmed summer 2019 and Apple purchased the rights to distribute it on January 30, 2021. That took me under two minutes of research. You've proven my point. THANKS! Apple didn't fund the production of CODA because the movie was filmed 18 months before Apple provided any money.

    After pondering why you were wrong, I think what you imagined was that I was thinking that most/all of Apple's products were filmed before Apple got involved. Go back and read my post again. I said "most companies purchase movies after they have been funded." I didn't say "ALL movies", I said "movies." And the fact that CODA was purchased after it was made proved my statement to be correct.
    You said  “movies and properties” - to me that implied TV shows as other than movies. 

    Regardless, most of Apple’s nominations aren’t for CODA. And all networks bid on un-distributed movies.

    Then you asserted Apple likewise shopped for already produced TV (pilots), which is also false for much of Apple’s original content. TV producers pitch shows in meetings then make a deal with one. That’s a two-way process and of course the network should get credit for who they partner with. After the season has episodes to show the network decides whether to renew it. Some shows may be already produced in foreign markets and a network may license it (obviously Netflix does this a ton as well). 

    So your attempt to specifically discredit Apple is entirely stupid for multiple reasons. 
    edited July 2022
  • Reply 8 of 9
    retrogustoretrogusto Posts: 1,112member
    One could argue that what makes a studio/distributor great is its ability to recognize quality and talent at whatever stage of production is appropriate, use their funding to secure the rights, help facilitate the completion of the production as needed, draw attention to the projects through various types of publicity, and share them with the world. These are the measures of success for a role like theirs, and in that respect Apple seems to be doing great, especially considering that they haven’t been doing it for all that long, and they also excel in other very different areas, such as their quite successful smartphone business. 
  • Reply 9 of 9
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    About 2900 out of Paramount's 4100 films were "acquired" by purchasing their rights after they had been produced. That's 70%. Maybe Apple's rate is lower than 70%, but I proved my case that some of Apple's films were acquired. So I was dead right when I said "Most movie distributors...".
Sign In or Register to comment.