Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 review: Professional printer for photographers

Posted:
in General Discussion
The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is a professional-grade photo printer capable of A2 prints, but while it is high-cost, it's a good choice for those serious about photography.

The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is big, but it is a professional-grade printer.
The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is big, but it is a professional-grade printer.


One of the most significant elements of photography is presenting your work to others. You could have the best camera in the world and spend hours editing the images in software, but it means nothing if you can't show it in the way you want.

In years gone by, that would've meant sending off the images to a printer so that they can be printed at a scale and on a paper quality of your choice. Nowadays, sending to a specialist is still an option, but home printers have become acceptable enough for the task.



Going to A3 is possible as some printers are offering that facility. Going any further is tougher territory to crack. The problem quickly becomes one of scale, as while you could print at an A4 size relatively easily, going beyond is difficult without outsourcing to a printing firm.

You can print on paper up to A2 in size. (A3 for scale)
You can print on paper up to A2 in size. (A3 for scale)


At A3, you're entering the realm of professional photo printers, high-quality and pretty expensive devices that can offer prints at the same quality as professional firms. Large format printers can provide huge prints and are often used at printshops, including for low-run or one-off jobs.

At the high end, you could end up paying thousands for professional printers. But, on the value section of the range, you could find a sweet spot between getting what you want at a high quality while not breaking the bank.

The A2-capable Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is at the budget-friendly end of the camera maker's professional photo and fine art printer line. Even so, it is still a competent image-output device.

Prosumer-friendly

Boasting the ability to produce professional-grade prints for its users, the Pro-1000 fits the description of both a large-format printer and a more consumer-friendly printer.

While not quite the same level of simplicity as your standard home printer, the Pro-1000 is quite close in many respects. In its basic form, it is a rectangular and boxy printer with flaps that fold out for holding paper to be used and just-printed sheets.

There are also relatively few buttons on the front, a reasonably simple directional control panel next to a relatively sizeable three-inch display, and two chunky buttons for power and canceling a print.

The controls are simple, but you can do complex things with them.
The controls are simple, but you can do complex things with them.


It even connects up in a very user-friendly way, with Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB connections, with the latter used to connect the printer to a Mac or PC physically. You could also use Apple AirPrint support and Canon's various apps, including Canon Print, Pro Gallery Print, Pixma Cloud, or from a camera directly using Wi-Fi Pictbridge.

At a glance, it's very consumer-friendly, or rather, prosumer-oriented. Indeed, for basic operation, there's not much different in using the Pro-1000 than other printers.

Except, there are quite a lot of things that are very unusual that you wouldn't see in a consumer printer.

Big and heavy for a reason

The first clue about the Pro-1000 being a more professional device is its physical size. To print to an A2 sheet of paper, it has to be a much bigger printer than average.

At 28.5 inches wide, 17.1 inches deep, and 11.2 inches tall, it's a considerably bigger printer than most people will be used to. This thing takes up a lot of desk space, even more than that at full stretch.

This printer is big and heavy, and can handle far more than typical A4 paper (A4 for scale)
This printer is big and heavy, and can handle far more than typical A4 paper (A4 for scale)


To take A2 paper, the paper feeder at the top has a fold-out section that can occupy another 11 inches of depth, while similar foldable elements for printed sheets at the front can take up another 17 inches. That's a total of 45 inches needed at full extension.

Then there's the secondary manual feed slot on the back, which similarly folds out. Ideally, to use the printer correctly and to access both paper feeds, you should put it on a rollable table.

It's also considerably heavy, at 71.2 pounds with the print head and loaded with ink. Canon said two people needed to unbox and install it, and at that weight, it's understandable why that would be a requirement.

So many inks

Once you've got it out of the box, the setup process leans towards a more professional installation. Following a guide, you're instructed to insert the quite large printhead and lock it into place, using a special supplied sheet to ensure everything is lining up correctly, and then you get to install the ink.

The print head is massive, but needed in the Canon imagePrograf PRO-1000.
The print head is massive, but needed in the Canon imagePrograf PRO-1000.


A typical printer may have two print cartridges handling black and colors respectively, or may break out that second into multiple cartridges, so there's a CMYK collection at play. That's not the case for the Pro-1000, as you have a total of 12 inks in a set.

A complete set of inks consists of 11 colors, including Matte and Photo versions of Black, Cyan, Magenta, and Gray, as well as Yellow, Red, and Blue. The 12th is a "Chroma Optimizer" tank, accentuating the print by leveling out the droplet heights for a smoother finish.

A full set of the 12 ink tanks, each containing a generous 80ml per color, costs $699 in its own right, or around $60 a piece. That seems high, but you must remember that this is a professional-grade printer.

The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 needs 12 ink cartridges. That gets expensive to replace very quickly.
The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 needs 12 ink cartridges. That gets expensive to replace very quickly.


One more consumable is ink-related, with the Maintenance Cartridge used to absorb and store excess ink, such as deposits after cleaning the print head. The cartridge is reasonably cheap at around $16.

You get a complete set of inks from the start, so that's not an extra outlay. You also get multiple warnings when your print levels are low, well in advance of when you need to replace them, giving you a chance to source replacement inks or another full set.

This explains the giant print head, a "Bubble-jet on Demand" type that has to handle all 12 colors. That print head also enables a maximum print resolution of 2,400 by 1,200 dpi.

With the high resolution of printing and the potentially large sheets of paper that could be used, the Pro-1000 is still reasonably fast in printing a page. A full A2 print takes roughly four minutes to be completed, with the speed varying based on if it's the first print of a run as well as the complexity of the image.

Paper options galore

The inks are one thing, but the paper is another.

The key feature of this printer is that it can handle A2-size prints, but it can also deal with pages at smaller sizes, including A5 and B5, or even as low as a 4-by-6-inch print. Using this printer for small prints may be overkill but still an option.

A2 isn't even the biggest size it can take, as you can print on a sheet up to 1,200mm (3 foot 11.24 inches) in length.

As for the types of paper you can print to, it can handle plain paper as well as matte and gloss, including Canon's types such as "Pro Premium Matte," "Semi-Gloss," "Glossy II," and "Luster."

An example of the paper sizes you can set for the Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000
An example of the paper sizes you can set for the Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000


You can also use paper from other manufacturers, with Canon including fine art paper and canvas options in its settings. It can handle thick paper, too, with manual feeding supporting 400g/m2 weights and papers up to 0.7mm in thickness.

Canon warns the manual feed should be used for thicker pages in general.

While all of these settings can typically be configured when printing from within your chosen application, you can also manage some of the settings from the printer's interface. That is, you can tell the printer the size and type of paper loaded to optimize the print for that particular medium.

Extremely professional

It should be evident that this is a professional-grade printer that has enough capability to be used by regular users without needing to fuss around too much to get something printed.

However, for those who want to dig deeper, many elements are decidedly aimed at professionals.

There are many different options and settings you can trigger from the printer's menu.
There are many different options and settings you can trigger from the printer's menu.


Digging around the menu system on the printer itself, you can find many different maintenance and settings options. Here, you'll also discover neat features, like the vacuum feed system that keeps paper flat, something you wouldn't find on domestic printers.

Since ink can be expensive and businesses need to account for the cost of products, it's interesting that the logs for print jobs also show how much ink was consumed per run. This detail can help determine which print jobs are burning through ink supplies quicker, or in the case of multi-user environments, help work out who is responsible for high ink usage.

These features aren't just limited to the on-device menu. Canon offers a lot of extra software to work with the printer, aimed largely at professional users.

The most essential is the Quick Utility Toolbox, which lets you see ink levels, configure media, calibrate the color of paper, and deal with cloud services. The Professional Print & Layout app can handle laying out prints and performing color management tasks, with Print Studio Pro also helping with photo print settings.

Canon Accounting Manager can tell you, with high precision, how much each print job cost.
Canon Accounting Manager can tell you, with high precision, how much each print job cost.


Then there are more exotic utilities such as Accounting Manager, which manages the cost of printer usage based on information about the print job. This app is helpful for professional printers as a cost management tool.

There are more than enough ways for a professional printer to take advantage of the power of the Pro-1000. It's more than a typical user or enthusiast may need, but the option is always there.

Single-track mind

Aside from size, weight, and cost, one of the big drawbacks of professional-grade equipment is that it is made with a small range of tasks in mind. In the case of the Pro-1000, it's specifically just a printer.

This doesn't sound like a genuine complaint, except that some users may consider that multi-function printers are big and bulky but offer a bit more utility. For example, a multi-function printer may have a scanning bed, opening itself up to tasks like photocopying or faxing.

Multi-function printers are handy because they do a lot more and are especially office-friendly devices. However, you're not going to get the image quality as you would with this printer.

The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 can tell you how much ink was used in a print job to the thousandth of a milliliter, per ink color.
The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 can tell you how much ink was used in a print job to the thousandth of a milliliter, per ink color.


Heck, a multi-function printer can often provide duplex printing, where it prints on both sides of a sheet in quick succession. If you want to print on both sides, you have to wait for the software to tell you it's finished printing one side, then manually reload the paper into the tray to print the other face.

You don't get any of those extra quality-of-life features here. The Pro-1000 is strictly about taking an image and putting it onto a page as accurately and perfectly as possible.

That's not entirely a bad thing, as the extra features of a multi-function printer can be achieved by using a separate scanner and digital fax services.

Overkill for most

The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 A2 printer is a fantastic addition to a serious photographer's arsenal. It's one thing to be able to print your images yourself, it's another to do so well.

It's yet another to see the high print quality and being able to scale it up to an A4 sheet. Let alone the plethora of paper options and the vast number of ways you can tweak and configure the printer for your specific needs.

As a large and heavy box with a reasonably high-priced barrier to entry at $1,299, it's beyond what you would consider a printer for the occasional photographer.

While the inks are expensive to replace at scale, it's still reasonably cheap compared with using a specialist print firm in the long run.
While the inks are expensive to replace at scale, it's still reasonably cheap compared with using a specialist print firm in the long run.


This is better suited for photographers who want to print off their images for posterity or are serious about it being either a side-hustle or a career choice. Being able to offer professional-grade prints to clients very quickly and without relying on a third-party print house to create them can be a very empowering and exciting.

Paying for a Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is a massive step for photographers to take. It's one that they should.

Pros
  • Professional print quality
  • Up to A2 in size, panorama printing
  • Reasonably easy to get going
  • Professional settings and software available
Cons
  • Size and weight
  • High cost of printer and inks
  • Lengthy preparation time before printing
  • No duplex printing

Rating: 4 out of 5

Where to buy

The Canon imagePrograf Pro-1000 is available from Amazon for $1,299, with it also at Adorama for $1,299 and B&H Photo for the same price.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    omasouomasou Posts: 572member
    Other than parents. Do people really use inkjet printers to print photographs? Unless time is an issue seem like this is a very, very, very expensive way to generate a picture, especially anything larger than 4x6.

    I never really understood inkjets vs. lasers. Yes lasers are/were more expensive than inkjets though my latest HP Color LaserJet wasn't. Consumer inkjets didn't do what "I" needed very well. Printing 4x6 pictures were horrible and easier to just send to Walmart (again not pro quality) and shipping labels had to be covered w/packing tape to protect them from bleeding and fading during shipping.

    To each their own.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    I owned a Canon ImagePrograf 5000 for several years. Very nice printer, pro quality. Printed up to 17" wide to museum-quality archival paper.

    BUT it became obsolete after about six years because Canon refused to keep the drivers up-to-date. I couldn't even download the older ones to put on an obsolete Mac that had the OS necessary to run the printer/software.

    Otherwise the printer had many years of life left in it.

    FU CANON YOU ARE DEAD TO ME
    edited July 2022 JWSCdewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 9
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,213member
    I bought this printer roughly 5 years ago for my side photo business and things started out really good, an added profitable service I could offer. It requires a bit of time and patience to dial in the color profiles but prints are 100% studio quality. The big issue is the same one as with my much larger 65" printers: Ya got to keep 'em busy, and stick to a strict maintenance schedule. 

    That's no problem for my commercial printers which stay working 4-8 hours per workday. This Canon Pro-100 at home that started out producing prints at least once a week and oftimes more, and for several prints in a session, now sits idle most of the time. No one really expects prints today, or is at least willing to spend much for them. 90% of the time the images I sell are only for digital display and social sharing. I don't do art shows so the need for a professional grade printer for a side gig just isn't there anymore.

    But unless I still do regularr maintenance on the Pro-100 I end up risking print heads drying out. Even doing weekly maintenance (most weeks) I still have to spend significant time recovering nozzles when I need to do prints because the machine isn't being used regularly. In addition ink is still being consumed with no prints being produced and that ink is in the tiny ink cartridges is approaching the same price as the 1/2 liter plus ink packs for my commercial machines! A full set of inks for the Canon will set you back $700 or more. 

    If I had a do-over I'd choose to do the staging and photos and processing, but if a client wants physical prints let them source their own. There's no profit to be made doing them myself and in general clients aren't asking for them either. 

    edited July 2022 sconosciutomuthuk_vanalingamAlex_VJWSCFileMakerFellerdewme
  • Reply 4 of 9
    JWSCJWSC Posts: 1,203member
    I owned a Canon ImagePrograf 5000 for several years. Very nice printer, pro quality. Printed up to 17" wide to museum-quality archival paper.

    BUT it became obsolete after about six years because Canon refused to keep the drivers up-to-date. I couldn't even download the older ones to put on an obsolete Mac that had the OS necessary to run the printer/software.

    Otherwise the printer had many years of life left in it.

    FU CANON YOU ARE DEAD TO ME
    Sorry to hear that. It would’ve been nice if they could’ve updated the drivers for more recent OS iterations. But you did get six good years out of a piece of hardware.  That’s not bad.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 9
    Sure it's not the "Pro Canon Pro imagePrograf Pro-1000 Printer Pro"?

    I seriously wonder about the thought process followed by some marketing folks.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 9
    JWSC said:
    I owned a Canon ImagePrograf 5000 for several years. Very nice printer, pro quality. Printed up to 17" wide to museum-quality archival paper.

    BUT it became obsolete after about six years because Canon refused to keep the drivers up-to-date. I couldn't even download the older ones to put on an obsolete Mac that had the OS necessary to run the printer/software.

    Otherwise the printer had many years of life left in it.

    FU CANON YOU ARE DEAD TO ME
    Sorry to hear that. It would’ve been nice if they could’ve updated the drivers for more recent OS iterations. But you did get six good years out of a piece of hardware.  That’s not bad.
    I beg to differ. It's absolute bullshit. I spent $1000 on just the printer. It had 12 separate inkjet cartridges (they were much larger than a home printer's) that cost around $100 each.

    Like I said, the printer had many years of life left in it mechanically speaking. The only reason it became useless is because Canon refused to continue updating the drivers (somewhat understandable) and wouldn't even make available the old drivers. The latter cost them NOTHING other than whatever miniscule incremental cost for hosting them on their server.

    And, if I had known in advance they would make the printer obsolete in this manner I NEVER WOULD HAVE PURCHASED IT.
    watto_cobraOlgaT55
  • Reply 7 of 9
    omasou said:
    Other than parents. Do people really use inkjet printers to print photographs? Unless time is an issue seem like this is a very, very, very expensive way to generate a picture, especially anything larger than 4x6.

    I never really understood inkjets vs. lasers. Yes lasers are/were more expensive than inkjets though my latest HP Color LaserJet wasn't. Consumer inkjets didn't do what "I" needed very well. Printing 4x6 pictures were horrible and easier to just send to Walmart (again not pro quality) and shipping labels had to be covered w/packing tape to protect them from bleeding and fading during shipping.

    To each their own.
    First of all, you can get decent results with any inkjet printer, much better than laser, but only on specially coated photo paper. Unlike laser, where toner / ink sets on top of paper surface, plain paper inkjet prints will look pale and washed out because ink gets absorbed INTO the paper. Inkjet photo papers have a sticky, dense surface coating that traps the ink droplets and allows for great color reproduction. But, consumer inkjet printers use dye-based inks, water soluble on top of that. They give you nice colors, but are not very resistant. Even if you handle the print properly (frame it under glass or put in an album), it will fade relatively quickly as the dyes degrade and evaporate and if the print gets wet, it will likely smudge. Pro photo printers on the other hand use solid pigment-based inks; if you use them in conjunction with special high quality papers (you still can’t use plain paper), you will get a color reproduction other printers can’t touch (especially laser prints that are very contrasty), with fade resistance for decades. It is crucial if you’re going to sell your prints as fine art and expect to build a reputation for a long time. You are most definitely not going to buy a pro inkjet printer and use it to print labels and such…
    tmaywatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    mr lizardmr lizard Posts: 354member
    imagePrograf Pro-1000”

    They could do with another “pro” in the name somewhere. 
    watto_cobraMacPro
  • Reply 9 of 9
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,727member
    gatorguy said:
    I bought this printer roughly 5 years ago for my side photo business and things started out really good, an added profitable service I could offer. It requires a bit of time and patience to dial in the color profiles but prints are 100% studio quality. The big issue is the same one as with my much larger 65" printers: Ya got to keep 'em busy, and stick to a strict maintenance schedule. 

    That's no problem for my commercial printers which stay working 4-8 hours per workday. This Canon Pro-100 at home that started out producing prints at least once a week and oftimes more, and for several prints in a session, now sits idle most of the time. No one really expects prints today, or is at least willing to spend much for them. 90% of the time the images I sell are only for digital display and social sharing. I don't do art shows so the need for a professional grade printer for a side gig just isn't there anymore.

    But unless I still do regularr maintenance on the Pro-100 I end up risking print heads drying out. Even doing weekly maintenance (most weeks) I still have to spend significant time recovering nozzles when I need to do prints because the machine isn't being used regularly. In addition ink is still being consumed with no prints being produced and that ink is in the tiny ink cartridges is approaching the same price as the 1/2 liter plus ink packs for my commercial machines! A full set of inks for the Canon will set you back $700 or more. 

    If I had a do-over I'd choose to do the staging and photos and processing, but if a client wants physical prints let them source their own. There's no profit to be made doing them myself and in general clients aren't asking for them either. 

    I could not agree more.  I sold my Epson 44" professional printer, which cost thousands, and had all the same issues you mention, once I realized it was a money loser.  For my personal larger prints, I picked up the incredibly inexpensive Canon p8720 and could not be happier with the results.  Larger sizes I just have done outside now.
    gatorguy
Sign In or Register to comment.