Banks teaming up to fight Apple Wallet & PayPal
Seven major banks are working with money-transfer service Zelle to create a separate digital wallet system to compete with Apple Wallet.

According to the Wall Street Journal, banks including Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, and Bank of America are planning a new system for using online shopping using a digital wallet that is linked to their credit and debit cards. It's Apple's Wallet, but not including Apple, and the intention is to begin rolling it out in the second half of 2023.
Instead, the new digital wallet is to be run by Early Warning Services (EWS), which is firm owned by banks and currently operates the Zelle service. EWS says the as-yet unnamed new wallet will be separate from Zelle.
Unnamed sources say that the new wallet is also intended to compete with PayPal. It is being built in order to prevent banks ceding customer relationships to big tech, like Apple.
It's also a move to cut down on fraud, which Zelle has reportedly been prone to. A plan to extend Zelle into online purchases was cancelled over fraud and disputed transactions.
Details of how the new system will work are still being worked on. The Wall Street Journal says that it is likely to involve users typing their email address into a merchant's checkout page. That merchant could then contact EWS, which in turn confirms with the banks, and the customer's relevant cards are then presented.
EWS plans to initially launch the service supporting Visa and Mastercard, for a total of around 150 million customers. If the system proves popular, it may expand into allowing direct payments from banks to merchants.
Apple Wallet already has a competitor in the form of Google Wallet. In theory, Meta and Samsung are competitors in the space too, but neither has much market traction.
Similarly, a consortium of firms including JP Morgan Chase previously attempted to supplant Apple Pay with CurrentC, a rival that ultimately failed.
Read on AppleInsider

According to the Wall Street Journal, banks including Wells Fargo, JP Morgan Chase, and Bank of America are planning a new system for using online shopping using a digital wallet that is linked to their credit and debit cards. It's Apple's Wallet, but not including Apple, and the intention is to begin rolling it out in the second half of 2023.
Instead, the new digital wallet is to be run by Early Warning Services (EWS), which is firm owned by banks and currently operates the Zelle service. EWS says the as-yet unnamed new wallet will be separate from Zelle.
Unnamed sources say that the new wallet is also intended to compete with PayPal. It is being built in order to prevent banks ceding customer relationships to big tech, like Apple.
It's also a move to cut down on fraud, which Zelle has reportedly been prone to. A plan to extend Zelle into online purchases was cancelled over fraud and disputed transactions.
Details of how the new system will work are still being worked on. The Wall Street Journal says that it is likely to involve users typing their email address into a merchant's checkout page. That merchant could then contact EWS, which in turn confirms with the banks, and the customer's relevant cards are then presented.
EWS plans to initially launch the service supporting Visa and Mastercard, for a total of around 150 million customers. If the system proves popular, it may expand into allowing direct payments from banks to merchants.
Apple Wallet already has a competitor in the form of Google Wallet. In theory, Meta and Samsung are competitors in the space too, but neither has much market traction.
Similarly, a consortium of firms including JP Morgan Chase previously attempted to supplant Apple Pay with CurrentC, a rival that ultimately failed.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
“Details of how the new system will work are still being worked on”. Lol. And they plan to launch it “this year”. What bizarre, parallel world do these people live in?
The other thing to know about Zelle is once it is sent, there is no way to recall the payment if subsequent fraud or a simple mistake occurs unlike a standard credit card transaction.
Indeed!
A fundamental reason I don't use Harris Teeter's own wallet system (or any other app's wallet system) is because you actually have to store your actual credit card number with them. F**K that! That's just another layer of weak security. In the days of early internet, I would store my credit card info with merchants, but no longer. Have we not learnt that these systems are not that secured? Apple's Wallet system, at least for the Apple Card, doesn't store the actual credit number, so there's some layer of protection there.
I can't image that their new proposed offering will amount to anything special. As it is, they already have on their plates their implementation of FedNow and the proposed Fed's CBDC (central bank digital currency).
I hate it. It's kludgy and risky. Apple Pay in my Wallet is easy as pie, I don't see how the banks are going to beat Apple on this one. It has taken me no time at all to do all my transactions with Apple Pay, other than the handful like Target that make you pay thru their own app and the cheap mofo's who refused to buy the contactless terminals. I put up with that because 5% back; why on Earth would I bother with whatever kludgy crap these banks come up with, which won't beat the 2% or 3% back I get from AC and will surely be more difficult to use than Wallet.
The convenience of these services, though, is for friends/family to send money to each other. You can't really do that with a credit card. I can perform a service for a client and they pay me with Zelle which instantly appears in my bank account.
on this Zelle update that is not called Zelle, why in the hell would customer want to participate in a system that requires your email address to function? You wouldn’t of course. What it really means is you have to have an account with the merchant, or franchise or whatever. What that means in a practical sense is that the participating retailer is of a decent size and has a customer tracking capability. Little guys are out or have to pay for a service delivered by some third party.
This is not in the interests of users. Or small business.