Tennessee man charged with using AirTag to stalk ex-wife

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iOS
In yet another case of a stalker using Apple's AirTags -- and of the AirTags alerting the victim -- police near Memphis have arrested a woman's ex-husband.




Carlos Atkins is not the first man to be charged with what the Fox News local affiliate station reports is defined as "electronic tracking of a motor vehicle." Depending on the outcome of police proceedings, he won't the first stalker to be jailed because of AirTags, either.

This case is more creepy than usual, however, as Atkins is alleged to have tracked down his victim's car in order to put roses on it. His unnamed ex-wife found the AirTag in her car, and reportedly Atkins has confessed that he placed it there.

He is said to have claimed he wanted to see his and his ex-wife's children.

It's unclear how old the children are, however, as the victim reportedly phoned Atkins's daughter to ask her to stop the harassment. Atkins later somehow contacted the victim through her nephew's phone, and it was during this call that he is said to have admitted to following her.

Apple's response

Fox News does not report whether Atkins is expected to go trial. However, it does say that in response to the case, Apple has commented on the issue of stalking.

"AirTag was designed to help people locate their personal belongings, not to track people or another person's property," an Apple spokesperson said, "and we condemn in the strongest possible terms any malicious use of our products."

"Unwanted tracking has long been a societal problem, and we took this concern seriously in the design of AirTag," continued Apple. "It's why the Find My network is built with privacy in mind, uses end-to-end encryption, and why we innovated with the first-ever proactive system to alert you of unwanted tracking."

"We hope this starts an industry trend for others to also provide these sorts of proactive warnings in their products," said the spokesperson.

Apple's AirTags, and problems with them, have shone a light on the levels of stalking using electronic devices. It's highly likely that the success of Apple's tracking device, and even the number of reports of stalkers being caught, has led to an increase in such stalking.

However, Apple is simultaneously the most proactive in helping alert victims of stalking. Tile, its best-known competitor, for instance had no anti-stalking measures at all for the first nine years after its launch.

Recently, Tile says it "immediately jumped into action" concerning stalking fears. It has now launched an update that simultaneously threatens stalkers with a $1 million, and makes it impossible for victims to detect they are being tracked by a Tile.

Apple's AirTags can take between hours and days to alert a user -- so that they are not notified by every passing device -- and that is arguably too long. Consequently, a security firm has announced a crowdfunding campaign for a palm-sized AirTags detector.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,324member
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. For starters, the headline could just as easily have read, "Another Stalker Charged as Apple AirTag's Safety Features Protect Potential Victim." 

    Another interesting contextual data point would be the number of AirTag stalking cases divided by the number of AirTags sold. I'd bet a dollar to a donut that there are a lot of consecutive zeroes following the decimal point in that calculation.  

    Another interesting contextual data point would be the same calculation for Tile. I'd bet a dollar to a donut that number has even more leading zeroes, not because it doesn't ever happen, but because Tile didn't bother with anti-stalking features for nine years, then briefly introduced them, but now is doubling down with its "Anti-Theft Mode," which removes the anti-stalking features and adds a $1M fine for customers caught using the devices for stalking. Moving forward, it'll be interesting to see how many times it actually tries to collect that fine, and how many of those cases are actually successful. 
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 10
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    AppleZulu said:
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. 
    Apple gets the eyeballs, Tile and others don’t. Yes, it’s that simple when the media is involved.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 10
    chadbagchadbag Posts: 2,029member
    Tile can’t levy a fine.  They can file a civil suit to try and claim the $1m.   
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 10
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,324member
    lkrupp said:
    AppleZulu said:
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. 
    Apple gets the eyeballs, Tile and others don’t. Yes, it’s that simple when the media is involved.
    I get that, but it feels pretty intentionally click-bait-y for an Apple-centric site to repeatedly produce reports on this subject under headlines that portray Apple as the bad guy. The people writing for this site are fully aware of what the real deal is, but continue pushing out headlines that appear intended to attract traffic at the expense of what they know to be the truth. 
    lkruppwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 10
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,935member
    lkrupp said:
    AppleZulu said:
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. 
    Apple gets the eyeballs, Tile and others don’t. Yes, it’s that simple when the media is involved.
    Yup. "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss" would not garner any media attention at all.

    But "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss for using AirTag to track his wife"would set the internet on fire.
    lkruppwatto_cobra
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 10
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    dewme said:
    lkrupp said:
    AppleZulu said:
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. 
    Apple gets the eyeballs, Tile and others don’t. Yes, it’s that simple when the media is involved.
    Yup. "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss" would not garner any media attention at all.

    But "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss for using AirTag to track his wife"would set the internet on fire.
    There were and are a myriad of GPS trackers available long before the AirTag and we NERVE EVER heard about them by brand in the news. It was always “a tracking device”. But now it’s “an Apple AirTag” and no one can come up with an article in which a Tile or a Garmin was used to stalk a girlfriend, can they.
    watto_cobra
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 10
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 8,177member
    lkrupp said:
    dewme said:
    lkrupp said:
    AppleZulu said:
    While this story at least acknowledges that Apple is the first tracking device maker that bothered to include anti-stalking features, there's still a decided imbalance in the reporting of these incidents. 
    Apple gets the eyeballs, Tile and others don’t. Yes, it’s that simple when the media is involved.
    Yup. "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss" would not garner any media attention at all.

    But "Texas man charged with using Stanley hammer to bludgeon his ex-boss for using AirTag to track his wife"would set the internet on fire.
    There were and are a myriad of GPS trackers available long before the AirTag and we NERVE EVER heard about them by brand in the news. It was always “a tracking device”. But now it’s “an Apple AirTag” and no one can come up with an article in which a Tile or a Garmin was used to stalk a girlfriend, can they.
    https://abc13.com/houston-woman-harassment-high-tech-device-stalking/3719155/
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 10
    I'd like an update to the "AirTag found moving with you" process, specifically for "Family Sharing". 

    It should be possible to disable the alert for members of a "Family", although not necessarily by default. The case of stalking an ex-partner is not an issue because he/she would already have left that Family.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 10
    I get the anti-stalking feature being important,, but doesnt that also compromise you possibly catching a would-be thief? I’m imagining my prized race bike being stolen (again), and the thief getting a message on his phone that an AirTag is following him… Great, now he knows that I have an AirTag hidden on my bike, and subsequently destroys it. There’s gotta be a better solution!!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 10
    lkrupplkrupp Posts: 10,557member
    I get the anti-stalking feature being important,, but doesnt that also compromise you possibly catching a would-be thief? I’m imagining my prized race bike being stolen (again), and the thief getting a message on his phone that an AirTag is following him… Great, now he knows that I have an AirTag hidden on my bike, and subsequently destroys it. There’s gotta be a better solution!!
    AirTags are not meant to be used to ‘catch a would-be thief’. Apple has never marketed them for that, has always discouraged their use for that, as well as being used to track people. It’s the misuse of AirTags for purposes they were not designed for that is causing the issues. 
    muthuk_vanalingam
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.