TSMC struggling with early yields of iPhone A17 and M3 Mac processors

Posted:
in General Discussion edited April 2023
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. is having lithography tool troubles with the new chip process that is being used to fabricate the next generation of Apple processors.

TSMC works on 3nm process
TSMC works on 3nm process


It was rumored that Apple had ordered the whole production run of 3nm processors from TSMC as far back as December 2020. At the time, it was anticipated that Apple would use the processors throughout the Mac, iPhone, and iPad.

The manufacturer, TSMC, had just recently finished developing its 3nm process. A report from February suggested that TSMC has dedicated the entire production run to Apple.

However, TSMC has delayed the introduction and ramp-up of 3nm due to a need to adopt multi-patterning with EUV lithography from tool supplier ASML, according to EE Times.

"While the high cost of EUV multi-patterning has made the cost/benefit of EUV unattractive, loosening the design rules to minimize the number of EUV multi-patterning layers has led to a much higher die size," analyst Mehdi Hosseini said. "The 'real' 3-nm node will not scale until a higher-throughput EUV system, ASML's NXE:3800E, is available during the second half of 2023."

TSMC will start increasing production of Apple's A17 and M3 processors on the N3 node in the second half of 2023. For the iPhone A17 chip, TSMC will do 82 mask layers with a die size likely in the 100-110mm square range.

That indicates a yield of approximately 620 chips per wafer with a four-month wafer cycle time. So M3 will probably have a die size of 135 to 150mm square and 450 chips per wafer.

TSMC expects its next node, N2, will start production in 2025.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 5
    TSMC N3 (And N3E maybe) has 50% or lower yield on a 110-130 mm2 chip.

    Insiders say Samsung’s 3GAP updated PDK outperforms TSMC 3nm. The only question now is the yield.

    If Samsung’s 3nm yield exceeds TSMC, expect Apple to move back to Samsung foundry.
  • Reply 2 of 5
    Nothing in the source article (other than the headline and lede!) suggests any of this is unexpected, or that TSMC is "struggling" or "straining" any more than would be expected in such a transition. It even quotes an analyst saying that yields are at a "healthy level at this stage in N3 development." It also points out that Apple's deal with TSMC accounts for lower yields in the early N3 ramp-up stages.

    Anandtech has a decent article exploring the TSMC 3nm roadmap, here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/18833/tsmc-details-3nm-evolution-n3e-on-schedule-n3p-n3x-deliver-five-percent-gains

    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 5
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,308member
    TSMC N3 (And N3E maybe) has 50% or lower yield on a 110-130 mm2 chip.

    Insiders say Samsung’s 3GAP updated PDK outperforms TSMC 3nm. The only question now is the yield.

    If Samsung’s 3nm yield exceeds TSMC, expect Apple to move back to Samsung foundry.
    Other questions are price, schedule, volume, and roadmap. 

    I think it’s more likely that apple would use Intel as a foundry than Samsung. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 5
    blastdoor said:
    TSMC N3 (And N3E maybe) has 50% or lower yield on a 110-130 mm2 chip.

    Insiders say Samsung’s 3GAP updated PDK outperforms TSMC 3nm. The only question now is the yield.

    If Samsung’s 3nm yield exceeds TSMC, expect Apple to move back to Samsung foundry.
    Other questions are price, schedule, volume, and roadmap. 

    I think it’s more likely that apple would use Intel as a foundry than Samsung. 
    Nothing is certain because at this point, both TSMC and Samsung 3nm nodes are garbage. I think Apple is making contingency plans to move out of TSMC if the worst case scenario happens and they’re unable to improve yields. It is far too risky to put all your eggs in one foundry. Even Qualcomm is being extra cautious and is using both TSMC and Samsung 3nm in case one of them fails.
  • Reply 5 of 5
    Nothing in the source article (other than the headline and lede!) suggests any of this is unexpected, or that TSMC is "struggling" or "straining" any more than would be expected in such a transition. It even quotes an analyst saying that yields are at a "healthy level at this stage in N3 development." It also points out that Apple's deal with TSMC accounts for lower yields in the early N3 ramp-up stages.

    Anandtech has a decent article exploring the TSMC 3nm roadmap, here: https://www.anandtech.com/show/18833/tsmc-details-3nm-evolution-n3e-on-schedule-n3p-n3x-deliver-five-percent-gains

    Lol… yeah, because the countless delays, high prices, no customers wanting to adopt N3 are all indications that things are going smoothly.

    you need to stop listening to TSMC marketing department and their astroturfers. Start looking at what TSMC and their customers are doing. Their actions do NOT indicate that yields are even past 50%. For Apple to delay a low volume product like the M3 MacBook while no one else is using N3 indicates that yields are far below the 55% that was quoted in the article.
Sign In or Register to comment.