Congress officially acknowledges Apple's unfair labor practices and union-busting tactics

Posted:
in General Discussion
Members of Congress have taken note of Apple's actions at unionizing stores, and have officially addressed the allegations that the company is chronically preventing its retail staff from organizing at multiple locations.

Apple Country Club Plaza, Kansas City
Apple Country Club Plaza, Kansas City


On Thursday, congresspeople Emanuel Cleaver II from Missouri and Sylvia Garcia from Texas penned a letter to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) expressing concern over Apple's treatment of retail employees.

Specifically, the officials cite incidents that have taken place in Kansas City, Missouri and Houston, Texas.

According to the letter, workers at the Country Club Plaza in Kansas City reported being disciplined and fired over union activity under the guise of tardiness.

One worker at the store had been fired for being an average of one minute late for their shift, even though prior to unionization efforts, it was uncommon for workers to be terminated on such grounds.

In March, Apple was accused of firing a total of five Kansas City staff members in retaliation for their union-organizing efforts.

In Houston's Apple Memorial City, workers were interrogated about their support for union efforts. Management threatened to worsen working conditions if employees continued to organize.

Both stores claimed that management held captive audience meetings promising to improve conditions if workers ceased unionization efforts.

The officials expressed concern that this is an ongoing issue in the company. The pair cite the fact that the NLRB had found evidence of Apple coercing workers and interfering with organization efforts.

As a result, they have requested the NLRB open an investigation into the Kansas City and Houston allegations.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 9
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,707member
    Being accused of something doesn’t mean it happened. Sounds like sour grapes from disgruntled former employees - looking to get back at the company that fired them. 


    jibwilliamhDooofus
  • Reply 2 of 9
    Being accused of something doesn’t mean it happened. Sounds like sour grapes from disgruntled former employees - looking to get back at the company that fired them. 


    Accusing Apple employees of something doesn't mean it happened.
    applebynaturehammeroftruthp-dogchasmbeowulfschmidt
  • Reply 3 of 9
    It doesn't cease to amaze me the number of corporate-billionaire bootlickers on this forum. They don't give one shit about you, yet you get all up in arms to defend them. How dare people barely making a living wage and burdened with corporate BS, be allowed to advocate for their own wealth and well being from the richest corporation in all of history. 
    hammeroftruthgatorguyp-dogchasmJP234muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 4 of 9
    danoxdanox Posts: 2,847member
    It doesn't cease to amaze me the number of corporate-billionaire bootlickers on this forum. They don't give one shit about you, yet you get all up in arms to defend them. How dare people barely making a living wage and burdened with corporate BS, be allowed to advocate for their own wealth and well being from the richest corporation in all of history. 
    Like most corporations, Apple is winning. They have everything in their power to keep winning, except when they get into a fight with another corporation i.e. Samsung or Qualcomm. If employees of companies don’t fight who will? most of the people in Washington DC won’t, the local rent a cop, won’t, the Pinkertons certainly aren’t gonna pick up the pieces. Maybe Nixon and Kissinger will, whoops too late for that. 
    beowulfschmidt
  • Reply 5 of 9
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,166member
    Give the shenanigans and ludicrous bidding proposals at Apple unionised stores, you can understand this mammoth corporation being too interested in unionising the workforce. If those union demands are an example, conditions at Apple retail must be pretty good and the union is struggling to come up with something to earn their dues.
  • Reply 6 of 9
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,291member
    JP234 said:
    Misleading headline by Appleinsider:

    Congress officially acknowledges Apple's unfair labor practices and union-busting tactics

    The next thing you'll read is that 2 (out of 435) representatives sent a letter to the NLRB. Does that sound like an official Congressional acknowledgement to you?
    Yes. Yes it does.

    Things a SINGLE congressperson does in the course of their official duties are official congressional acts. All congresspeople speak on behalf of Congress.
  • Reply 7 of 9
    MadbumMadbum Posts: 536member
    It doesn't cease to amaze me the number of corporate-billionaire bootlickers on this forum. They don't give one shit about you, yet you get all up in arms to defend them. How dare people barely making a living wage and burdened with corporate BS, be allowed to advocate for their own wealth and well being from the richest corporation in all of history. 
    Are you a communist? These retail workers are the highest paid in the country. They got their union, now their union is taking their dues but forgot to tell these members Apple doesn’t  have to agree to shit but their union dues still will need to be paid.

    sure they can strike…. Apple will have such a hard time replacing them!? How will Apple ever find anyone to sell IPhones?  
  • Reply 8 of 9
    chasm said:
    JP234 said:
    Misleading headline by Appleinsider:

    Congress officially acknowledges Apple's unfair labor practices and union-busting tactics

    The next thing you'll read is that 2 (out of 435) representatives sent a letter to the NLRB. Does that sound like an official Congressional acknowledgement to you?
    Yes. Yes it does.

    Things a SINGLE congressperson does in the course of their official duties are official congressional acts. All congresspeople speak on behalf of Congress.
    Nonsense.  If you don't understand why the headline is (intentionally) misleading, I don't know what to say. Yes, members of congress can do things, as can committee chairs, as can committees, as can party caucuses, as can the House or Senate as a whole, etc.  Those are all different things and none of those can be characterized as "Congress _officially_ ...".  The correct/not-misleading wording would be "Member of Congress officially..." or the like. If one Supreme Court Justice says something in a minority opinion for a case (or, even better, during oral arguments), you wouldn't say "The Supreme Court officially ...".  Same thought process.  This isn't complicated.
    tht
Sign In or Register to comment.