2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - compared

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited June 2023

Apple's second-generation Mac Studio is packed with top-tier M2-series chips. Here's how the specs compare against the previous version running M1 Max and M1 Ultra chips.

Apple hasn't changed the Mac Studio's design
Apple hasn't changed the Mac Studio's design



Apple has unveiled an upgraded iteration of the Mac Studio, marking its second generation. The latest version incorporates the M2 Max processor, delivering a remarkable 25% increase in performance while maintaining the same sleek design and form factor as its predecessor.



Here's all you need to know about Apple's latest M1 Ultra chipset and its comparison to the company's previous M-series offerings.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Specifications

SpecificationsMac Studio (M1 Max)Mac Studio (M1 Ultra)Mac Studio (M2 Max)Mac Studio (M2 Ultra)
Launch Price (starting)$1,999.00$3,999.00$1,999.00$3,999.00
Processor10-core M1 Max20-core M1 Ultra12-core M2 Max24-core M2 Ultra
MemoryUp to 64GBUp to 128GBUp to 96GBUp to 192GB
GraphicsUp to 32 coresUp to 64 coresUp to 38 coresUp to 76 cores
Storage512 GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB512 GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB512 GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB512 GB, 1TB, 2TB, 4TB, 8TB
PortsUSB-C x6 (2x 3.1 Gen 2, 4x Thunderbolt)
USB-A x2
HDMI 2.0
SDXC
10GB Ethernet
USB-C x6 (6x Thunderbolt)
USB-A x2
HDMI 2.0
SDXC
10GB Ethernet
USB-C x6 (2x 3.1 Gen 2, 4x Thunderbolt)
USB-A x2
HDMI 2.1
SDXC
10GB Ethernet
USB-C x6 (6x Thunderbolt)
USB-A x2
HDMI 2.1
SDXC
10GB Ethernet
ConnectivityWi-Fi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Wi-Fi 6
Bluetooth 5.0
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Design



Apple has maintained the design, size, and weight of the Mac Studio without making any alterations. The device's dimensions remain consistent, measuring 3.7 inches in height and 7.7 inches in width and depth.

The front of the Mac Studio
The front of the Mac Studio



The Mac Studio models equipped with an M Max chip weigh 5.9 pounds, while the version with an M Ultra chip weighs 7.9 pounds. Similarly, the ports have stayed the same.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Processor



The M-series chips are manufactured using a chipmaking process with a 5-nanometer scale, which results in a reduced physical footprint of the chip die. This reduction in size lowers the cost-per-chip and facilitates improved power efficiency.

The M2 Ultra contains 134 billion transistors, an increase of 20 billion compared to the M1 Ultra, which has 114 billion transistors. Similarly, while the M1 Max has 57 billion transistors, the M2 Max increases that to 67 billion.




The M1 Ultra boasts an exceptionally robust 20-core CPU comprising 16 high-performance and four high-efficiency cores. The M2 Ultra features a 24-core CPU, which includes 16 advanced high-performance cores and eight advanced high-efficiency cores.

This configuration enables up to a 20% increase in performance compared to the M1 Ultra. When using a Mac Studio powered by the M2 Ultra, colorists using DaVinci Resolve will enjoy video processing up to 50% faster than Mac Studio with the M1 Ultra.

The M1 Max chip has a 10-core CPU and a 32-core GPU and supports up to 400GB/s of memory bandwidth, the same as the M2 Max. However, its CPU has 12 cores and up to 38 GPU cores.



Apple's Ultra class of its chips uses a technology called UltraFusion that combines two Max chips. UltraFusion employs a silicon interposer to establish connections between dies through more than 10,000 signals, resulting in a substantial interprocessor bandwidth of over 2.5TB/s with minimal delay.

The architecture of UltraFusion allows the Ultra chips to function as a unified chip when interacting with software. As a result, software code does not need to be rewritten to leverage its exceptional performance.




Geekbench benchmarks for the Mac Studio reveal a single-core performance score of 2,394 and a multi-core score of 12,340 when running on the M1 Max chip. On the other hand, the M1 Ultra chip exhibits comparable single-core performance with a score of 2,379 but significantly outperforms in multi-core performance with a score of 17,551.

We can gain insight into the performance potential of a Mac Studio equipped with an M2 Max chip. For instance, looking at a 2023 MacBook Pro featuring an M2 Max chip, it showcases impressive results with a single-core performance score of 2,729 and a multi-core score of 14,379.

Similarly, on June 13 Geekbench released results for the M2 Ultra inside of the new Mac Pro. The benchmark reveals a single-core score of 2,794 and a multi-core score of 21,453 for the 2023 Mac Pro with the new M2 Ultra.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Graphics



Apple's M-series chips have moved away from relying on separate graphics processors from AMD, Nvidia, or Intel, which were previously used extensively. Instead, they now use integrated GPUs with significantly higher numbers of cores.

To illustrate, let's consider the M1 Max, which offered 24-core or 32-core GPU options, whereas the M1 Ultra surpassed that by providing a doubled capacity. The M1 Ultra featured an integrated GPU with 48 cores or an alternative version with an impressive 64 cores.

In the M2 Max and M2 Ultra, Apple has raised the count of GPU cores compared to their predecessors. The M2 Max now offers a choice between a 30-core GPU or a 38-core variant, while the M2 Ultra takes a significant leap with options of either 60 cores or an even more impressive 76 cores.




Previously, the Mac Studio with an M1 Max or M1 Ultra chip could accommodate four Pro Display XDRs and one 4K display. However, the latest generation can now handle a significantly higher number of displays.

It can support up to eight 4K displays, six 6K displays, or three 8K displays, indicating a notable improvement in both quantity and quality of external display compatibility. The expanded capacity for multiple displays offers advantages to professionals with distinct work requirements, such as graphic designers, video editors, financial traders, and others in similar fields.

The Metal benchmarking scores demonstrate the graphical performance capabilities of the M1 Max and M2 Max chips. The M1 Max achieves a score of 108,295, while the M2 Max shows an improvement with a score of 131,280.

As for the M2 Ultra, it has a Metal benchmark score of 217,040. In contrast, the M1 Ultra chip scores 150,407, indicating the exceptional graphical performance of each chip.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Memory



Apple's M-series chips come with a feature known as Unified Memory, which is integrated directly into the chip itself. This technology enables different chip components to access stored information without requiring it to be held in specific memory pools, as stated by Apple.

The base of the Mac Studio, with its hidden base vents.
The base of the Mac Studio, with its hidden base vents.



When it comes to the M1 Max chip, users had the option to configure it with either 32GB or 64GB of Unified Memory. Those who upgrade to the M1 Ultra chip can add up to 128GB of Unified Memory to their Mac Studio.

The memory configurations for the M2 Max chip, featuring a 30-core GPU, are comparable to the M1 Max. However, individuals who opt for the 38-core GPU can select 96GB of memory.

On the other hand, the M2 Ultra chip, equipped with a 60-core GPU, offers multiple memory options, including 64GB, 128GB, or 192GB. Those memory configurations are the same for the M2 Ultra with a 76-core GPU -- the only difference is the higher price.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Ports



The Mac Studio offers a variety of connectivity options to cater to different user needs and preferences. The M1/M2 Max variants of the Mac Studio are equipped with four Thunderbolt 4 ports, allowing for fast data transfer and versatile connectivity.

On the other hand, the M1/M2 Ultra model goes a step further, providing six Thunderbolt 4 ports, offering even more connectivity options for users with multiple devices or peripherals. These Thunderbolt 4 ports ensure users can connect a wide range of peripherals, such as external displays, storage devices, or docking stations while enjoying high-speed data transfers.

There are variations in the port configuration on the front of the M Max and M Ultra models. The M Max version has two USB-C ports, offering data transfer speeds of up to 10Gb/s.

Ports on the rear of the Mac Studio
Ports on the rear of the Mac Studio



But an M-series Ultra Mac Studio provides Thunderbolt 4 speeds for the USB-C ports, allowing for blazing-fast data transfers of up to 40Gb/s. Regardless of the chip variant, the front of the Mac Studio features a consistent inclusion -- an SDXC card slot (UHS-II).

These card slots enable users to conveniently transfer data directly from SD memory cards, commonly used in cameras and other devices, to their Mac Studio. It simplifies workflows for photographers, videographers, and other professionals who frequently work with SD cards.

The Mac Studio includes 10Gb Ethernet ports in all models to cater to networking needs. These Ethernet ports offer high-speed wired network connectivity, ensuring reliable and fast data transfers for users who require a stable and efficient network connection.

Furthermore, the Mac Studio has HDMI ports to let users connect their computers to external displays or TVs that support HDMI input. HDMI ports ensure easy integration with various display setups and multimedia devices.

Finally, the Mac Studio is equipped with a 3.5 mm headphone jack. That allows users to connect their headphones or external audio devices to the Mac Studio, enabling high-quality audio experiences.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - Pricing



The two generations of the Mac Studio launched at $1,999 with various configurations to add more CPU and GPU cores, memory, storage, and built-in software.

The base configuration of the 2023 Mac Studio features an M2 Max chip, which includes a CPU with 12 cores, a GPU with 30 cores, and a Neural Engine with 16 cores. As for the starting add-ons, it contains 32GB of memory for enhanced performance and a 512GB SSD drive for ample storage capacity.

To fully maximize the hardware capabilities of the 2023 Mac Studio, it incurs an additional cost of $1,799 compared to the previous model. This upgraded version comprises an M2 Ultra chip featuring a 24-core GPU, a 76-core GPU, and a 32-core Neural Engine.

Furthermore, the add-ons for this configuration include an impressive 192GB of memory, enhancing overall performance, and an expansive 8TB SSD for vast storage capacity. These options bring the Mac Studio's price tag to $8,799.

While the M1 counterparts were priced similarly originally, Apple doesn't directly sell the Mac Studio with that chip range anymore. You can still get an M1 Mac Studio via third-party retailers and with a potential saving of a few hundred dollars.

2023 Mac Studio vs 2022 Mac Studio - What to buy



The choice between the 2023 Mac Studio and the 2022 Mac Studio depends on budget, professional requirements, and future-proofing needs.

For professionals relying heavily on graphics-intensive apps or multi-tasking across several high-performance apps, the 2023 Mac Studio is an excellent choice. Its M2 Max and M2 Ultra chips increase performance with more CPU and GPU cores and more transistors.

It also offers more options for memory configurations and can handle a significantly higher number of displays. However, the 2023 Mac Studio is more expensive if you opt for the higher-end configurations.

Therefore, budget considerations could make the 2022 Mac Studio more appealing to many users. The 2022 model, with its M1 Max and M1 Ultra chips, still offers impressive performance for a wide range of tasks and could be more than sufficient for users who don't require the same top-end performance that the 2023 model provides.

The design, size, weight, and ports have remained consistent between the two versions, so the decision hinges on processing power, graphics performance, memory, and price. With Apple shifting to selling only the M2-based models, that does mean you will have to check out other online stores for a potentially cheaper M1-based version.

If budget is not a constraint and top-tier performance is a priority, the 2023 Mac Studio would be the best choice.

However, suppose you're looking for a balance between cost and performance. In that case, the 2022 Mac Studio still offers robust features and capabilities that can efficiently handle most professional and personal computing tasks.

Where to buy Apple's Mac Studio



The 2023 Mac Studio with Apple's M2 Max or M2 Ultra chip can be ordered now at Adorama.com, with exclusive promo code APINSIDER knocking $100 off retail models and $30 off optional AppleCare.

Easily compare Mac Studio deals across Apple resellers in our M2 Mac Studio Price Guide.

Closeout M1 Max and M1 Ultra Mac Studio models are also discounted, with the latest prices at your fingertips in our M1 Mac Studio Price Guide.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 11
    geekmeegeekmee Posts: 637member
    Who cares? You would pass out anyway before you reached the Gs of the 2023 version, unless you are part of the 1%
    Besides, everyone is trying to figure out how they are going to afford a Vision Pro.
    edited June 2023 williamlondonFileMakerFellerwatto_cobrarezwits
  • Reply 2 of 11
    ApplePoorApplePoor Posts: 290member
    My purchase in October of 2022 of a fully optioned M1 Ultra Studio was over $7,400 with my military discount. Apple suggested the trade-in value is $1,500 against the new model that would cost over $8,000 even with military discount. 

    That is a 80% depreciation in one year. My existing unit can handle all of the programs I use efficiently.

    The speeds are to the point of fractions of an eye blink. No sure that more speed is that important as a senior citizen.

    So it will be M3 or M4 before I get the value from using my M1. 
    FileMakerFellerAlex1Nwatto_cobramuthuk_vanalingamAniMilldanoxgatorguy
  • Reply 3 of 11
    netroxnetrox Posts: 1,464member
    This article doesn't really bother to measure performance on Photoshop and Lightroom which many creatives use for photography. As a photographer, it does suck when importing and exporting photos, especially have you take hundreds of high resolution images (50MP+). 

    The M2 Ultra shreds when it comes to LR import/export - I am just stunned to see how dramatic the difference is. Here's the article that compared LR/PS:

    https://petapixel.com/2023/06/12/apple-m2-ultra-mac-studio-review-it-shreds-through-photo-and-video-edits/
    edited June 2023
  • Reply 4 of 11
    All of this information is right on Apple’s tech pages. This just adds some graphs. 
    How about an explanation as to why the massive weight difference between the two Studios and what the means for the computer / us.
    i get it as to the need to compare performance of various graphic applications, since we have all those GPUs and Neural cores. How about clock maximum clock speed for a single core, for the various types of cores, and a bit on how those speeds are affected by heat Thus why the copper heat synch in the Ultra). Some bench marks on time for compiling would be nice for us that do what most people think as the dreary work of coding. Getting an idea as to how fast my code will compile is a compelling number. 

    Then there is the issue (or not) of SSD performance when only one SSD port is filled as compared to all the 4 SSD ports. One may not need much space on board, but if this will affect performance I may jump for the higher capacity for the speed.

    i look forward to a new review that covers these issues in more depth when you get your hands dirty getting inside them.

    Unlike so many others in these comments, I buy a new macOS computer about every 10 years. I like to have great information. I suspected these are very much the same as the M1s other than the M2. So I have followed the more detailed report from others over the last year. Oh yes, I buy a new PC about once every 10 years. That is due in about 5 more years.

    BTW, have been an avid reader since your print publication came out. Thanks for all the years.
  • Reply 5 of 11
    whodiiniwhodiini Posts: 13member
    This article has a factually incorrect spec.  The M1 Max has 2 front USB C ports, but they are limited to about 8Gbps, not 10Gbps per USB 3.1G2 spec.  Apple uses only 1 PCie lane, not 2 so that sets the limit.  I wonder if the M2 Max also has the same limitation or if apple fixed this in hardware.  The M1 chips also have poor speeds with thunderbolt to external TB3 drives compared to intel machines.  Also interested in whether apple fixed it,  Articles like this that just compare specs without actually testing them are of limited usel
  • Reply 6 of 11
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,787member
    Anyone like me not focused on GeekBench or making YouTube videos about making YouTube videos...  

    OK, I didn't need it, and as I am retired, I use Macs for hobbies now.  That's Photoshop, Lightroom and Capture One, Topaz Video AI, and all the Topaz Photoshop filters, as I am a keen photographer and videographer with a Sony A7 IV.  I have used an M1 Studio Max with a 1TB SSD since they came out.  I now have the M2 Mac Studio Ultra, running as an identical clone of the M1 using Migration Assistant.

    I hate to tell you...  truthfully, I can't tell the difference between them. 
    tenthousandthings
  • Reply 7 of 11
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,388member
    MacPro said:
    Anyone like me not focused on GeekBench or making YouTube videos about making YouTube videos...  

    OK, I didn't need it, and as I am retired, I use Macs for hobbies now.  That's Photoshop, Lightroom and Capture One, Topaz Video AI, and all the Topaz Photoshop filters, as I am a keen photographer and videographer with a Sony A7 IV.  I have used an M1 Studio Max with a 1TB SSD since they came out.  I now have the M2 Mac Studio Ultra, running as an identical clone of the M1 using Migration Assistant.

    I hate to tell you...  truthfully, I can't tell the difference between them. 
    Thanks. That's a very helpful post.

    I've been looking at the Studios for a few months and will likely buy soon. I had been leaning towards the M1 Studio Max, and your personal experience makes choosing the earlier gen a firmer one.  Finding value-priced machines is not uncommon with the M2's now out. 
  • Reply 8 of 11
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,787member
    gatorguy said:
    MacPro said:
    Anyone like me not focused on GeekBench or making YouTube videos about making YouTube videos...  

    OK, I didn't need it, and as I am retired, I use Macs for hobbies now.  That's Photoshop, Lightroom and Capture One, Topaz Video AI, and all the Topaz Photoshop filters, as I am a keen photographer and videographer with a Sony A7 IV.  I have used an M1 Studio Max with a 1TB SSD since they came out.  I now have the M2 Mac Studio Ultra, running as an identical clone of the M1 using Migration Assistant.

    I hate to tell you...  truthfully, I can't tell the difference between them. 
    Thanks. That's a very helpful post.

    I've been looking at the Studios for a few months and will likely buy soon. I had been leaning towards the M1 Studio Max, and your personal experience makes choosing the earlier gen a firmer one.  Finding value-priced machines is not uncommon with the M2's now out. 
    If it were me, I'd get the M2 Studio Max and add the 1TB drive.  I suspect Apple solved several development issues in the M2, not to mention better WiFi and HDMI, should they be needed.  The other unknown is Sonoma, and VisionOS might be better with M2.  That said, I am running Sonoma on M1, and it's OK so far.
    edited July 2023
  • Reply 9 of 11
    rezwitsrezwits Posts: 891member
    M2 Max is a pretty hard core "steal."  You are saving $2K, and getting 80% performance of the $4K price of the M1 Max.  The M3 Max at $2K could literally be the same speed as the M1 Ultra at $4K!!!

    I mean talk about "Lisa was $10K" stories...

    Laters...
  • Reply 10 of 11
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,787member
    I have to update my earlier response regarding the M2 Ultra.  I have now had a week with it, and it is indeed a hell of a lot faster.  For one thing, I had not optimized Topaz Video AI to use four processors, it was only using one!  This thing is a beast.  I also fixed the poor wifi reception Studios suffer from when in a weak area, I turned it totally upside down.  Now it is almost as good as an iMac.  So now, zero regrets about going for the Ultra.
  • Reply 11 of 11
    robjnrobjn Posts: 283member
    Geekbench still appears to be listing M2 Max scores based on the performance in the MacBook Pro.

    The actual scores in the Studio are a bit higher. In my testing I got 2,829 for single core, 15,080 for multicore and 144,598 for Metal.

    The machine is also absolutely silent. 

    (The Metal score above reflects the 38 core GPU)
Sign In or Register to comment.