Apple Vision Pro execs talk about developer headset accessibility

Posted:
in Apple Vision Pro

The Apple Vision Pro needs to convince developers to create apps for the headset, as well as get consumers to buy into the platform when it is released, with accessibility a big part of Apple's plan to make the device a success.

Apple Vision Pro at Apple Park
Apple Vision Pro at Apple Park



The Apple Vision Pro is months away from its expected release in early 2024, and before then, Apple has a lot of time available to try and make it as much of a success as possible. To do so, it has to encourage two different categories to buy into the Apple Vision Pro.

The first group is developers, who must be convinced to make compelling third-party apps for the headset. The other is the end consumer, a group that the developer's apps could be used for convincing hardware purchases in the future.

In an interview with Digital Trends, Apple VP of developer relations Susan Prescott and senior director of product marketing for Apple Vision Pro Steve Sinclair, as well as a number of developers, discussed the state of the headset, and what needs to happen next.

Onboarding developers



Following reports that developers didn't attend device developer labs in droves, Apple is insistent that developers are excited for the headset. Prescott claims there has been "extremely high, three-digit customer satisfaction for the labs we've run so far."

The WWDC introduction and getting developers some immediate hands-on time shortly after was important, said Sinclair, as "it's those types of experiences that are going to inspire developers to create their own experiences." Sinclair added that the number of SDK downloads has "exceeded our expectations."

The plan to get more developers on board, including loaner headsets, compatibility evaluations, and other online resources, are thought to be part of the developer onboarding plan. "We don't just want to have a lot of apps available for Vision Pro - we want them to work great," said Prescott.

That hands-on time is an important factor for some developers, with Blackbox developer Ryan McLeod advising "It's hard for me to imagine being inspired enough to build Blackbox for Vision Pro without having had ample hands-on time."

This time with the hardware will be "crucially important" for developers, with McLeod hoping "as many developers as possible - especially smaller indie teams - get that opportunity and support for the platform."

Apple will also need to convince other developers to sign up in the future, with Sinclair proposing "We need to make it accessible to every single one of our developers." Access to developer tools like Xcode and SwiftUI will help make sure the platform is comprehensible to existing developers, and those who are just starting their developer journey.

Access to hardware beyond loaners will also be tricky, beyond developer kits. In one proposal, XRHealth's Eran Orr, Miki Levy, and Xavi Oromi proposes that Apple could make it more accessible by offering a grant to developers who cannot afford either a headset or Mac, since it "would help not only the developer community, but also empower the world to create more potentially life-changing applications."

Public facing



The public is a harder group to convince, having previously needed to deal with the plethora of existing headsets on the market, as well as swallowing Apple's $3,499 price tag.

"One of the things that we've observed is that when people first put on Vision Pro, they're so blown away by the new spatial experiences that they see that they oftentimes forget that they're actually wearing something," said Sinclair. Urging developers to create new experiences is par for the course, as Sinclair believes immersive apps "are the things that customers and users are going to be excited about."

To do so, Sinclair doesn't think its a case of convincing based on form factor, but of showing off these experiences, and proving that the Vision Pro can deliver.

Part of this need to convince the public explains the lack of controllers. "We came to the most simple conclusion, which is: [people] should use something they already know how to use. It's their eyes, it's their hands, it's their voice," said Apple's reps.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 3
    x38x38 Posts: 97member
    I’m very intrigued by Vision Pro, but it’s also very pricey. I could see ordering one the moment they go on sale, but I can’t see ordering one without the opportunity to try it out for myself first.
    Is there any word on whether there will be demo units available for the public to try out before they go on sale, and if so, when?
    Maybe I’ve just missed it, but that seems to me like the most critical unanswered question so far. At least it is for my purchase decision.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 3
    Pretty sure you’ll be able to try it out at the Apple Store, that’s why it’s there. I don’t however think Apple is worried about selling that many to typical consumers. This first Gen is mostly for developers, and sure, a few “money is no object” enthusiasts. The 2nd gen will target broader consumers, once apps are in place, and see a healthy price cut — that will be very compelling. Won’t be much different from the trajectory of the iPhone (remember Jobs saying “we’ll be happy to sell 1 million in the first year” when it was introduced … LoL). The watch also rapidly dropped in price after the first generations. 

    People talk about how the high price will lead to some epic fail, but just need to trust the process.
    edited September 2023 FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 3
    thttht Posts: 5,452member
    Pretty sure you’ll be able to try it out at the Apple Store, that’s why it’s there. I don’t however think Apple is worried about selling that many to typical consumers. This first Gen is mostly for developers, and sure, a few “money is no object” enthusiasts. The 2nd gen will target broader consumers, once apps are in place, and see a healthy price cut — that will be very compelling. Won’t be much different from the trajectory of the iPhone (remember Jobs saying “we’ll be happy to sell 1 million in the first year” when it was introduced … LoL). The watch also rapidly dropped in price after the first generations. 

    People talk about how the high price will lead to some epic fail, but just need to trust the process.
    The first gen is for early adopters and enthusiasts, not developers. Hardware for developers are typically special locked down "developer" kits. Eg, the Apple Silicon Developer kits was an A12Z board in a Mac Mini, the Intel developer kit was a plain Xeon or Pentium D board in a Power Mac G5 box. Then, Apple likely has special development kits which are basically seal black boxes. The Vision Pro developer kits are likely pre-production hardware, with a lot of hardware features not even working. 

    When the Vision Pro goes on sale, early adopters and enthusiasts will constitute 90% of sales. Of that, perhaps a good fraction will go towards specialty applications in medical, manufacturing, design, etc. You can perhaps calls these buyers "developers", but they aren't producing software for consumer sales. Enthusiasts might be a good fraction of the 90%. Developers might be the remaining 10%.

    Developers need a market to sell into. The 1st gen Vision Pro units have to go to end consumers so that developers have customers to buy their software. So, the obvious trick is that Apple has to have a product that is stand alone and useful for customers to buy, and thus generating a market for developers to sell into, and from there, the hope is a killer app arises.

    The essential pitch for the Vision Pro is that it is a computer. People doing computing things with it in a 3D spatial view. There's media and entertainment features, but the VP will be made or broken on how productive people are with it.
    FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.