Samsung T9 SSD review: Next-generation portable storage

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware

Samsung's latest addition to its portable SSD lineup is the T9 which has plenty of drop protection and newfound speed improvements -- at least for some users.

The new Samsung T9 portable SSD
The new Samsung T9 portable SSD



The Samsung T9 portable SSD has launched with a black rubber exterior and a compact size to go anywhere. It is faster, in some situations than the T7 SSD it succeeds, and boasts three meters of drop protection and IP65 resistance.

Samsung T9 SSD review: Best of both worlds



The predecessor to the T9, Samsung's T7, came in several different flavors.

Samsung T5 SSD (top), T7 (middle), and T9 (bottom)
Samsung T5 SSD (top), T7 (middle), and T9 (bottom)



You could opt for the T7 Touch which was a fingerprint-protected model that helped secure your data with biometrics. Perhaps you valued durability most and could pick up the T7 Shield with its rubberized outer coating.

If neither of those were for you, there of course was the vanilla T7 that had a sleek anodized metal body at the most affordable price.

Samsung T7 Shield (left) versus T9 (right)
Samsung T7 Shield (left) versus T9 (right)



When releasing the T9, Samsung decided to omit the other styles and debut the base T9 with a similar rugged exterior to the T7 Shield. There is no bare aluminum version nor a fingerprint-protected version.

Heck, Samsung isn't even bringing the T9 to market with any colors. The black we tested is the only color option here at launch.

Holding the Samsung T9
Holding the Samsung T9



That's a little troublesome with the black color, it makes its dust attraction even more apparent. While the T7 Shield had a smooth rubber exterior, the T9 is textured.

The texture does add even more grip but causes dust to stick to it like crazy. Shooting the embedded video took twice as long just trying to keep all of the little pieces of dust off the drive.

If there were color options, the dust probably wouldn't be as noticeable, such as with a red or blue.

Samsung T9 USB-C port
Samsung T9 USB-C port



Otherwise, one end of the SSD has a USB-C port, which has been upgraded here for the T9, and a mini LED status light. The other end is solid and matte black with some regulatory printing.

Samsung USB-C to USB-A cable
Samsung USB-C to USB-A cable



In the box, Samsung includes both a USB-C to USB-C and a USB-C to USB-A cable.

Samsung T9 SSD review: Testing those new speeds



With its USB-C port, the Samsung T9 SSD works with devices across the board. Connect it with your Mac, PC, Android phone, iPad, or even the new iPhone 15.

It comes pre-formatted as an ExFAT drive though you can reformat it to any other if you so choose. Oftentimes, we'll reformat ours as APFS, especially if using it as a Time Machine backup.

Samsung T9 SSD connected to iPad mini
Samsung T9 SSD connected to iPad mini



For testing, we left it stock with the ExFAT formatting and did not apply any password or encryption on the data. All testing was done on our M2 Max 16-inch MacBook Pro.

Samsung says the new drive uses USB 3.2 2x2 with promised speeds of up to 2000 MBps. We tried several different file transfers and tried them both on the T9, and the older T7.

We started with a 1.44GB file -- the latest episode of the HomeKit Insider podcast -- and it took two and a half seconds to complete on both drives.

Then we stepped things up, moving to a 6.78GB movie file. This time it took 7.86 seconds on the T9 and the T7 was nearly identical.

Transferring a large file to the Samsung T9 SSD
Transferring a large file to the Samsung T9 SSD



To finish things off, we moved to a much larger 162GB compressed folder. This one took seven minutes and 28 seconds on the T7 but the T9 took only two minutes and 55 seconds.

It begs the question as to why the T7 was just as fast starting but became much slower when we got to the larger file.

While this is complicated, the Mac doesn't fully support the 20 gigabits per second throughput on USB 3.2 2x2, so the speed in the T9 on Mac is largely coming from the larger cache.

When you get above a roughly 225GB transfer size, though, the T9 will start to slow down as the cache fills, and it hits the slower TLC flash media.

The T9 has about a 170GB cache while the older T7 has a 50GB cache. Any files under that 225GB or so will transfer at the best speed possible which varies depending on lots of small files, or one large file, on the T9.

In use, the T7 has the same speed as the T9 on the Mac until its 50 GB cache is full.

Samsung T9 SSD connected to a MacBook Pro
Samsung T9 SSD connected to a MacBook Pro



For you to understand, imagine a one-gallon tank is filling and draining water at the same time. But it is filling faster than it is draining.

Once the tank is full it can only fill at the same rate as it is draining at. That's roughly how it works with a file transfer.

At first, the data can fly, but once the tank fills -- or the cache is filled -- it has to slow down. In the case of the T9, it has to drop down to the slower TLC media.

Samsung T9 SSD connected to a MacBook Pro
Samsung T9 SSD connected to a MacBook Pro



If you solely transfer small files, less than 50GB or so, there won't be any speed benefits on the T9. You may as well get the more affordable T7.

For users who are regularly transferring larger files above 50GB, the T9 will see speed benefits. But it, too, will be limited for even larger files.

Samsung T9 against the MacBook display
Samsung T9 against the MacBook display



When or if Apple fully supports USB 3.2 2x2, there will be larger benefits to the T9.

Samsung T9 SSD review: Should you buy the newest SSD?



Historically, we've been happy users of Samsung's T-series of portable SSDs for years and are excited about the new T9. With our video production, we're often moving larger files that surpass the 50GB cache of the T7.

We may not see the full speed that the T9 can offer, but it was undeniably faster than our T7 and many other SSDs in our kit.

Samsung T9 connected to iPhone 15 Pro Max
Samsung T9 connected to iPhone 15 Pro Max



It would be great to see new color options or even an all-metal version for those who don't need or want the rubber exterior. If all metal, we'd have considered sticking it to the back of our iPhone 15 Pro with MagSafe and using it for portable filming.

As always, the Samsung T9 SSD is fast, reliable, and is a solid addition to any gear bag. It comes with two cables in the box and backed up by a five-year warranty in 1TB, 2TB, and 4TB configurations.

Samsung T9 SSD box
Samsung T9 SSD box

Samsung T9 SSD review: Pros

  • Compact, rugged design

  • Speed improvements, with an asterisk

  • Affordable

Samsung T9 SSD review: Cons

  • Collects dust

  • Mac still doesn't fully support USB 3.2 2x2

  • No color or style options at launch

Rating: 4 out of 5



This would be a 5 out of 5 if Apple supported USB 3.2 2x2 to the fullest and Mac users could get even more performance out of this drive. For now, the T7 Shield is an adequate alternative to save some money if you have smaller file sizes.

Where to buy the Samsung T9 SSD



The Samsung T9 SSD is available from Amazon starting from $129.99.

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    Andrew, what do you mean by "not fully support?" Or, to ask the question another way, to what extent DOES Apple support USB 3.2 2x2? Also: I believe that all Macs now have USB 4 ports, or at least they're labeled as such. Doesn't USB 4 fully support USB 3.2 2x2? Or does Apple have its own flavor of USB 4? Apple really contributes to the confusion here by not clearing stating their support, or lack thereof, for USB 3.2 2x2. Thanks for this excellent report on the T9 and clarifying what Mac owners should and should not expect from it in terms of performance. For Mac owners, what we see promoted about the T9 is not exactly what we get. 
    edited November 2023 watto_cobraFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 2 of 13
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,200member
    Check out the Orico m.2 40 Gbps Thunderbolt enclosure. With a Samsung 990 Pro SSD, I see 2850 MB/second in Blackmagic for both read and write on M1 MBP. It also supports high speed USB.
    dewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 13
    maltzmaltz Posts: 454member
    • Mac still doesn't fully support USB 3.2 2x2

    How is that a Con of the drive, and not just Macs?  In any case, I'd appreciate more technical detail about that situation, like was included about the cache functionality.
  • Reply 4 of 13
    I’m curious about the cache. It sounds large, 170GB, but is it volatile? i.e. I copy my 150GB latest movie creation, rag out the USB and some time later, wonder where my data went?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 13
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,326moderator
    I’m curious about the cache. It sounds large, 170GB, but is it volatile? i.e. I copy my 150GB latest movie creation, rag out the USB and some time later, wonder where my data went?
    It's an SLC cache so data is safer in the cache than the rest of the SSD.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/21079/samsung-t9-portable-ssd-review-a-20-gbps-pssd-for-prosumer-workloads/3
    watto_cobraFileMakerFellerappleinsideruser
  • Reply 6 of 13
    jdwjdw Posts: 1,340member
    You really need to reformat the T9 as APFS and retest.  That's because I've been watching a lot of videos of late on Thunderbolt 4 SSDs to see which is the most consistently fast, and many reviewers are getting speeds much slower than rated speeds only because they used ExFAT so as to test on both a Mac and Windows.  Those who reformatted APFS and retested get closer to the expected speeds.  So I strongly suggest you retest the T9 using the APFS format on your Mac.
    watto_cobraFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 7 of 13
    lewklewk Posts: 25member
    Not only is there the issue of using ExFAT but you tested on an M2 Max.  What difference would there be with an M3 Max and the drive formatted as APFS.  And as noted, the M2 and M3 systems support Thunderbolt 4 which, according to Wikipedia, supports USB4 and is suppose to be 4 times faster than USB 3.2 Gen 2.1.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 13
    576 MB/S
    862,595 MB/S
    925,714 MB/S

    —the calculated transfer rates, for your convenience…

    I better abstain from commenting further on the content in this article.
    jellyapple
  • Reply 9 of 13
    lewklewk Posts: 25member
    Another question - where did you find the cache sizes?  I've looked on both Samsung's site and Amazon and I couldn't find anything about the cache sizes.  170GB is a LOT of cache!  Even 50GB is a lot of cache!
  • Reply 10 of 13
    Marvin said:
    I’m curious about the cache. It sounds large, 170GB, but is it volatile? i.e. I copy my 150GB latest movie creation, rag out the USB and some time later, wonder where my data went?
    It's an SLC cache so data is safer in the cache than the rest of the SSD.

    https://www.anandtech.com/show/21079/samsung-t9-portable-ssd-review-a-20-gbps-pssd-for-prosumer-workloads/3
    Thanks. Neat summary for those (like me) new to combining SLC with MLC: https://www.technipages.com/what-is-slc-caching/
  • Reply 11 of 13
    Worrying.
    Why? Let’s look at T7 performance from my personal experience. The speed of 4TB Write speed is less than 100MB/s in 3 out 4 pieces I tested.  For T7 2TB, the Write speed drops to 80B/s after normal use as external macOS Startup drive after a year. 
    A spec and a test on brand new piece of T9 don’t guarantee anything over a three years live expectancy of such SSD.
    appleinsideruser
  • Reply 12 of 13
    I've just received my T9 and am a little disappointed.

    When I first tested out of the box (on MBP M1 Max), I got about 1600Mb/s, which is good but not 2000.

    However, that was still formatted as ExFAT. I reformatted to APFS and got 950Mb/s instead. Hmmm....

    I went back to ExFat and then tried to move my Apple Photos library to it, but it told me I couldn't then sync to iCloud from here as it wasn't APFS or HFS. So had to go back to APFS and again seeing 950.

    Maybe I should've saved some money and just bought a T7.
    netrox
  • Reply 13 of 13
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,213member
    I've just received my T9 and am a little disappointed.

    When I first tested out of the box (on MBP M1 Max), I got about 1600Mb/s, which is good but not 2000.

    However, that was still formatted as ExFAT. I reformatted to APFS and got 950Mb/s instead. Hmmm....

    I went back to ExFat and then tried to move my Apple Photos library to it, but it told me I couldn't then sync to iCloud from here as it wasn't APFS or HFS. So had to go back to APFS and again seeing 950.

    Maybe I should've saved some money and just bought a T7.
    The T7 Touch 2TB is exactly what I just purchased.  I won't benefit from the supposed faster transfer speeds on the T9 anyway, plus the T7 Touch is on sale direct from Samsung for $100 and free shipping.  
    edited November 2023
Sign In or Register to comment.