M3 MacBook Air review: The ideal Mac laptop for Intel hold-outs
Apple's latest update to the MacBook Air brings M3 to the consumer-oriented lineup. Sure, it's a spec-bump, but it's one that should be tremendously attractive to Intel Mac users.
Apple MacBook Air M3 - review
With the shift over from Intel-based chips to Apple Silicon in late 2020, there was a massive internal overhaul to the MacBook Air, while it still externally resembled the classic wedge design. Two years later, the introduction of the M2 was the catalyst for change, with Apple changing MacBook Air design for the first time in ages.
Modernized and more in line with the MacBook Pro aesthetic, that redesign was a major departure for the MacBook Air. Instead of that wedge, the MacBook Air had a 2015 MacBook-like design, squared off and flat, for the first time.
There's no design evolution this time around, and we're not expecting the MacBook Air chassis to change for about five more years or so. That's fine, of course -- not every year needs to contain a massive paradigm shift in architecture, design, or how things are done.
The M3 MacBook Air is a spec-bump, and a mild refresh for Apple's hardware, with a few core chips and specifications changed. It's an upgrade that happens to practically all of Apple's main device lineups at some stage, and it has now arrived on the 13-inch and 15-inch MacBook Air.
Because of all this, it's going to be a boring and uninspiring update for some, but that's to be expected. For those still on Intel Mac models, it could be just what they're looking for.
M3 MacBook Air review - Specs
| Specifications | M3 MacBook Air (2024) |
|---|---|
| Launch Starting Price | $1,099 (13-inch), $1,299 (15-inch) Best M3 MacBook Air 13-inch prices Best M3 MacBook Air 15-inch prices |
| Dimensions (inches) | 11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 (13-inch), 13.40 x 9.35 x 0.45 (15-inch) |
| Weight (pounds) | 2.7 (13-inch), 3.3 (15-inch) |
| Display | 13.6-inch Liquid Retina, 15.3-inch Liqud Retina Wide Color (P3), True Tone |
| Resolution | 2,560 x 1,664 (13-inch), 2,880 x 1,864 (15-inch) |
| Brightness | 500 nits |
| Processor | Apple M3 8-core |
| Graphics | 8-core GPU (13-inch only) 10-core GPU |
| Memory | 8GB, 16GB, 24GB |
| Storage | 256GB, 512GB, 1TB, 2TB |
| Battery | 52.6Wh lithium-polymer, (13-inch), 66.5Wh lithium-polymer (15-inch) |
| Networking | 802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Touch ID | Yes |
| Camera | 1080p FaceTime HD |
| Audio | Four-speaker sound system (13-inch), Six-speaker sound system (15-inch), Three-mic array with directional beamforming, Voice Isolation and Wide Spectrum mic modes, Headphone jack with high-impedance headphone support, Dolby Atmos support with Spatial Audio |
| Ports | Two Thunderbolt/USB 4 ports 3.5mm headphone, MagSafe 3 |
M3 MacBook Air review - Design
For the third generation of the MacBook Air's redesign, the same aluminum flat slab and industrial aesthetic enclosure has been retained, which fits perfectly alongside the MacBook Pro.
This lack of change also applies to its base dimensions. The 2024 13-inch MacBook Air retains the same exact footprint at 11.97 inches by 8.46 inches.
M3 MacBook Air review -- Apple's MacBook Air comes in two sizes
The 15-inch is similarly static, at 13.4 inches by 9.35 inches. In terms of thickness, that too is the same as last time, at 0.44 inches for the 13-inch, 0.45 inches for the 15-inch model. They're also the same weight at 2.7 pounds and 3.3 pounds respectively.
Apple's use of the same enclosure makes sense, and it's not a disappointment despite what breathless YouTube takes may claim. The M2 MacBook Air was a fantastic design in its own right, and Apple didn't feel the need to make any changes to it.
M3 MacBook Air review - Display and Audio
Since the enclosure is the same, it makes sense that the display is also unchanged from M2. The 13.6-inch Liquid Retina Display once again makes an appearance, with its resolution of 2,560 by 1,664 and a pixel density of 224 pixels per inch being more than adequate for most users.
The 15-inch model has a larger 15.3-inch Liquid Retina Display, and a larger 2,880 by 1,864 resolution and 224 ppi pixel density that match the earlier 15-inch M2 release specs.
M3 MacBook Air review -- Apple kept the same display from last year
At the top is the ever-complained-about notch for the FaceTime HD camera. In practical use, while it cuts into the display area, it does so only in the middle of the menu bar, and it's also hidden when in full-screen mode.
The notch is here to stay. Apple's solution is elegant enough, and wasn't a big deal when it popped out in the Apple Silicon MacBook Pro. It's still not a big deal now.
That FaceTime HD camera is a reuse of the 1080p upgrade from the 2022 redesign, and still not an iPhone-style True Depth array that could occupy the space. Apple's use of computational video and the M3's onboard advanced image signal processor makes the image as good as possible.
M3 MacBook Air review -- Apple's MacBook Air has 500 nits of brightness
The backlighting is still LED instead of the miniLED enjoyed by the MacBook Pro line, but it manages the typical 500 nits of brightness. It also retains support for 1 billion colors, Wide Color (P3), and True Tone.
On the audio side, there's no real change from the M2's great four-speaker sound system for the 13-inch model. It also supports Wide Stereo Sound and Spatial Audio for Dolby Atmos content.
The 15-inch MacBook Air also uses the same six-speaker system as the previous version, complete with force-cancelling woofers, Spatial Audio support, and Wide Stereo Sound.
The three-mic array with directional beamforming also returns, but with a minor tweak. The Voice Isolation and Wide Spectrum modes Apple included in the iPhone 15 Pro line has been imported here, to help improve video calls.
On the right-hand side is a 3.5 headphone jack, which retains its support for high-impedance headphones.
M3 MacBook Air review - Ports, power, and periphery
There's nothing new in terms of wired connectivity. On the left-hand side of the MacBook Air is a pair of Thunderbolt/USB 4 ports for connecting peripherals, docks, and drives. Two ports still feels a bit scant, but for the target market, it's probably fine.
M3 MacBook Air review: There's two Thunderbolt ports and a MagSafe 3 port on the left side of the MacBook Air
You can recharge the MacBook Air using one of those ports, but you're probably better off doing so with the MagSafe 3 connection right next to them. This does free up the ports from being occupied with the task of charging, which is useful.
For wireless connectivity, the use of Bluetooth 5.3 is expected. Apple did improve the networking to Wi-Fi 6E instead of Wi-Fi 6. This is good future-proofing, as the standard becomes more commonplace.
The battery is unchanged and is still a 52.6-watt-hour lithium-polymer version for the 13-inch, 66.5Wh for the 15-inch. Apple says that this lasts for up to 15 hours of wireless web access, and up to 18 hours of Apple TV app movie playback.
M3 MacBook Air review -- There's a headphone jack on the right side of the MacBook Air
As it did last year, our testing bore this out. Obviously, the harder you hammer the processor and the brighter you keep your monitor, the shorter life you'll get.
The charger you get with the MacBook Air depends on the chip you select for it. If you go with the M3 13-inch with the 8-core GPU, you get the 30W USB-C Power Adapter, while the 10-core GPU and 512GB of storage upgrades you to the 35W Dual USB-C Port Compact Power Adapter. You do get the dual adapter by default for all 15-inch configurations.
M3 MacBook Air review -- The MacBook Air supports Touch ID
Apple's Magic Keyboard retains all of the features it had last time, such as the full-height function row and the inverted-T arrow keys. Backlighting and an ambient light sensor are standard for Apple's notebooks, with Touch ID returning once again for authentication.
M3 MacBook Air review - M3 and performance
The real meat of the update this time is on the processing side of things. In the new MacBook Air, two varieties of M3 chip are available, with both having an 8-core CPU. There's the usual four-performance-core, four-efficiency-core split at play, except Apple says there's more performance.
Memory bandwidth remains at 100GB/s, along with a 16-core Neural Engine, and the Media Engine. The Media Engine is upgraded this time to include a dedicated AV1 decode engine alongside the other encode and decode engines.
Unified memory options are the same as last time, with an 8GB starter allocation and options for 16GB or 24GB available.
Customers also have the choice of an 8-core or 10-core Apple-designed GPU, though that choice is only for the 13-inch as the 15-inch has the 10-core GPU by default. Along with expectations of improved performance, the GPU also gains hardware-accelerated ray tracing, an addition that can benefit gaming and graphical applications.
The graphical changes also include one for multi-monitor users, in that it is possible to use two external displays with the M3 MacBook Air when the unit is in clamshell mode. Previously, the two-display limit always included the built-in screen as one of them, so this change will help for some desk setups.
Since you can't access the keyboard, trackpad, nor Touch ID sensor when the Mac is in Clamshell Mode, you obviously need external accessories.
M3 MacBook Air review - Geekbench single-core and multi-core tests
When it comes to performance, the M3 in the MacBook Air is continuing to improve on the M2, with its Geekbench single-core result of 3,256 being better than the M2 and considerably higher than the M1 MacBook Air.
On the multi-core side, the 12,102 result for the M3 is a solid 35% better than the M2, and 68% better than the M1. This is considerable progress for Apple Silicon in just a few years.
M3 MacBook Air review - Geekbench Metal tests
It's a similar story on the graphical side, as we still see continued improvement in Geekbench's Metal results. The jump from M1's 33,277 result to 45,836 in M2 is largely down to a switch from 8 GPU cores to 10 cores being tested.
The M3 being tested again has 10 GPU cores, and shifts the score even higher to 47,985. This is barely touching a 5% increase over M2 in our test result, but it's about 45% better than the upper-tier M1 chip.
We suspect that Apple's claimed up-to-60% increase would be reached when the M3 is pitted against the lower-core M1.
M3 MacBook Air review - Cinebench 23 single-core and multi-core tests
When throwing Cinebench against the M3, we do again see a decent improvement. The 1,896 for the single-core test is about 20% better than the M2, with the 9,609 multi-core test being 15% better.
M3 MacBook Air review - Speedometer 3.0 tests
Speedometer 3.0 was released on Monday March 11, with a scale shift making previous benchmarks incompatible with the new version. AppleInsider reran the browser benchmark on the M3 and M2 MacBook Air to get results under the new version.
The new scoring system has the M3 at 37 runs per minute, versus 25.1 for the M2 MacBook Air. That is a 47% change in performance.
M3 MacBook Air review - Affinity Photo tests
Putting it through the Affinity Photo benchmark, scores of 974 for the combined multi-CPU tests and 14,049 for the combined single GPU tests are positive changes of 27% and 35% respectively.
In the last Apple Silicon MacBook Air release, Apple used two 256GB memory chips in its 512GB models, but instead of using two 128GB chips in the 256GB version, it chose to use one 256GB chip. The decision meant that users of the entry-level model faced reduced storage read and write speeds just for that variant. For most users, that didn't matter.
Regardless, it's been "fixed" for the M3. Testing of the M3 256GB model shows that the speeds are much faster, comparable to the 512GB and up.
M3 MacBook Air review - Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
In testing the M3 and M2 MacBook Air using the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, the M3 MacBook Air achieved a read speed of 2,740MB/s and a write speed of 1,917MB/s. These are both much higher than the M2 256GB capacity, at 1,158MB/s for reads and 1,600 MB/s for writes.
Let's talk about heat, again
By the time you read this, the wailing and gnashing of teeth about "thermal throttling" by a segment of the Apple review base has already begun. We've already seen some, and they're as pointless as they always are.
M3 MacBook Air review -- Midnight color of the new MacBook Air
Barring some kind of fan curve problem, which this machine also does not appear to have, this has been and always shall be an issue generated by folks who believe in clicks and views over anything else. And, they will generate that traffic by sacrificing accuracy, context, and the actual, real-world hardware and usage.
As has been the case for 20 years or more, a chip will get hot and slow down temporarily until it cools. This is by design, and intentional. The lack of a fan in a MacBook Air is also am intentional engineering choice, and a differentiator between the Air and Pro lines.
You already know how I feel about the breathless coverage that the fanless MacBook Air always spawns, which lacks context or an awareness of where the MacBook Air sits in the product lineup. I've been speaking about it for years, and it seems I need to do it again in 2024.
It's been a long time since iPhone purchases were driven by Mac sales -- it's been the other way around for a very long time. More often, MacBook Air sales are driven by folks who want another product, happy with what the iPhone brings.
M3 MacBook Air review -- You can now use two monitors with the MacBook Air
If you're not looking at the MacBook Air as a portable computing appliance, or if your time is that valuable that you're considering storage or RAM upgrades, get a MacBook Pro. With any real upgrades to the 13-inch MacBook Air to drive it into prosumer territory, you're going to hit that 14-inch MacBook Pro territory pretty quick -- but there's a larger gap this year than in most.
And, you probably already know going into this review if you need that power or if you don't. We can't imagine that this computer will be paired with a $10,000 8K HDR camera, or a Pro Display XDR.
M3 MacBook Air review - Pricing
The 13-inch MacBook Air with the 8-core GPU, 8GB of memory, and 256GB of storage, that we reviewed here is priced at $1,099. Bumping the 13-inch model's chip up from an 8-core GPU to a 10-core version sets you back another $100. The 15-inch MacBook Air with the 8-core CPU and 10-core GPU starts at $1,299 with 8GB of memory and 256GB of storage.
Storage starts at 256GB, with 512GB costing $200 more, 1TB being $400 more expensive, and 2TB drawing a $800 premium. The memory's 8GB starting capacity can be similarly upgraded to 16GB for $200 more, or $400 for 24GB.
So, if you're looking at 512GB of storage, and 16GB of RAM, you're looking at $1499 for the 13-inch 8-core CPU 10-core GPU model. This is in comparison to the M3 14-inch MacBook Pro with a better screen, 8GB of RAM and 512GB of storage for $1599, and the M3 Pro model with 11-core CPU, 14-core GPU, 18GB of RAM and 512GB of storage for $1999.
M3 MacBook Air review - Best for Intel switchers
Let's be clear -- the MacBook Air in either 13-inch or 15-inch sizes are the portable Macs we recommend to nearly everybody. In 2024, we got what we thought we would from the MacBook Air of either size, with a spec-bump delivering incremental performance improvements to a pair of already incredibly solid machines.
The M3 MacBook Air started from a great place with the M2 MacBook Air. The company didn't really need to change the design, especially so soon after the last overhaul.
The performance improvements are impressive enough, but the M3 MacBook Air hard to recommend to any existing Apple Silicon MacBook Air user. But -- any Intel-based MacBook Air user should really consider jumping aboard.
And, Apple is clear about that point. Apple's marketing for the M3 MacBook Air specifically calls out the 2017 Intel MacBook Air. The M3 version has up to 13 times faster performance than the Intel model, as well as up to six hours more battery life, a better display, and a higher-resolution camera.
And, that's at the entry-level.
Intel was good while it lasted, and was fantastic in the early days of Intel Macs, while Intel kept promises that it made to Apple. This deteriorated over time. In the latter years of the partnership, Intel promised X level of performance with Y TDP. It didn't quite meet X, while exceeding Y by a notable percentage -- which is part of the reason Apple bailed on Intel.
Those days are gone with Apple Silicon. If you have a new-ish Intel Mac, you can already see the official support line creeping up behind you.
Intel Mac folks -- it's time. It's been over three years since the Apple Silicon debut, and there's an entire range of new and old Apple Silicon to get on board with. Unless you've got the last Intel Mac Pro, the MacBook Air will be at least as fast as what you own, and in all likelihood, notably speedier in every regard.
And, the great thing about new hardware, is that it drives down older hardware pricing if you don't need something so speedy.
M3 MacBook Air review - Pros
- M3 upgrade
- Clamshell mode
- Fixes storage speed issue
M3 MacBook Air review - Cons
- Looks just like the last model
- Storage upgrades continue to be expensive
Rating: 4.5 out of 5
Where to buy Apple's M3 MacBook Air with the best deals
AppleInsider readers can grab exclusive savings on Apple's M3 MacBook Air, with the latest deals in our M3 MacBook Air 15-inch Price Guide and M3 MacBook Air 13-inch Price Guide.
With promo code APINSIDER, readers can save $100 to $150 on every configuration at Adorama, an Apple Authorized Reseller that's been in business since 1974.
You can also check out the best MacBook Air deals on both current and closeout models, with prices falling to as low as $749.99 at press time.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
As someone who routinely sells my used Mac equipment privately when it's time for an upgrade, a further word of advice to those with Intel MBAs: better to sell now, while it's still supported and can run the latest MacOS. Makes a difference to potential buyers that it's still "current." The resale price will take a big hit once your MBA gets EOL'd by Apple and is stuck on an old OS.
if someone is holding out its because they have a specific program that runs natively on the Intel Mac that for someone reason has issues running on a M-Series Mac, or they just don't have the funding to buy an M-Series Mac. Or, even they're going by the if it ain't broken don't fix it mentality and will just upgrade whenever the Intel Mac stops working for them.
I'm sure there are other reasons to upgrade, but I know a lot of Mac users who had no clue which programs would break when they updated their OS or purchased a newer AS Mac. I therefore took issue with the implication that there's no possible downside to upgrading from an Intel Mac. Buyers need to do their research to make sure their shiny new Mac will meet their needs and to prepare to adjust for anything that won't work after the upgrade.
No, it doesn't have Wifi 7 like PC laptops, but this isn't built for connecting to future routers at any cost. The support for 6E will fix network congestion problems when used with either 7 or 6E routers. Compared to M2 it seems Apple fixed the performance problem with 256 GB models. I still recommend getting the 16 GB version to reduce memory swapping. Is M3 better than M2? Well... resale value + much faster 256 GB version + could be 2 years more of OS support + fewer fingerprints on the black version + 3nm should improve battery life... it might be. The M2 is however one very nice computer as well.
https://www.playonmac.com/wine/
Crossover runs on Apple Silicon and supports hundreds of games, should be the same or more than PlayOnMac, they integrated Apple's DX12 toolkit to support modern games:
https://www.youtube.com/@macprotips/videos
https://www.codeweavers.com/crossover
and there's an alternative launcher here:
https://heroicgameslauncher.com/
Don't for a minute think that the vintage leaning 3.5 mm audio jack on a Mac is just along for the ride. Unless you've done all of your homework as an audiophile, removed all monetary restraints from your budget, and able to detect audio subtleties and nuances that only "true audiophiles" can mysteriously detect, there's a pretty good chance that Apple's built-in audio subsystem is going to be on-par or better than a lot of external add-on DACs, at least those DACs in the lower to moderate price range, i.e., $100-$300 dollar range, maybe higher.
The audio upgrade on Apple Silicon Macs is very significant and is yet another thing that older Intel Mac users are missing out on. If you needed (for whatever reason) an external DAC with your old Intel Mac, there's a very good chance that you won't need it at all with an Apple Silicon Mac.
I learned about this firsthand. I brought my external (USB) DAC I used on my older Mac over to my Mac Studio so I could use higher impedance headphones. Everything worked great and sounded great. But recently, and after one of Apple's many updates, the Mac Studio no longer worked well with the DAC. Noisy and staticky as hell. I initially thought the DAC was fubar, but I saw other users online reported the same issue. I also confirmed my DAC still worked great on my old Intel iMac. I started Amazoning for a replacement, thinking a newer DAC with different components might be in order. Before I pulled the trigger I tried plugging my high impedance headphones into the lonely little 3.5 mm socket hiding in the rear of my Mac Studio. Wowser, not only did it sound as good or better than how my external DAC sounded, but the range of volume was at least as good and indiscernibly different than what the external DAC (actually a DAC+Amp) delivered, and without having to fiddle with knobs on the DAC. The Mac's built-in volume control works perfectly. This saved me from buying something that would not have improved my listening experience at all, at least for someone lacking audiophile mystical powers of audio perception.
Finally, I understand those who are reluctant to leave Intel Macs for virtualization reasons. I too have Windows apps and to a lesser extent Linux apps that require me to keep a PC or virtual PC around. VMWare Fusion has served me impeccably well in this regard. The fact that I can now use VMWare Fusion (Player) for FREE saves me the costs I was previously incurring with upgrades tied to every new release of macOS. It's the deal of the century. When Apple Silicon came around all of that changed. I could no longer run Intel images of Windows or Linux on my Apple Silicon Mac. I could however run Windows 11 Pro ARM on my Apple Silicon Mac using the latest (still free for me) version of VMWare Fusion and it works extremely well and is very stable.
But what about my Windows apps that require an Intel processor? While Microsoft provides a runtime environment for x86 apps on Windows ARM, I really need as close to bare metal as I could get. Solution: I bought a mini PC that cost me $250 USD that sits right next to my M2 MacBook Air, with both machines sharing a glorious 4K monitor, Bluetooth keyboard, and Bluetooth mouse. The mini PC is not equipped with the latest and greatest components, and it isn't as well endowed with memory, storage, I/O, and metal chassis parts as my Intel NUC, but it has a fairly recent vintage 7 nm Ryzen 6-core/12 thread CPU, integrated Radeon GPU, HDMI 2.0, DP 1.4, expandable memory and storage, 10 Gbps USB-A and USB-C ports, gigabit networking, Wi-Fi 6, etc., and has about a 3" x 5" footprint. Doesn't make a sound and has been working for months with no hangs, shutdowns, or restarts other than Windows Update. Probably doesn't play the most demanding PC games particularly well, but I don't play games.
The performance of my mini PC sidekick for my Mac setup completely blows away of my Intel dependent virtual machines that I was running on my Intel Macs. I could even install the free VMWare Workstation Player on it if I wanted to have different Windows or Linux images available on the mini PC. Sure, if I want to take it on the road with my M2 MacBook Air I would need a portable display, keyboard, and mouse as well. You can pick up a usable 15" 4K portable monitor for about $225 USD and I already have the required Bluetooth kb/mouse. As a bonus, a portable monitor would also extend my MacBook Air's visuals to two monitors. At the price point I got the mini PC I knew it wasn't getting the latest & greatest specs to use for more processor intensive tasks. But it's reliable, runs very cool, and if you dig around a bit more you'll find newer mini PCs that have very impressive specs but haven't gotten part their teething problems quite yet. There are also a plethora of cheaporoni mini PCs on the market that have low end Celerons and Atom CPUs or newer Intel CPUs that have no performance cores at all. Sounds a bit nasty, but for some folks it may still be a better platform performance-wise than what they're getting from VMs running on their Intel Macs that they're still reluctant to leave behind.
Of course you can always keep your old Intel Mac around as a VM host and backup Mac.
Your mileage and needs may vary, but there are very logical and viable paths to making your move to Apple Silicon sooner and finally getting to enjoy the many benefits that come with such a move. Depending on your needs, a hybrid approach with a mini PC sidekick may actually deliver more utility and better performance than what you are getting with an older Intel Mac laden with VMs.
I think I'm going to hold out until the OLED MBP comes out, which is rumored for 2025. I do fear that the resell price on this MBP will be trash by then though.