Apple Vision Pro is reigniting the whole AR/VR headset market

Posted:
in Apple Vision Pro

New research says that even as the Apple Vision Pro remains too costly for most users, it will grow and its existence is already a boost for all headsets.

Apple Vision Pro on a black table
Apple Vision Pro is raising awareness of the whole headset market



Mark Zuckerberg may argue that his firm's Meta Quest 3 headset is the "better product, period," but if anything makes its sales grow, it is going to be Apple. Launching the Apple Vision Pro has brought attention to the whole headset market, says IDC.

Plus Apple is changing the headset industry because of how successfully it has adopted what used to be a distant third option, the Mixed Reality device. Before the Apple Vision Pro, headsets tended to be either full Virtual Reality, or they overlaid some digital elements to make Augmented Reality.

"Mixed reality (commonly referred to as MR, the ability for users to toggle between augmented and virtual reality) has been the exception and not the norm," says IDC research director Ramon T. Llamas, "but Apple has shone a bright light on MR with the Vision Pro."

"Along with Apple, many companies such as Meta and others have already begun their journey, transitioning from VR to Mixed Reality," said Jitesh Ubrani, research manager, "ultimately laying the groundwork for true AR experiences."

Bar chart showing forecasted worldwide AR/VR headset shipments, with a line graph for growth percentage, from 2024 to 2028 by IDC.
IDC prediction of the AR/VR/MR headset market (Source: IDC)



IDC reports that global shipments for AR and VR headsets dropped 23.5% percent over 2023. However, it expects shipments to grow 44.2% to 9.8 million units by the end of 2024.

The research firm says that growth will be aided by unspecified new headsets launching before the end of the year. IDC expects that by 2028, VR headsets will grow to 24.7 million units, while AR will reach 10.9 million units.

IDC predicts the growth will come as headsets become used for creating content instead of purely consuming it. The firm says that AI will also increasingly be used in the creation of content for headsets.

Separately, Bloomberg has predicted that in the long term, the Apple Vision Pro will become an iPad-sized market for Apple. A second and potentially less costly Apple Vision Pro is not expected until mid-2025 at the earliest.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    miiwtwomiiwtwo Posts: 44member
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,
    edited March 19 williamlondon
  • Reply 2 of 14
    danoxdanox Posts: 2,875member
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,

    Get a Chromebook with a Pixel both have great phone home capabilities no need to be or live on the edge with Apple products. :smile: 
    tmaydarbus69williamlondon
  • Reply 3 of 14
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,245member

    I forgot all about the Vision Pro! It's still a thing?

    Joking aside, let's hope Apple can keep the ship upright. The fiasco with the Sonoma 14.4 release better not be a sign of things to come!
    9secondkox2
  • Reply 4 of 14
    danox said:
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,

    Get a Chromebook with a Pixel both have great phone home capabilities no need to be or live on the edge with Apple products. :smile: 

    “Tim cook reading apple insider immediately decides to release VisionPro2 for $999 in June at WWDC because an apple insider forum poster commented that VP was too expensive for him “ 😎

    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 14
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,
    Still see you're just copy/pasting from your other comments where you've said the same thing. Anything else to say, or is that the talking point you're paid to spam around?
    lordjohnwhorfin9secondkox2watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 14
    miiwtwomiiwtwo Posts: 44member
    danox said:
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,

    Get a Chromebook with a Pixel both have great phone home capabilities no need to be or live on the edge with Apple products. :smile: 
    nuuuh  B)
    williamlondon
  • Reply 7 of 14
    miiwtwomiiwtwo Posts: 44member
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,
    Still see you're just copy/pasting from your other comments where you've said the same thing. Anything else to say, or is that the talking point you're paid to spam around?
    meh, dream on,
    williamlondon
  • Reply 8 of 14
    miiwtwo said:
    miiwtwo said:
    until the device costs bw $1000-2000 (Pro, non Pro, whatever) we cannot talk,
    Still see you're just copy/pasting from your other comments where you've said the same thing. Anything else to say, or is that the talking point you're paid to spam around?
    meh, dream on,
    Cogent, what a contribution you make to these forums.
    9secondkox2tmaywatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 14
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,727member

    I forgot all about the Vision Pro! It's still a thing?

    Joking aside, let's hope Apple can keep the ship upright. The fiasco with the Sonoma 14.4 release better not be a sign of things to come!
    Vision Pro seems a bit of a distraction at the moment. 
    M68000
  • Reply 10 of 14
    nubusnubus Posts: 386member
    Apple could reignite the Segway, and it would still fail again. This is not about the amount of marketing or engineers. It is mainly "do we need this". Some industries do, but will most of us really want to live or work inside anti-social spheres?

    75% of users often consume video while muting audio. We're social, we do 2nd screening, we travel, walk, and move. Walking or working with a fragile and expensive helmet on your head is simply not compatible with everyday life. 
    M68000muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 11 of 14
    1348513485 Posts: 347member
    nubus said:
    Apple could reignite the Segway, and it would still fail again. This is not about the amount of marketing or engineers. It is mainly "do we need this". Some industries do, but will most of us really want to live or work inside anti-social spheres?

    75% of users often consume video while muting audio. We're social, we do 2nd screening, we travel, walk, and move. Walking or working with a fragile and expensive helmet on your head is simply not compatible with everyday life. 
    Where do you even get the idea that nobody will ever remove the headset, as in "live or work inside anti-social spheres"? As for your claim that "75% of users" (speculative) often consume video while muting audio (speculative--source?), I think that's pure hyperbole.  Anecdote: I haven't even seen a AVP in the wild, so your putative claim that people are living, working, walking etc. with AVP mounted on their heads is silly.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 14
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,376member
    No surprises here. Apple has long been the North Star for many of the markets it enters, including personal media players, smartphones, tablets, amazingly lightweight personal computers, smart watches, truly wireless headphones, personal item locators, never before seen performance per watt CPUs/SoCs, and now spatial computing. It doesn't really matter whether Apple enters the market as the only choice or Apple comes in later as a better choice. Once Apple is in the game all of its competitors will realign and remap their expectations, future investments, and product roadmaps based on where Apple is and what Apple is doing in that market. Apple has been the Polaris so many times I'm surprised they haven't named a product or service "Polaris."
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 14
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,420member
    nubus said:
    Apple could reignite the Segway, and it would still fail again. This is not about the amount of marketing or engineers. It is mainly "do we need this". Some industries do, but will most of us really want to live or work inside anti-social spheres?

    75% of users often consume video while muting audio. We're social, we do 2nd screening, we travel, walk, and move. Walking or working with a fragile and expensive helmet on your head is simply not compatible with everyday life. 
    Ridiculous. Do you consider yourself living inside your TV when you watch it? Or living inside your headphones when listening to music? As for work, not everyone has a social job. I work alone, 99% of the time. 

    Calling bullshit on your 75% of users muting video. Also, what does that have to do with anything? What makes you think you can't be social, travel, walk, and move etc AND also have a device like the AVP? And if you were paying any attention at all, the intended use case for the AVP is not walking around with it on in everyday life. 

    AR will eventually move to glasses-like/transparent/portable form factors where they can integrate better into "everyday life". This isn't that, nor is it trying to be. There will still be a market for fully-immersive VR devices at that point as well, which are NOT meant for walking around in doing everyday things. 

    Get real.

    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 14
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,420member

    I forgot all about the Vision Pro! It's still a thing?

    Joking aside, let's hope Apple can keep the ship upright. The fiasco with the Sonoma 14.4 release better not be a sign of things to come!
    What "fiasco"?
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.