Apple's removable battery standard could change device charging forever

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited March 26

Apple's engineers are researching how to best make a series of standardized enclosures that would allow users to routinely swap batteries between higher-powered devices like an iMac, and lower powered ones like keyboards or other peripherals.

Line drawing of a Mac setup with labeled components including a monitor, wireless keyboard, cell phone, wireless mouse, and various batteries.
Multiple devices would use a standardized case to provide interchangeability between different brands.



If implemented, the technology could lead to a universal standard for battery interchangeability and could reduce or eliminate the need to plug every wireless device in to charge it.

The last Apple device with a "user replaceable" battery was the 2009 MacBook, making it 15 years since users could casually swap out batteries on an Apple mobile computing device to keep it going. Apple isn't alone in using built-in, non-replaceable batteries.

Still, the number of laptops and mobile devices in its lineup means dozens of products rely on regular charging to keep functioning.

The traditional batteries consumers use are standardized and have common names like AA, C, D, and similar. However, consumers should not be expected to know or understand the standard for removable batteries.

The patent application titled "Battery charging system and mobile and accessory devices," demonstrates a potential solution for the needs of power-hungry devices. In the patent, Apple describes standardized sizes of battery "shells" that contain battery cores and the sensors needed for different devices from various manufacturers to detect and use the batteries.

In practice, this may be the internal battery standard version of a protocol like USB-C, where consumers can pick up any battery using this technology and use it to power their device. With a standardized outer casing and connectors, users could swap batteries between devices and easily power them by connecting them to a compatible charger.

In the illustration, interchange batteries are shown being charged in an iMac and installed in cell phones, keyboards, and wireless mice. The letters "C" and "D" don't seem associated with existing standard battery shapes or sizes, and more indicate that different battery sizes could be standardized for different use cases.

Smaller batteries are used for phones, and larger ones are used for keyboards, the iMac, and more.

The removable battery use case



In this illustration, the battery core comprises a typical rechargeable battery pack. The shell and end cap surround it and provide standardized connections for universal charging.

Exploded diagram of a battery with labeled parts: battery shell, core, sensors, sensor terminals, and end cap.
A battery case and end cap would enable various battery packs ot be used.



The patent also describes a system for wireless communication between batteries and a charging station or host computer. It would allow for wireless charging while monitoring and displaying battery power, similar to how the AirPods battery shows up in the Control Center.

Sifting through the patent-law jargon, it appears the universal battery standard would not only power devices but also provide a Mac or other "host" with the information needed to check the status of the batteries. This would likely look similar to how an iPhone can show the battery levels of AirPods or AirTag, but across any device using this battery system.

With standardized batteries and chargers, Apple may eliminate USB cables for powering mobile devices. If you can swap out a battery, why connect it to the USB-C port to juice it up?

As always, this patent application points to possible technologies, not solutions, in development. However, Apple's exploration of interchangeable battery standards may indicate that it is looking to change how devices are powered and possibly dominate a rechargeable battery standard.

This patent continues previous patents credited to Harold Aaron Ludtke. Ludtke is also credited on versions of this patent application that have been filed since 2009, when Apple finally ditched removable battery products from its lineup.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    Monopoly! Lock in!  :D
    apple4thewinForumPostwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 13
    Monopoly! Lock in!  :D
    You’re right! By what’s been happening to Apple lately, it seems like they have to open-source every innovation that would otherwise lead to ecosystem lock-in.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 13
    KTRKTR Posts: 280member
    Monopoly! Lock in!  :D
    You’re right! By what’s been happening to Apple lately, it seems like they have to open-source every innovation that would otherwise lead to ecosystem lock-in.
    I won’t be surprise if they force apple to license all their  operating systems lol
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 13
    This is going to be interesting. Although i can hear the people complaining that now they have to carry an extra battery everywhere you go (although portable chargers exist). A graphene battery will be the best use case for this
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 13
    badmonkbadmonk Posts: 1,295member
    I suspect this patent is related to possible regulation mandating user swapable batteries.
    gatorguywatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 13
    sirdirsirdir Posts: 188member
    That would be good for the customer and make them less money, so it will never happen.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 7 of 13
    People like the idea of user swappable batteries when looked at in a vacuum. I'm sure when they see the size of devices that would be required to incorporate user-swappable batteries using today's battery technology they would sour on that idea really fast. You can have a bigger device or a smaller capacity battery. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
    entropysthtdanoxForumPostwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 13
    coolfactorcoolfactor Posts: 2,245member
    sirdir said:
    That would be good for the customer and make them less money, so it will never happen.

    Have faith. While evidence has revealed Apple's unwillingness to jeopardize their cash cow model, change is inevitable. Carefully.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 13
    thttht Posts: 5,452member
    jetpilot said:
    People like the idea of user swappable batteries when looked at in a vacuum. I'm sure when they see the size of devices that would be required to incorporate user-swappable batteries using today's battery technology they would sour on that idea really fast. You can have a bigger device or a smaller capacity battery. There's no such thing as a free lunch.
    This patent seems more appropriate for Apple products in 2005, not 2024. It’s like they forgot to file it, and decided to do it now just because. 

    Apple had a rechargeable battery product. AA batteries used in the 1st gen wireless keyboard and mouse. It came with its own charger that is compatibles with the removable plug interface on Apple’s external power supplies. So, you could use your existing Mac laptop A/C power cords with it.

    And absolutely, people love the idea more than actually use it. In the end, it is just more convenient to leave the keyboard and mice plugged in. For iPhones, MagSafe is just as good or they leave it plugged in at the desk. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 13
    Apple and Microsoft should cross-license their inventions.  Better yet, they should form a joint venture Apple-Soft.  

    Microsoft has a new solid state lithium-sodium battery that drastically reduces need for lithium.  
    Combine patent in this article with the lithium-sodium battery, and they can corner the battery market.  
    Bye-bye Duracell, Rayovac, Panasonic, LG, Tesla, Johnson Controls...  
    edited March 26 williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 13
    AppleZuluAppleZulu Posts: 2,011member
    The problem, of course, is that user-swappable cell phone batteries are an environmental disaster.

    Anyone who can remember pre-iPhone cell phones will remember that users would generally have a few batteries to swap out for each phone, and usually chargers for the batteries, rather than for the phones. Those batteries have mostly ended up in the back of desk drawers and kitchen junk drawers or the landfill.

    People were scandalized when the iPhone was introduced with a sealed-in battery that wasn't user-serviceable. What that change really means, however, is that most phone batteries probably are now recycled, either when a user takes a phone to the Apple Store for a battery replacement, or when they trade in a phone entirely. It also greatly reduces the number of batteries produced per device.

    Hopefully this is just one of the many notions that Apple patents but doesn't implement. 
    thtwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 13
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,810member
    sirdir said:
    That would be good for the customer and make them less money, so it will never happen.
    So why would just spend the time and money developing it if they knew they were never gonna use it?
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 13
    AppleZuluAppleZulu Posts: 2,011member
    macxpress said:
    sirdir said:
    That would be good for the customer and make them less money, so it will never happen.
    So why would just spend the time and money developing it if they knew they were never gonna use it?
    That’s how research and development works. Only a small fraction of ideas imagined and written up make it to production. Going ahead and patenting them prevents the regret of retrieving an idea previously set aside because it’s time has now arrived, only to find that someone else has patented it in the intervening time. 
    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.