Apple has reportedly dropped Qualcomm modems on two 2025 iPhones

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware

After reportedly committing to using 5G iPhone modems from Qualcomm until 2027, Apple is now said to be ready to deliver its own alternative two years early.

A small Qualcomm SDX60 chip held by metal tweezers against a blurred background.
A Qualcomm 5G modem



Apple's desire to use its own 5G modems instead of Qualcomm's has been behind many years of work. Until now, it has been believed that March 2027 is when the switch will finally happen, but now a report claims it will at least begin much sooner.

According to analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple will introduce its own 5G modems with one high-end and one low-end iPhone during 2025.



The two models include the forthcoming iPhone SE, which Kuo says will be in the first quarter of 2025. The other is a slimmer iPhone 18 Pro model around September 2025.

That slimmer model is believed to be a new high-end flagship iPhone, priced above the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

If Kuo is correct, then it's unusual that Apple would introduce something new to the very top of the range and also the very bottom. It points to this new Apple 5G modem being functionally the same as the Qualcomm one, rather than offering some particular enhanced feature.

That said, if this is to be just a swap of manufacturers, it's now unusual that Apple would do it to two of the four models, instead of all of them. In this case, it's presumably a combination of contractual obligation, and potentially that there is an issue over ramping up sufficient production to fulfill the needs of all four iPhones.

Apple began working on its 5G modem in 2019, when it bought Intel's modem patents for $1 billion. Since then, it has seemingly struggled to develop the technology.

Rumor Score: Possible

Read on AppleInsider

«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 31
    ssfe11ssfe11 Posts: 72member
    Doesn’t look like Apple is “struggling” now. Bringing in house 5G chips is huge and another Apple in house triumph. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to underestimate Tim Cook. Great job!
    edited July 24 danoxgregoriusmwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 31
    y2any2an Posts: 207member
    Not a peculiar move at all. Trial the new modem with phones at the fringe edges of sales volume. Less liability if something goes awry. 
    gregoriusmbeowulfschmidtjas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 31
    The last of the key processors to get the boot along with INTEL, NVIDIA and AMD. Proof! Qualcomm. It will likely stink the motherboard slightly, improve power consumption and certainly reduce costs. Don't be surprised if they eventually integrate it into the SOC.
    danoxgregoriusmwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 31
    thttht Posts: 5,591member
    The two models include the forthcoming iPhone SE, which Kuo says will be in the first quarter of 2025. The other is a slimmer iPhone 18 Pro model around September 2025.
    Does Kuo follow some other calendar than we do?

    iPhone 16 models in 2024
    iPhone 17 models in 2025.
    iPhone 18 models in 2026.

    Makes it sound like he doesn't know what he's talking about.
    twolf2919byronlForumPostwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 31
    thttht Posts: 5,591member
    The last of the key processors to get the boot along with INTEL, NVIDIA and AMD. Proof! Qualcomm. It will likely stink the motherboard slightly, improve power consumption and certainly reduce costs. Don't be surprised if they eventually integrate it into the SOC.
    Hope they can pull it off. Cellular modems should be in all Apple products. They should be in Macs, including the desktops. They should be in AirPods, They should be in the AppleTV. They should be in HomePods. Just everything.

    Still a long ways to go for this rumor. They could get a better deal from Qualcomm and the status quo remains.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 31
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 7,941member
    ssfe11 said:
    Doesn’t look like Apple is “struggling” now. Bringing in house 5G chips is huge and another Apple in house triumph. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to underestimate Tim Cook. Great job!
    Tim Cook can be considered for ultimate blame in not delivering this years ago. 

    He became CEO in 2011. The first mobile 5G modem launched in 2019 following 10 years of development.

    Strategic goals sit firmly at his door. He goofed on Qualcomm and 5G. He got into a worldwide patent spat with a possible 5G supplier (Qualcomm, one of very few) and had no real alternative to already poor performing Intel modems.

    When 5G hit mobile, Intel failed to deliver (was that a surprise seeing how their 4G modems performed?) and Apple was caught with its pants down. 

    Suddenly it was kiss-and-make-up with Qualcomm (basically on the steps of the court with battle about to commence), signing a deal for them to supply Apple with (back then) an older bolted-on modem (a true Yikes! moment) and Apple bought Intel's failing 5G modem division. 

    They've been rushing (and seemingly failing) to deliver ever since. They then signed the longer term deal with Qualcomm mentioned in the article.

    Strategically, an in-house 5G modem was only considered very late in the day and as a result of earlier failed strategic decisions. They basically had to 'lick the toad' and get on with it. We can conclude that, strategically speaking, there was never an in-house 5G modem on the road map.

    In terms of forward thinking I can confirm that Apple is currently working in a group in Europe including Huawei on network sensing technologies but that is for 6G.
    edited July 24 gatorguymuthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 7 of 31
    melgrossmelgross Posts: 33,598member
    tht said:
    The last of the key processors to get the boot along with INTEL, NVIDIA and AMD. Proof! Qualcomm. It will likely stink the motherboard slightly, improve power consumption and certainly reduce costs. Don't be surprised if they eventually integrate it into the SOC.
    Hope they can pull it off. Cellular modems should be in all Apple products. They should be in Macs, including the desktops. They should be in AirPods, They should be in the AppleTV. They should be in HomePods. Just everything.

    Still a long ways to go for this rumor. They could get a better deal from Qualcomm and the status quo remains.
    the interesting thing for me is the cost of cellular. apple has paid a high price for qualcomm's chips, which is why the lawsuits. if apple can produce these for less, then hopefully they can charge less. it would be nice to see the option for cellular drop from about $130 to maybe $50. but it that cant happen then we won't see them in less expensive devices. i don't think qualcomm will give them a much better deal than theyre getting now. and as we know, apple does want to be as vertical as possible. another thing is that with qualcomm chips you can get the modem on the SoC. but qualcomm has never given apple permission for that. with all the talk about apple being a monopoly, i dont understsnd why the government has never looked into that.

    by the way. apple seems to have changed my keyboard snd theres no auto correction, capitalization, or anything. not being used to that on my ipads ive not corrected a number of things. hopefully ill be able to get the normsl one back. i havent been able to in settings so far. its amazing how you get used to those things.

    ok, after nothing worked. I turned the iPad completely off and back on, and back to normal. That was weird. But then, I’m on the 18 beta. That was the first glitch so far. I suppose I should report it.
    edited July 24 danoxbyronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 31
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,505member
    tht said:
    The two models include the forthcoming iPhone SE, which Kuo says will be in the first quarter of 2025. The other is a slimmer iPhone 18 Pro model around September 2025.
    Does Kuo follow some other calendar than we do?

    iPhone 16 models in 2024
    iPhone 17 models in 2025.
    iPhone 18 models in 2026.

    Makes it sound like he doesn't know what he's talking about.
    In articles on other sites he appears to refer to an iPhone 17 Slim, and a stripped down phone at that.  Perhaps AppleInsider made an error on one number and did not mean iPhone 18? 
    byronlForumPostwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 31
    neoncatneoncat Posts: 163member
    if apple can produce these for less, then hopefully they can charge less. it would be nice to see the option for cellular drop from about $130 to maybe $50.

    On what planet is Apple—king of the upsell and margins so fluffy and plush it'd make a down jacket blush—going to pass along even a nickel of cost savings? Are you completely out of your mind? 
    edited July 24 gatorguyForumPostwilliamlondonbeowulfschmidt
  • Reply 10 of 31
    sflocalsflocal Posts: 6,121member
    This is great news.  The stunt that Qualcomm pulled back then with their predatory practices began what is now will be their downfall.  Judging by QCOM's selloff today when the market opened this morning, Qualcomm has a lot of wounds to lick.

    When Qualcomm demanded not only the price of the chip, but also a percentage of every iPhone sale Apple made then I knew this company was doomed.  Good riddance Qualcomm.
    ssfe11tmayForumPostwilliamlondonjas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 31
    thttht Posts: 5,591member
    melgross said:
    tht said:
    The last of the key processors to get the boot along with INTEL, NVIDIA and AMD. Proof! Qualcomm. It will likely stink the motherboard slightly, improve power consumption and certainly reduce costs. Don't be surprised if they eventually integrate it into the SOC.
    Hope they can pull it off. Cellular modems should be in all Apple products. They should be in Macs, including the desktops. They should be in AirPods, They should be in the AppleTV. They should be in HomePods. Just everything.

    Still a long ways to go for this rumor. They could get a better deal from Qualcomm and the status quo remains.
    the interesting thing for me is the cost of cellular. apple has paid a high price for qualcomm's chips, which is why the lawsuits. if apple can produce these for less, then hopefully they can charge less. it would be nice to see the option for cellular drop from about $130 to maybe $50. but it that cant happen then we won't see them in less expensive devices. i don't think qualcomm will give them a much better deal than theyre getting now. and as we know, apple does want to be as vertical as possible. another thing is that with qualcomm chips you can get the modem on the SoC. but qualcomm has never given apple permission for that. with all the talk about apple being a monopoly, i dont understsnd why the government has never looked into that.
    The cost of the hardware, the physical layers, will probably stick around at $100 to $200 options, depending on the cellular tech. The real cost to consumers for cellular is the data service. It's going to be $5 to $50 per line depending on device. Cheaper for Watches, more expensive for Macs. A Mac data plan could be $50/mo. That's $600 per year. Pricy! My family cellular plan is our second biggest expense after insurance for obvious reasons.

    If Apple is shipping its own modem, I think they could do virtually anything they want. A discrete chip. An on-die block in the SoC. A chip in the package. Who knows. Probably guaranteed that they will be sued by 5G patent holders. The patent licensing will be the biggest expense that the upgrade option has to cover.

    I do really like the idea of every device having cellular with GB of data that you could buy whenever you want. Like, I could bring my Apple TV on trip and just buy data for it instead of relying on hotel, AirBnB WiFi. If it was just a builtin hardware feature, I think it would be a very nice benefit for users. Apple could also provide the data service itself as well.
    jas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 31
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,210member
    ssfe11 said:
    Doesn’t look like Apple is “struggling” now. Bringing in house 5G chips is huge and another Apple in house triumph. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to underestimate Tim Cook. Great job!
    If true six years of research and development is money well spent in comparison to Microsofts 69 billion dollar game company fiasco acquisition. The future devices that Apple can now build having control of a in house modem is huge right up there with having Apple Silicon in house. Another reason to pick up a few more shares of Apple Computer.

    edited July 24 ssfe11jas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 31
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,210member

    tht said:
    The last of the key processors to get the boot along with INTEL, NVIDIA and AMD. Proof! Qualcomm. It will likely stink the motherboard slightly, improve power consumption and certainly reduce costs. Don't be surprised if they eventually integrate it into the SOC.
    Hope they can pull it off. Cellular modems should be in all Apple products. They should be in Macs, including the desktops. They should be in AirPods, They should be in the AppleTV. They should be in HomePods. Just everything.

    Still a long ways to go for this rumor. They could get a better deal from Qualcomm and the status quo remains.

    It took 13 years for Apple to replace Intel, a six-eight year project or even another 13 year project is nothing particularly for the long range possibilities, again if true Apple is one step closer to having Apple Vision fit on to a pair of glasses. That can only happen if Qualcomm is out of the picture.....
    edited July 24 jas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 31
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,210member

    avon b7 said:
    ssfe11 said:
    Doesn’t look like Apple is “struggling” now. Bringing in house 5G chips is huge and another Apple in house triumph. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to underestimate Tim Cook. Great job!
    Tim Cook can be considered for ultimate blame in not delivering this years ago. 

    He became CEO in 2011. The first mobile 5G modem launched in 2019 following 10 years of development.

    Strategic goals sit firmly at his door. He goofed on Qualcomm and 5G. He got into a worldwide patent spat with a possible 5G supplier (Qualcomm, one of very few) and had no real alternative to already poor performing Intel modems.

    When 5G hit mobile, Intel failed to deliver (was that a surprise seeing how their 4G modems performed?) and Apple was caught with its pants down. 

    Suddenly it was kiss-and-make-up with Qualcomm (basically on the steps of the court with battle about to commence), signing a deal for them to supply Apple with (back then) an older bolted-on modem (a true Yikes! moment) and Apple bought Intel's failing 5G modem division. 

    They've been rushing (and seemingly failing) to deliver ever since. They then signed the longer term deal with Qualcomm mentioned in the article.

    Strategically, an in-house 5G modem was only considered very late in the day and as a result of earlier failed strategic decisions. They basically had to 'lick the toad' and get on with it. We can conclude that, strategically speaking, there was never an in-house 5G modem on the road map.

    In terms of forward thinking I can confirm that Apple is currently working in a group in Europe including Huawei on network sensing technologies but that is for 6G.

    Shortsighted, It took 13 years for Apple to replace Intel with Apple Silicon see the shambolic Intel today? Apple is well rid of them.
    jas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 31
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,210member

    sflocal said:
    This is great news.  The stunt that Qualcomm pulled back then with their predatory practices began what is now will be their downfall.  Judging by QCOM's selloff today when the market opened this morning, Qualcomm has a lot of wounds to lick.

    When Qualcomm demanded not only the price of the chip, but also a percentage of every iPhone sale Apple made then I knew this company was doomed.  Good riddance Qualcomm.
    Qualcomm is right up there with Intel and Microsoft at their peak. But their hookup with Microsoft has been a fumble so far right up there with other recent Microsoft ventures Recall, and their third party IT friend Cloudstrike. Microsoft isn't ahead of Apple user inertia is the only thing saving them.
    jas99watto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 31
    twolf2919twolf2919 Posts: 133member
    y2an said:
    Not a peculiar move at all. Trial the new modem with phones at the fringe edges of sales volume. Less liability if something goes awry. 
    Except that the "Pro" models are not at the fringe edge of sales volume:
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 17 of 31
    twolf2919twolf2919 Posts: 133member
    tht said:
    The two models include the forthcoming iPhone SE, which Kuo says will be in the first quarter of 2025. The other is a slimmer iPhone 18 Pro model around September 2025.
    Does Kuo follow some other calendar than we do?

    iPhone 16 models in 2024
    iPhone 17 models in 2025.
    iPhone 18 models in 2026.

    Makes it sound like he doesn't know what he's talking about.
    Or it could just be poor editing on Apple Insider's side.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 31
    avon b7avon b7 Posts: 7,941member
    danox said:

    avon b7 said:
    ssfe11 said:
    Doesn’t look like Apple is “struggling” now. Bringing in house 5G chips is huge and another Apple in house triumph. The biggest mistake anyone can make is to underestimate Tim Cook. Great job!
    Tim Cook can be considered for ultimate blame in not delivering this years ago. 

    He became CEO in 2011. The first mobile 5G modem launched in 2019 following 10 years of development.

    Strategic goals sit firmly at his door. He goofed on Qualcomm and 5G. He got into a worldwide patent spat with a possible 5G supplier (Qualcomm, one of very few) and had no real alternative to already poor performing Intel modems.

    When 5G hit mobile, Intel failed to deliver (was that a surprise seeing how their 4G modems performed?) and Apple was caught with its pants down. 

    Suddenly it was kiss-and-make-up with Qualcomm (basically on the steps of the court with battle about to commence), signing a deal for them to supply Apple with (back then) an older bolted-on modem (a true Yikes! moment) and Apple bought Intel's failing 5G modem division. 

    They've been rushing (and seemingly failing) to deliver ever since. They then signed the longer term deal with Qualcomm mentioned in the article.

    Strategically, an in-house 5G modem was only considered very late in the day and as a result of earlier failed strategic decisions. They basically had to 'lick the toad' and get on with it. We can conclude that, strategically speaking, there was never an in-house 5G modem on the road map.

    In terms of forward thinking I can confirm that Apple is currently working in a group in Europe including Huawei on network sensing technologies but that is for 6G.

    Shortsighted, It took 13 years for Apple to replace Intel with Apple Silicon see the shambolic Intel today? Apple is well rid of them.
    But where would Apple have been without Intel back then? And what about the competition that is coming through now? 
  • Reply 19 of 31
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,980member
    5G still? - or 6G...

    Apple had to design aroudn all the 5G patents. That's what made it take so long.

    Makes more sense to jump into 6G and lead the way.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 31
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 2,980member

    neoncat said:
    if apple can produce these for less, then hopefully they can charge less. it would be nice to see the option for cellular drop from about $130 to maybe $50.

    On what planet is Apple—king of the upsell and margins so fluffy and plush it'd make a down jacket blush—going to pass along even a nickel of cost savings? Are you completely out of your mind? 
    Apple is ore likely to charge a premium - see Apple Silicon transition.
    edited July 24 neoncatwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.