Fortnite coming to iPhones in the EU via AltStore

Posted:
in iPhone

Even with the Epic Games Store set to launch in the EU on iPhone, Epic has announced its games will be coming to other alternative app stores that "give developers a great deal," like AltStore PAL.

The Fortnite logo surrounded by game characters
Fortnite is coming to the AltStore in the EU



The battle of Apple versus Epic may never end, with the latest chapter unfolding around EU regulations like the Digital Markets Act. Now that third-party stores and sideloading exist for EU iPhone users, Epic has an avenue to bring Fortnite back to the platform.

Plans are already underway to bring the Epic Games Store to iOS and Android devices later in 2024, but that's not the only destination for Fortnite on iPhone. Epic has also announced that it will distribute its games on third-party app stores.

The short blog post detailed that Epic will end distribution partnerships with mobile stores that serve as "rent collectors" in favor of stores that give developers a "great deal." This means leaving the Samsung Galaxy Store in favor of stores like the AltStore PAL.

AltStore is the distributor for Delta, the Nintendo emulator that helped pioneer allowing emulators on iPhone in and out of the EU.

No timelines were announced, but the return of Fortnite to iPhone has been long coming. Tim Sweeney promised a release in 2023, but it is now expected by the end of 2024.

Fortnite's return comes after years of legal battles between Apple and Epic in the United States. Despite Apple winning that battle on almost every front, Epic is finally able to skirt Apple's in-app purchase system entirely in the EU.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 12
    As a Fortnite player and Apple devotee I could not care less about this. There are way to many game mechanics to have any fun on such a tiny screen or even to use touch controls. 
    darbus69beowulfschmidtwilliamlondondewme
  • Reply 2 of 12
    Fortnite was already available on iOS via three different browser game streaming platforms.
    sphericdewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 12
    macxpressmacxpress Posts: 5,898member
    I can't wait for this to be a failure so Mr Sweeney can bitch and complain again about how Apple's App Store practices are unfair after he can't even get people to buy his apps and addon's via a 3rd party store. 
    darbus69teejay2012williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 12
    nubusnubus Posts: 553member
    macxpress said:
    I can't wait for this to be a failure so Mr Sweeney can bitch and complain again about how Apple's App Store practices are unfair after he can't even get people to buy his apps and addon's via a 3rd party store. 
    Triple-A gaming on iOS is a failure with Fornite being the exception. The fact that Apple didn't make a quiet "marketing kickback" deal but allowed fragmentation of App Store is on Apple. Will it work? It takes devoted users to make this happen and Fortnite users are devoted.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 5 of 12
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,093member
    nubus said:
    macxpress said:
    I can't wait for this to be a failure so Mr Sweeney can bitch and complain again about how Apple's App Store practices are unfair after he can't even get people to buy his apps and addon's via a 3rd party store. 
    Triple-A gaming on iOS is a failure with Fornite being the exception. The fact that Apple didn't make a quiet "marketing kickback" deal but allowed fragmentation of App Store is on Apple. Will it work? It takes devoted users to make this happen and Fortnite users are devoted.
    A "quiet" "marketing kickback" deal? Nothing is "quiet" with that sleazeball Sweeney. Google tried to make a "marketing kickball" deal with that sleazeball and Sweeney ended up using it against Google in their Google Play Store monopoly lawsuit. Sweeney used that offered deal (and other deals that Google had made other developers) as evidence (to a jury) that Google was being anti-competitive and behaving like an illegal  monopolist with the monopoly power they had with their Google Play Store. Apple did nothing wrong by not making any "quiet" deal with such a sleazeball. It is totally on Sweeney, that Epic Games had loss hundreds of millions of dollars of revenue on both iOS and Android, by violating their respective app store policies and getting the boot. 


    >Google’s dealings with app developers played a prominent role during the trial. In particular, Epic repeatedly pointed to an initiative called “Project Hug” where the company paid major game developers like Activision and Nintendo millions of dollars in incentives to keep their wares in the Play store and persuade them not to create their own rival stores. The stakes were high. Activision alone was reportedly offered $350m. Epic was offered $147m to keep Fortnite on Google Play. Google documents reportedly referred to Epic in this case as a worrisome “contagon” that could cause other developers to defect.

    “None of those circumstances, as I understand it, exists in the Apple case,” said Katherine Van Dyck, senior legal council for the American Economic Liberties Project. “In the Apple case, it’s simply that Apple only has one App Store and won’t allow any others.”<








    edited July 26 nubusdewmeecatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 12
    AppleZuluAppleZulu Posts: 2,120member
    Let’s hope this scheme is a colossal failure. 

    Seems like a real-world analog would be a company pulling its popular product from major retailers and making it exclusively available via skeevy back-alley storefronts. Only selling your product in places that require customers to go way out of their way to locations that don’t get much foot traffic and that inherently feel (and are) less safe doesn’t seem like a recipe for success. 

    I mean, if someone built an inviting “alternate app store,” it would ultimately not qualify for Epic’s distribution terms, because any quality app store would have to charge for its services. Quality isn’t free. 

    So Epic’s terms will mean Fortnite will only be available via shady distribution services. If they can’t charge the vendor, they’ll have to use other means to monetize the customer. That leads straight to schemes to track the customer and sell their data to the highest bidder. 

    Phone users aren’t the ones demanding alternative app stores and side-loading schemes. Only app developers seeking a free ride and/or greater freedom to scam their customers want this. Hopefully the “free market” will prove that, as customers opt not to jump through hoops just to get products from unscrupulous vendors. 
    edited July 26 williamlondondewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 12
    croprcropr Posts: 1,137member
    AppleZulu said:
    Let’s hope this scheme is a colossal failure. 

    I mean, if someone built an inviting “alternate app store,” it would ultimately not qualify for Epic’s distribution terms, because any quality app store would have to charge for its services. Quality isn’t free. 


    You listen way too good to the Apple Marketing machine. 

    Setting up a quality, secure app distribution system is not really rocket science and can be established in a very cost efficient way.    I've done it for an set of apps (mainly Windows and MacOs apps).  The cost of such a distribution system is mainly driven by the volume of downloaded bytes, not by the value of the apps.   And we are speaking of a few cents per GB of downloaded data

    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondondewme
  • Reply 8 of 12
    nubusnubus Posts: 553member
    davidw said:
    nubus said:
    macxpress said:
    I can't wait for this to be a failure so Mr Sweeney can bitch and complain again about how Apple's App Store practices are unfair after he can't even get people to buy his apps and addon's via a 3rd party store. 
    Triple-A gaming on iOS is a failure with Fornite being the exception. The fact that Apple didn't make a quiet "marketing kickback" deal but allowed fragmentation of App Store is on Apple. Will it work? It takes devoted users to make this happen and Fortnite users are devoted.
    A "quiet" "marketing kickback" deal? Nothing is "quiet" with that sleazeball Sweeney. Google tried to make a "marketing kickball" deal with that sleazeball and Sweeney ended up using it against Google in their Google Play Store monopoly lawsuit. 
    That is something! A CEO that can't be bought is indeed difficult to handle.
    This is much like the letter from Jobs that killed Flash.

    The troublemakers.
    They have no respect for status quo.
    About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them.Because they change things.
    While some see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
    Think Different! I would hire him.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 9 of 12
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,093member
    This same CEO that "couldn't be bought", but is more than willing to buy out others for his Epic Game Store "exclusives". He don't seem to have a problem with making "marketing kickbacks" deals that prevented game developers from selling their games in other PC gaming stores, to developers that are willing to be bought out.

     
    The same "genius" CEO that saw fit to run his company like this .........







    Remember, no one hired Sweeney to be CEO of epic Games. He inherited the job by being its founder and majority share holder. Plus he sold 40% of his company to Tencent, one of China's largest company with a dark side. If he was "hired" to run Epic Games, he would have been fired by now, genius or not. 


    >Amnesty International gave Tencent a score of zero out of 100 for the company's treatment of data. Raising questions about the potential misuse of user information.<

    edited July 26 williamlondonecatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 12
    nubusnubus Posts: 553member
    davidw said:
    This same CEO that "couldn't be bought", but is more than willing to buy out others for his Epic Game Store "exclusives". He don't seem to have a problem with making "marketing kickbacks" deals that prevented game developers from selling their games in other PC gaming stores, to developers that are willing to be bought out.
    He sounds like one fierce CEO and founder.

    Jobs killed Flash but hired the guy behind it (Kevin Lynch) which then delivered Apple Watch and is now VP of Technology at Apple. This is how you as a CEO combine your principles with business. I would rather have him than a penny-pinching bean counter. Make him responsible for gaming at Apple.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 11 of 12
    nubus said:
    davidw said:
    nubus said:
    macxpress said:
    I can't wait for this to be a failure so Mr Sweeney can bitch and complain again about how Apple's App Store practices are unfair after he can't even get people to buy his apps and addon's via a 3rd party store. 
    Triple-A gaming on iOS is a failure with Fornite being the exception. The fact that Apple didn't make a quiet "marketing kickback" deal but allowed fragmentation of App Store is on Apple. Will it work? It takes devoted users to make this happen and Fortnite users are devoted.
    A "quiet" "marketing kickback" deal? Nothing is "quiet" with that sleazeball Sweeney. Google tried to make a "marketing kickball" deal with that sleazeball and Sweeney ended up using it against Google in their Google Play Store monopoly lawsuit. 
    That is something! A CEO that can't be bought is indeed difficult to handle.
    This is much like the letter from Jobs that killed Flash.

    The troublemakers.
    They have no respect for status quo.
    About the only thing you can’t do is ignore them.
    Because they change things.
    While some see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.

    Think Different! I would hire him.
    Saying he can't be bought is not exactly correct.  He is most certainly for sale and tried to get a side deal with Apple prior to his failed lawsuit, something he still lies about to this day. His public rhetoric and his proven track records are really at odds with each other. 
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 12
    ecatsecats Posts: 273member
    Epic was fined by the FTC for tricking kids into making unwanted purchases in Fortnite.
    Epic stonewalled their parent's attempts at getting refunds, going so far as killing their kids Fortnite accounts if they did charge backs.

    In the FTC's evidence, Epic's internal communications showed that they deliberately implemented these dark patterns specifically for this result. They planned it that way all along, and even optimised it to happen more often.

    This is a company which people need to be wary of, not celebrated.

    What you should be doing is downloading Fortnite once per year as an ongoing punishment for their reprehensible exploitation of children and soiling the good will of game developers. 

    That $1 CTF charge, one per user, every year. Give them the monkey paw treatment for their boundless greed.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.