Epic Games & Spotify unsurprisingly unhappy with Apple's latest DMA update
Epic CEO Tim Sweeney was quick to criticize Apple's new fee structure in the EU, calling them "junk fees," while Spotify said the update is "unacceptable."
'Fortnite' maker isn't happy with Apple's revised DMA rules
Apple's initial attempt at following the EU's Digital Markets Act didn't pan out, with the EU finding it in breach. So, Apple announced a revision to its terms in an attempt to comply while still maintaining some level of control.
It didn't take long for some of Apple's biggest antagonists to take the stage and declare the new rules a violation. Epic CEO Tim Sweeney took to X to air his complaints, calling Apple's latest adjustments a "junk fee."
In the European Union where the new DMA law opens up app store competition, Apple continues its malicious compliance by imposing an illegal new 15% junk fee on users migrating to competing stores and monitor commerce on these competing stores.https://t.co/YUYwsnrh32 pic.twitter.com/xAWGkOWPrH
— Tim Sweeney (@TimSweeneyEpic)
A statement shared by Spotify and first covered by TechCrunch shows the company's own disdain for Apple's implementation. It sees Apple's latest rule change as disregarding the DMA.
We are currently assessing Apple's deliberately confusing proposal," the company statement reads. "At first glance, by demanding as much as a 25% fee for basic communication with users, Apple once again blatantly disregards the fundamental requirements of the Digital Markets Act (DMA). The European Commission has made it clear that imposing recurring fees on basic elements like pricing and linking is unacceptable. We call on the Commission to expedite its investigation, implement daily fines and enforce the DMA."
These comments come after Apple adjusted the fee structure surrounding alternative app stores and external app fees. The Core Technology Fee remains, but the previous commission has been split into two new fees.
The first is an Initial Acquisition Fee, where Apple charges 5% of any purchase made by a new app user for the first year if the app uses links to direct users out of the App Store. The second is a Store Services Fee that is 10% of any sale in the first year.
If the app is re-installed or updated, the year counter restarts.
There are variations to the fee based on whether the developer is being grandfathered into the new rules or if they are part of the small business program. Either way, there is no escaping Apple's fee structure, even when offering purchases outside of Apple's domain.
It seems Epic and Spotify expect the EU to rule that Apple must not collect any fee on app sales or purchases made outside of the App Store. Of course, Apple believes it has a stake in these purchases because the user gained access to the app through the App Store.
Epic doesn't currently operate on the iPhone, though it is planning a third-party store and will distribute Fortnite and other games through other stores like AltStore. Spotify is the most popular music streaming service on earth and currently pays Apple very little, if any money, beyond the $100 developer fee.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
im going into Walmart today and demand they give me eye level shelf space for FREE to sell my product and I don’t care about their overhead costs(heat, light, advertising, security, safety etc)! If they don’t I’m calling the Justice Dept!
It would be far simpler and faster to, in this case at least and probably others, come out and tell Apple very specifically what they will have to do to satisfy DMA. Then the two have something to negotiate.
As it is, Apple will prod in one direction and then the push in the next, just as many for-profit companies would, until they know where the hard lines lay. This is so time-consuming and expensive when all the EU needed to do after the first silly and unreasonable Apple proposal: Tell them what they must do, not wait to respond to each version of a possibly by not likely acceptable one. Then the world becomes simple. Leave the EU marketplace, comply, or go to court. As it is, they'll drag this out for several more months, well into next year, without ever finding agreement.
Having a law where those it applies to are expected to say “here's what I'll do, let me know” instead of the authority saying “here is what you WILL do” is a horribly designed law.
There are major costs associated with SW and I'm afraid of how IOS, Xcode, App Store and all those advancements we see each year at WWDC could hurt users if companies like Epic and Spotify keep making all the rules.
Both the illegal anti-competitive kickbacks Apple took from Google and the handling of App Store indicate that something is rotten with Apple Services. We could see Apple banned from distributing apps.
Apple's goal from the beginning was inventing consumer hardware devices. Having a software system capable of operating a smartphone or tablet was a necessary sub-development, not the goal. It's in hardware that ongoing iOS development is monetized. If there were no Apple hardware to run it, the OS would have zero value unless they go the Microsoft route and license it to computer or smartphone manufacturers for their own hardware.
Anyway, I'm sure when that slide was presented it was relevant to that particular discussion. It doesn't make it applicable here.
Apple can only do this as a gatekeeper. DMA is all about making sure it doesn't happen.