Massive iPhone array will replace English Premiere League's awful video referee tech

Posted:
in iPhone edited August 14

The English Premier League will be upgrading its existing and widely panned refereeing technology with a new system that will rely on iPhones to ensure soccer players obey the infamous offside rule.

A soccer ball with colorful patterns rests on a grassy field in an empty stadium with covered stands in the background.
A soccer ball on a pitch



For years, the English Premier League has employed a video-assistant referee (VAR) to check whether players are offside when a goal is scored in high-level soccer matches. The rule, which refers to the position of players when a goal is scored, has been difficult enough to monitor by on-pitch officials, prompting the need for a fourth external official.

While VAR relies on an official watching positioned cameras and theoretically should solve the monitoring issue, it hasn't been ideal. Its limitations, including delays and errors, has made it a hated part of modern soccer.

To avoid the problems VAR has, the League is bringing out a new system for the 2024-2025 season. Referred to internally as "Dragon," Wired reports the system will center around the iPhone.

Using dozens of iPhones around the pitch, high frame rate video will be captured and fed into a software tool, which will allow the smartphones to work together. The video is processed by the system, and can then identify the positions of players.

Pitchside viewers



At least 28 iPhones will be used in every Premier League stadium, with the built-in cameras of the iPhone 14 and newer models being used. Each waterproof housing contains up to four iPhones, as well as fans and a power source, and are positioned at key points around the pitch.

It's claimed the system could be easily scaled up, depending on the future needs of the game. If more data is required about certain parts of the pitch, more cameras could be deployed to collect it.

The result is a system that can track between 7,000 and 10,000 points on each player throughout the match. By contrast, previously employed systems could measure 30 to 50 data points on a player.

It is claimed that the system is able to mitigate the occlusion problem, when parts of a player are not able to be seen by any of the positioned cameras due to other players on the field and stadium geometry. Part of this is that the system will capture up to 200 frames per second, beating the 50 or 60 fps rates of broadcast cameras used for VAR.

Mean machine



It's even expected that the system will be able to detect upcoming events, such as a potential offside call. When these are detected, the frame rate can be scaled up for nearby cameras to cover the moment and increase accuracy.

The software driving it all is based on machine learning. Based on the work of Genius Sports on capturing movement in the NBA, the system was trained on several seasons of soccer footage to learn when offside should be called.

While AI will make a call based on what it detects for itself, it won't make the decision official for a match. Instead, a human will continue to monitor and make the final match-impacting call.

Tested, but needs validation



Following the use of VAR, it's likely that soccer fans will be wary of new technology being introduced to the game. However, Genius and the EPL believe it's gone through enough testing.

This has included validation by FIFA, which used players in a more traditional motion capture system being monitored by the system and the data sets compared. The Premier League is certainly satisfied with its accuracy.

"We are confident that by using the newest and most accurate technology available we will see the time taken for offside decisions reduced significantly alongside a consistent application of the offside lines," said Premier League Chief Football Officer Tony Scholes.

Even so, football followers probably won't have confidence in the system until they see it in action and working properly.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 7
    Reminds me of my former roommate jumping up in arms every time they call VAR. 🤣😂
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 7
    Feel sorry for the person that has to go around all the 28 iPhones tapping the "are you still sure you want this app to access the camera" alert 🤣
    tenthousandthingsmknelsonapple4thewinleehammdewmeblastdoorddawson100watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 7
    VAR worked well in European games and internationals. It is not the tech that's faulty in England. It's the officials. There is enough inconsistency in the stats to show bias from officials. The poor view of the video cameras and parallax and perspective problems made this worse, as fans never got an official explanation for a given decision until several days later.

    That said, I am interested to see how this works. Goal-line tech [which. uses a different system] has worked well for years but offside can occur anywhere in a half of the field, so positioning is rather important.
    dewmerealjustinlongwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 7
    Feel sorry for the person that has to go around all the 28 iPhones tapping the "are you still sure you want this app to access the camera" alert 🤣
    28 cameras is still only 7 per quarter of the pitch, assuming they are on both sides. That's a camera every 7m or so. But yes, maintenance sounds like a full-time job!
    realjustinlongrealjustinlongwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 7
    The main technology issue has always been the placement of the limited number of cameras and the perspective they can capture. Currently VAR uses 42 cameras so if they are replacing those with just 28 cameras that seems less than ideal.

    In the 22WC they used 12 (I believe additional) tracking cameras along with sensors in the ball to help determine the exact time the ball was actually kicked to help with the automated offside decisions but even with that there was still controversy and wrong calls from either human error or a lack of consistent training and standards for the human referees.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 7
    thedbathedba Posts: 776member
    leehamm said:
    VAR worked well in European games and internationals. It is not the tech that's faulty in England. It's the officials. There is enough inconsistency in the stats to show bias from officials. The poor view of the video cameras and parallax and perspective problems made this worse, as fans never got an official explanation for a given decision until several days later.

    That said, I am interested to see how this works. Goal-line tech [which. uses a different system] has worked well for years but offside can occur anywhere in a half of the field, so positioning is rather important.
    I remember VAR being awkward the first season they used it but got refined in subsequent seasons.
    As far as offsides, which is the topic of this article, VAR has been pretty effective.
    This technology being discussed, will just add more data points thus, in theory, making it more accurate.
    watto_cobraForumPost
  • Reply 7 of 7
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,520member
    For a while now, the iPhone could be better described as a camera that also makes phone calls. 

    Of course, it could be even better described as a pocket computer with a great camera. But these days we don’t like calling computers computers.
    watto_cobraForumPost
Sign In or Register to comment.