Protests at Apple Stores in multiple cities mar iPhone 16 launch

Posted:
in General Discussion

Demonstrators in a dozen cities in the US and other countries took advantage of the publicity of the iPhone 16 launch to call for a boycott of Apple products. The protests included some current and former Apple employees.

Protesters encourage Apple boycott in front of a store in Tokyo. Photo: Tomohiro Onsumi
Protesters encourage Apple boycott in front of a store in Tokyo. Photo: Tomohiro Onsumi



The new demonstrations at Apple Stores centered around accusations of ignoring violence in both the Democratic Republic of Congo in Africa, as well as the ongoing hostilities between Gaza and Israel.

The protesters accuse Apple of being complicit in the humanitarian crises in both conflict zones. A protester identified as "Lucy" by the Bristol Post news site was quoted as saying they were protesting "against Apple's complicity in the Congelese and Palestinian genocides."

Apple gets gold, along with a group of minerals collectively called "3T" -- tantalum, tin, and tungsten -- from the Congo for use in iPhones. International groups say while Apple ended some relationships with smelters and refiners in the Congo in 2019, it continues to get raw and finished materials from other suppliers there.

Apple's involvement in Israel includes owning the second-largest research and development center in the country, which has been in operation since at least 2015. This follows a letter from some 300 Apple employees in April 2024 calling on the company to do more for the Palestinian community.

Protesters accuse Apple of complicty



Lucy noted that in Congo, "militia backed by Uganda and Rwanda steal coltan and are killing [and] raping people, and are enslaving men, women, and children to mine the coltan in dangerous conditions. Apple buys this coltan." The Democratic Republic of Congo has been embroiled in armed conflict against rebels backed by Rwanda since the 1990s.

Apple gets materials used in the iPhone and other products from war-torn Congo.
Apple gets materials used in the iPhone and other products from war-torn Congo.



Another protester identified as "Soraya" noted in April 2024 that Apple has remained silent on the war in Gaza, despite pressure from some of its own employees. Soraya noted that in October 2023, CEO Tim Cook had said that his "heart goes out to the victims," but there had been no further comment since.

More, in November 2023, Apple briefly paused Slack channels used by, respectively, Jewish and Muslim employees. It was subsequently claimed by protesters that Apple had in fact shut down the Slack channel used by Muslim employees.

Then in April 2024, an Apple Store in the Chicago area reportedly fired an employee for wearing a keffiyeh, a traditional Palestinian garment. This resulted in protest in front of the Lincoln Park Apple Store in Chicago, organized by a group calling itself Apples4Ceasefire.

The protesters outside Apple Stores for the iPhone 16 launch are calling for consumers to boycott Apple products, and unsubscribe from services such as iCloud+ and Apple Music in protest.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 4
    The protest industrial complex needs constant feeding, but it can only eat junk food; high-quality nutrients will kill it dead.
    mac daddy zee
  • Reply 2 of 4
    So, boycott them? Then where do we go for our devices, because Apple is bad, but amongst its competitors it is clearly better. No reason not to let the protesters drive them to be better, but boycotting the best of the lot is like that scene in Blazing Saddles where the sheriff holds a gun to his own head.
    DAalsethmac daddy zee
  • Reply 3 of 4
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,497member
    I don't see anything wrong with encouraging Apple through protests and other methods to "be better" on environmental and moral/ethical issues, but this particular protest may have some flaws.

    For example: YES, it's bad that Apple relies on Congo for supplies of coltran, given the situation there. But is there another more ethical source Apple could be using to get the amount of coltran it needs? I don't know, but I suspect not -- Apple tends to avoid using controversial suppliers if possible.

    As for the other issue, Apple having a facility in Israel does not in and of itself make it pro-Israel. Cook commented on the initial attack by Hamas in a condemning way, but I think it's very unlikely that he doesn't care or actively dislikes Palestinian people. But why would he ever wade into the myriad complexities of the middle east other than to bemoan a loss of life? He's not stupid.
    ilarynx
  • Reply 4 of 4
    hexclockhexclock Posts: 1,301member
    It’s not Apple’s job to govern or even comment on world events. 
    mac daddy zee
Sign In or Register to comment.