Apple Vision Pro rumored to get M5 in 2025, but lower cost model is delayed

Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited November 3
Apple Vision Pro may get an M5 upgrade in 2025, but the expected lower-price headset has been delayed, and may offload processing to the iPhone to cut costs.

Close-up of Apple Vision Pro headset with reflective, glossy black surface and blue tint, surrounded by blurred people in the background.
Apple Vision Pro on display at Apple Park. Image credit: Apple
Ming-Chi Kuo

says that production of an all-new version of the Apple Vision Pro has been pushed back to "beyond 2027." He claims that the current existing model will be replaced with an identical one upgraded to an M5 processor in 2025.

As I understand it, production of the cheaper Vision Pro has been delayed beyond 2027 for a while now. This means Apple's only new head-mounted display device in 2025 will be the Vision Pro with an upgraded M5 processor.

I think what really drove Apple to delay the cheaper

-- (Ming-Chi Kuo) (@mingchikuo)



He says that Apple has chosen to delay a rumored less-expensive Apple Vision Pro due to reasoning that "simply reducing the price wouldn't help create successful use cases." Apple has also struggled with attracting rapid development of apps and experiences for the headset.

Kuo likened the thinking at Apple to the company's experience with the HomePod line. "Even after launching the cheaper HomePod mini, Apple's smart speakers failed to become mainstream products," he said.

Kuo does not say whether this news comes from his industry sources, or is once again solely his extrapolation from his experience covering Apple.

However, his projection about plans being revamped for the lower cost Apple Vision Pro is backed up by a Bloomberg report. That report claims that Apple is "seriously considering" developing a cheaper "Apple Vision" headset that offloads most if not all of the computing duties to the user's iPhone. Such a device might look more like existing AR smart glasses.

Rumor Score: Possible

Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 14
    omasouomasou Posts: 640member
    I agree with this 100% "simply reducing the price wouldn't help create successful use cases."

    If they release a less expensive version the only thing that will happen is that people will complain how cheap it is and how it needs this and that and in reality what they will really be describing the current version.

    Apple needs to focus on AR not VR.

    The only thing that will make VR mainstream is if the headset disappears, i.e. is light weight, comfortable and users don't notice that they are wearing them.
    dewmeAlex1Nnubus
  • Reply 2 of 14
    PemaPema Posts: 156member
    If you happen to follow the upheaval in the car industry - several excellent videos on YouTube - the paradigm shift will validate the Apple Car. The Chinese car manufacturers realised some few years back that the future of the automobile is not the anachronistic ICE engine and tailpipe emission but the battery driven vehicle managed by software. That's the future and it is happening right now. So much so that the world's no. 2 car manufacturer VW - nine brands - will be closing three plants across Germany and laying off ½ million workers. Why? Because they dragged their feet transitioning from the ICE model to the BEV. 
    Which is exactly what Apple was working on when they scrapped the Apple car project in favour of this pointless device that nobody wants called the Vision Pro. 
    In less than five years time Apple historians will look back at 2023/2024 and point to Apple's greatest mistake: scrapping the Apple car project. 
    It should have been called the Apple Software Driven Vehicle. With Apple's second to none software skills it would have easily catapulted Apple to a $6 trillion company on the back of supplying the Apple SDV to millions of cars worldwide. 
    Also, in less than 5 years China will upend the car industry to become the world's no. 1 car manufacturer. The only reason that Toyota is still no. 1 is because it has the hybrid market. Which for now is viable. As soon as the BEV charging infrastructure matures motorists the world over will switch to Chinese BEV cars. Toyota has absolutely nothing viable in this market. And neither do the Germans. 
    This is the same paradigm shift that upended Kodak when they missed the Digital Camera Market and Nokia missed the Smartphone shift. Where are Kodak and Nokia now? Good question. 
    Apple got skittish and missed the boat on BEV software for cars. Huge, massive mistake to focus on the ridiculous Vision Pro and pouring more and more resources into iPhones with better cameras. Great. When is that gravy train going to dry up? Soon, very soon. 
    Xiaomi, the Chinese smartphone maker is now directly linked up to the Chinese car manufacturers supplying them with BEV software management. 
    Apple could have been the worldwide supplier of software for German, American, Italian and Japanese car manufacturers who collectively manufacture over 20million cars per year. Instead Apple is pushing s**t uphill with Vision Pro. 
    Dumb. Really dumb. 
    canukstormAlex1Ndope_ahmine
  • Reply 3 of 14
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,742member
    Pema said:
    If you happen to follow the upheaval in the car industry - several excellent videos on YouTube - the paradigm shift will validate the Apple Car. The Chinese car manufacturers realised some few years back that the future of the automobile is not the anachronistic ICE engine and tailpipe emission but the battery driven vehicle managed by software. That's the future and it is happening right now. So much so that the world's no. 2 car manufacturer VW - nine brands - will be closing three plants across Germany and laying off ½ million workers. Why? Because they dragged their feet transitioning from the ICE model to the BEV. 
    Which is exactly what Apple was working on when they scrapped the Apple car project in favour of this pointless device that nobody wants called the Vision Pro. 
    In less than five years time Apple historians will look back at 2023/2024 and point to Apple's greatest mistake: scrapping the Apple car project. 
    It should have been called the Apple Software Driven Vehicle. With Apple's second to none software skills it would have easily catapulted Apple to a $6 trillion company on the back of supplying the Apple SDV to millions of cars worldwide. 
    Also, in less than 5 years China will upend the car industry to become the world's no. 1 car manufacturer. The only reason that Toyota is still no. 1 is because it has the hybrid market. Which for now is viable. As soon as the BEV charging infrastructure matures motorists the world over will switch to Chinese BEV cars. Toyota has absolutely nothing viable in this market. And neither do the Germans. 
    This is the same paradigm shift that upended Kodak when they missed the Digital Camera Market and Nokia missed the Smartphone shift. Where are Kodak and Nokia now? Good question. 
    Apple got skittish and missed the boat on BEV software for cars. Huge, massive mistake to focus on the ridiculous Vision Pro and pouring more and more resources into iPhones with better cameras. Great. When is that gravy train going to dry up? Soon, very soon. 
    Xiaomi, the Chinese smartphone maker is now directly linked up to the Chinese car manufacturers supplying them with BEV software management. 
    Apple could have been the worldwide supplier of software for German, American, Italian and Japanese car manufacturers who collectively manufacture over 20million cars per year. Instead Apple is pushing s**t uphill with Vision Pro. 
    Dumb. Really dumb. 
    "Which is exactly what Apple was working on when they scrapped the Apple car project in favour of this pointless device that nobody wants called the Vision Pro. 
    In less than five years time Apple historians will look back at 2023/2024 and point to Apple's greatest mistake: scrapping the Apple car project."

    Hit the nail on the head.  100% agree
    williamlondon
  • Reply 4 of 14
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,612member
    I'm not sure why anyone here thinks Apple is not trying to make CarPlay standard on most vehicles. It already is for every car with a USB port where the owner has an iPhone.

    You'd think the car companies would take the hint, but no ... they want spend vast sums of money trying to create their own craptastic ad-ridden nav-ertainment system. My work vehicle has the Ford system with free-to-me XM radio and I literally cannot plug in my iPhone fast enough. If it were my car I'd upgrade to wireless CarPlay.

    The company that offers me wireless CarPlay compatibility gets my new-vehicle money, and ISTR a story here about a survey that a really high percentage of car buyers demand at a minimum CarPlay compatibility, at least in the US.
    Alex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 14
    PemaPema Posts: 156member
    chasm said:
    I'm not sure why anyone here thinks Apple is not trying to make CarPlay standard on most vehicles. It already is for every car with a USB port where the owner has an iPhone.

    You'd think the car companies would take the hint, but no ... they want spend vast sums of money trying to create their own craptastic ad-ridden nav-ertainment system. My work vehicle has the Ford system with free-to-me XM radio and I literally cannot plug in my iPhone fast enough. If it were my car I'd upgrade to wireless CarPlay.

    The company that offers me wireless CarPlay compatibility gets my new-vehicle money, and ISTR a story here about a survey that a really high percentage of car buyers demand at a minimum CarPlay compatibility, at least in the US.
    The Apple Car Play is rather lame. All that it does is slavishly mimic some of the very basic apps onto to your head unit. Where I live it saves me having to reach for my iPhone when I need to make a call or receive an SMS - something the local cops frown on with a hefty fine. Other than that. Naught. What the ACP does not do, is offer any stats or manage the software that runs the BEV. That latter functionality would be something. But Apple under Tim Cook and Co. missed that and cancelled the Apple Car Project. So Xiaomi - in China - stepped into the fray and has teamed up with the Chinese car companies to offer that software. 
    No wonder Warren Buffet is divesting his Apple shares. He is a smart and astute investor and sees zero growth in riding the iPhone gravy train into the sunset. Innovation has stagnated at Apple by milking the same cash cows for the last decade. 
    Alex1Ncanukstormdope_ahmine
  • Reply 6 of 14
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,612member
    Pema said:
    Where I live it saves me having to reach for my iPhone when I need to make a call or receive an SMS - something the local cops frown on with a hefty fine. Other than that. Naught. What the ACP does not do, is offer any stats or manage the software that runs the BEV. That latter functionality would be something. But Apple under Tim Cook and Co. missed that and cancelled the Apple Car Project. So Xiaomi - in China - stepped into the fray and has teamed up with the Chinese car companies to offer that software. 
    No wonder Warren Buffet is divesting his Apple shares. He is a smart and astute investor and sees zero growth in riding the iPhone gravy train into the sunset. Innovation has stagnated at Apple by milking the same cash cows for the last decade. 
    Apple rolled out a version of CarPlay that runs on multiple screens within cars and contains plenty of vehicle management. See also here:

    The problem is not Apple. The problem, as I stated in my first post in this thread, is the car makers (apart from Porsche and Aston-Martin).

    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 14
    mattinozmattinoz Posts: 2,486member
    Apple Vision Pro may get an M5 upgrade in 2025, but the expected lower-price headset has been delayed, and may offload processing to the iPhone to cut costs.

    Close-up of Apple Vision Pro headset with reflective, glossy black surface and blue tint, surrounded by blurred people in the background.
    Apple Vision Pro on display at Apple Park. Image credit: Apple
    Ming-Chi Kuo

    says that production of an all-new version of the Apple Vision Pro has been pushed back to "beyond 2027." He claims that the current existing model will be replaced with an identical one upgraded to an M5 processor in 2025.

    As I understand it, production of the cheaper Vision Pro has been delayed beyond 2027 for a while now. This means Apple's only new head-mounted display device in 2025 will be the Vision Pro with an upgraded M5 processor.

    I think what really drove Apple to delay the cheaper

    -- (Ming-Chi Kuo) (@mingchikuo)



    He says that Apple has chosen to delay a rumored less-expensive Apple Vision Pro due to reasoning that "simply reducing the price wouldn't help create successful use cases." Apple has also struggled with attracting rapid development of apps and experiences for the headset.

    Kuo likened the thinking at Apple to the company's experience with the HomePod line. "Even after launching the cheaper HomePod mini, Apple's smart speakers failed to become mainstream products," he said.

    Kuo does not say whether this news comes from his industry sources, or is once again solely his extrapolation from his experience covering Apple.

    However, his projection about plans being revamped for the lower cost Apple Vision Pro is backed up by a Bloomberg report. That report claims that Apple is "seriously considering" developing a cheaper "Apple Vision" headset that offloads most if not all of the computing duties to the user's iPhone. Such a device might look more like existing AR smart glasses.

    Rumor Score: Possible

    Read on AppleInsider

    So we seem to be in the throwing muck at the wall hoping to have some success in predicting stuff phase of what is version 2?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 14
    omasou said:
    If they release a less expensive version the only thing that will happen is that people will complain how cheap it is
    …this is probably the biggest complaint I hear about Apple products, how inexpensive they are.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 14
    PemaPema Posts: 156member
    Apple Vision Pro is a bottomless money pit that will drain billions of dollars and countless resources. Dump it. Resurrect the Apple Car Project as the Apple Vehicle Software Management and partner with UK, US, German and Japanese car companies to match or beat the Chinese at this game. Vehicle Software Management is many trillion dollar revenue stream. 

    The sooner that Apple gets into this game the sooner it will have beaucoup car companies locked in. The longer they wait the quicker the car companies will partner up with Chinese software companies like Xiaomi. 

    Luca Maestri is retiring and Tim Cook ought to retire along with him. It is time that new blood took over at Apple to fashion a future built away from iPhones and all the other thingamajigs that bring in $ but not the big bucks that is Apple's cash cow. 
  • Reply 10 of 14
    If car manufacturers finally agree to work with apple we will see Apple become the “Android” of car software; which initial mass market adoption within 5 years and as Apple improves their servers I won’t be surprised if car companies start to share individual’s car data to Apple in as Apple’s Private cloud Computing platform improves. And in a stretch thought, 10-15 years cars on the road will run full self driving as 40% of the market is in some way connected to Apple’s combined network with the other 60% running on their own software and/or older models. Almost like a Apple hive mind!

    Edit: my comment is based off of the Apple car discussion from above.
    edited November 4 watto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 14
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,742member
    chasm said:
    Pema said:
    Where I live it saves me having to reach for my iPhone when I need to make a call or receive an SMS - something the local cops frown on with a hefty fine. Other than that. Naught. What the ACP does not do, is offer any stats or manage the software that runs the BEV. That latter functionality would be something. But Apple under Tim Cook and Co. missed that and cancelled the Apple Car Project. So Xiaomi - in China - stepped into the fray and has teamed up with the Chinese car companies to offer that software. 
    No wonder Warren Buffet is divesting his Apple shares. He is a smart and astute investor and sees zero growth in riding the iPhone gravy train into the sunset. Innovation has stagnated at Apple by milking the same cash cows for the last decade. 
    Apple rolled out a version of CarPlay that runs on multiple screens within cars and contains plenty of vehicle management. See also here:

    The problem is not Apple. The problem, as I stated in my first post in this thread, is the car makers (apart from Porsche and Aston-Martin).

    Why GM is ditching Apple CarPlay, with software boss Baris Cetinok - The Verge
    chasm
  • Reply 12 of 14
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,742member
    Pema said:
    Apple Vision Pro is a bottomless money pit that will drain billions of dollars and countless resources. Dump it. Resurrect the Apple Car Project as the Apple Vehicle Software Management and partner with UK, US, German and Japanese car companies to match or beat the Chinese at this game. Vehicle Software Management is many trillion dollar revenue stream. 

    The sooner that Apple gets into this game the sooner it will have beaucoup car companies locked in. The longer they wait the quicker the car companies will partner up with Chinese software companies like Xiaomi. 

    Luca Maestri is retiring and Tim Cook ought to retire along with him. It is time that new blood took over at Apple to fashion a future built away from iPhones and all the other thingamajigs that bring in $ but not the big bucks that is Apple's cash cow. 
    I agree with your general premise but will car companies be willing to allow Apple to take over the platforms of their products?  GM's software boss has already said that they're ditching Apple altogether in their vehicles (see link above).
    williamlondon
  • Reply 13 of 14
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,612member

    I agree with your general premise but will car companies be willing to allow Apple to take over the platforms of their products?  GM's software boss has already said that they're ditching Apple altogether in their vehicles (see link above).
    GM and others won’t let Apple handled the infotainment system because they see it as a subscription cash cow. If you need proof that Apple doesn’t try to monetize literally everything they do, I present to you CarPlay.

    If GM actually BLOCKS ME from using CarPlay instead of their shit system, then I don’t buy GM products until that changes. Me and 70 percent of iPhone owning car buyers, according the article I linked earlier.
    edited November 4 williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 14
    omasouomasou Posts: 640member
    omasou said:
    If they release a less expensive version the only thing that will happen is that people will complain how cheap it is
    …this is probably the biggest complaint I hear about Apple products, how inexpensive they are.
    Seems I have to explain for folks that skim comments.

    Cheap as in "inexpensive because of inferior quality" not cheap as in less expensive.


    watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.