iMac M4 review: Minor changes lead to perfection for Apple's all-in-one Mac

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware

Apple's 2024 iMac M4 got some internal updates to a familiar design, and the bevy of those small changes helped Apple perfect its ever-popular all-in-one.

Green computer monitor with Apple logo on a white desk, brick wall background, and a framed 'appleinsider' poster.
iMac M4 review: The new 2024 M4 iMac in green



The new wave of colorful iMacs debuted in November 2024, alongside upgraded MacBook Pros and a redesigned Mac mini. We picked one up and have been testing it out in the studio for the past two week or so.

Unsurprisingly, we were happy with what Apple delivered here.

Our machine is a base, 8-core M4 in the striking new green. It has 16GB of memory and 256GB of storage.



It powers a large 24-inch 4.5K display that measures 4480-by-2520 with 500 nits of brightness. If you opt for the 10-core model, you can get a nano-texture finish on the glass.

We have the same texture on the new MacBook Pro and it's lovely, especially if working in a well-lit space.

The new iMac at the low-end is expandable to 24GB of memory and 1TB of storage. Once more, opting for the 10-core gives you more choices, including up to 32GB of memory and 2TB of storage.

iMac M4 review: Design



We're currently on the third refresh of the existing iMac design. As it did from the beginning, it looks stunning perched on your desk.

It's thin and svelte and looks better than most standalone displays, putting aside the fact there's an entire computer hidden inside of its chin.

Apple pushed its colors this time, making them a bit more vibrant than before. When viewed from behind, the anodized aluminum enclosure pops even more.

Seven colorful desktop computers displayed in green, yellow, orange, pink, purple, blue, and silver, with images and apps on their screens.
iMac M4 review: The new colors are bright and pink looks actually pink!



We like all the new colors, and it's clear the pink is actually pink this time around. Unfortunately, there's no deep red color though.

One last note on the colors -- you no longer need to buy an upgrade model if you want something other than silver. All colors are available at every price point.

Otherwise, it's what we had before. An all-in-one Mac that is largely screen.

A green panel features a circular power button icon. The background displays a blurred, red brick pattern.
iMac M4 review: Power button is located on the back-right side



The ports are located around the back, as is the power button. It has a camera integrated above the screen and you can optionally get an ethernet port built into the power supply.

iMac M4 review: Small, but mighty updates



Even if it looks the same, there have been a number of welcomed tweaks Apple has implemented. These start with the ports on the back.

On the upper-tier models, the iMac used to be split between USB and Thunderbolt ports. It felt very un-Apple as they all were type-C connectors.

A green-colored electronic device and a small, spherical orange speaker on tripod legs are set against a pinkish brick wall background.
iMac M4 review: Thunderbolt 4 ports on the base model



This made it a little unclear, especially from the front, what the differences were and which were which. Now, they're all Thunderbolt 4 across the board.

On the base model, you're still limited to two ports, but they're at least both Thunderbolt 4. More ports is one of the biggest reasons to pay the $200 to upgrade to the next model.

Another update is the change to base memory. Apple has moved every Mac to 16GB of unified memory as a starting point.

This has been long-requested and Apple is finally giving in. Apple Intelligence may be playing a part in that.

Webcam lens centered on a laptop bezel, with the screen displaying a green hue.
iMac M4 review: The upgraded camera



The camera is now a 12MP Center Stage-equipped shooter which is still limited to 1080P. It does support Desk View with this change.

Desk View uses the camera to capture then perspective-correct the area right in front of your iMac to show on screen. This can be shared on a call or recorded.

Smiling man with short hair in a room with plants and a bright light, displayed on a computer screen with a green background and app icons.
iMac M4 review: The new camera looks more saturated and better exposed



It's been a feature for a while, but it now works natively on the iMac without need an extra camera or your iPhone. Otherwise, the camera is also richer with better color balance.

We also got new peripherals. Nothing flashy, but they did move to USB-C.

Modern computer setup with a green monitor, white keyboard, and mouse on a white desk. An orange spherical speaker stands against a red brick wall.
iMac M4 review: Your accessories will be color-matched to your iMac



They otherwise haven't changed at all, other than having the colors tweaked to match the new machines. It seems like a missed opportunity for Apple not to add some new features to them.

Oddly, you can also no longer choose both the Magic Keyboard and Magic Mouse at checkout. You have to purchase the second pointing device separately.

Two metallic green computer mice with smooth surfaces and black logos on a light gray background.
iMac M4 review: The old (left) and new (right) Magic Mouse



While working in graphics, we like using both the trackpad and a mouse and it doesn't make sense why Apple took this option away. It was possible with the M3 iMac.

Apple Intelligence



Since Apple won't stop talking about it, we probably should touch on Apple Intelligence during this review. At the time of this review, we're running macOS Sequoia 15.1.

Apple's AI features have been rolling out in stages. The first feature arrived with this update and were available at this machine's launch.

The notable feature so far include notification summaries, Writing Tools, and an updated Siri interface. More will be arriving over the next time, including macOS 15.2 with Image Playground and ChatGPT integration.

Sadly, this first batch of features is underwhelming. We have liked using Writing Tools, but we're a group of writers, so we probably use it more than you average user will.

Text with a popup window to use Writing Tools to edit
iMac M4 review: Writing tools with macOS Sequoia



Notifications summaries are great, though they have a ways to go before they're fully reliable. Some of the responses we've seen have been fairly inaccurate.

Siri's improvements amount to little more than fresh paint at this point in time. A handy shortcut of double pressing the CMD key does open a typing interface which is nice.

The rub is that Siri is no more capable than before, so far. We still have to wait on ChatGPT this winter and personal context to come sometime in 2025, and we'll obviously be talking about them as they roll out.

To be clear, none of this is specific to the new M4 iMac. These features are all available on any Apple-silicon based iMac, up to and including the originally redesigned M1 iMac.

These features are nice, but it's too early to tell how effective they are and where Apple intends to grow them. Time will tell how that develops, but this machine will be ready.

iMac M4 review: Performance



The M4 chip comes in 8-core and 10-core configurations. That's four performance cores and either four or six efficiency cores.

Bar chart comparing Geekbench single-core scores: M4 scores 3835, outperforming M3 at 3040.
iMac M4 review: Geekbench Single-core results



Apple says there's a 70% performance boost from the M1 and a 30% boost from the M3. That's roughly on par with what we've seen in our testing benchmarks.

In daily tasks, it doesn't feel much different at all from our M3 model. But people buying into the iMac aren't usually upgrading yearly, so it's not surprising why Apple is comparing it to the M1 model.

Bar chart comparing Geekbench multi-core scores: M4 scored 13,589, outperforming M3 with 11,694.
iMac M4 review: Geekbench multi-core benchmarks



In Geekbench 6, our iMac scored a 3835 single-core and a 13589 multi-core. That's up from 3040 and 11694 on the M3 model.

On the Metal graphics benchmark, the GPU went from 41515 to 48468. That's especially impressive when the base model went from a 10-core to an 8-core GPU.

Bar chart comparing Geekbench GPU Metal scores: M4 scores 48,468, M3 scores 41,515.
iMac M4 review: GPU results in Geekbench



We threw a bunch of tasks at this machine, including 4K video editing in Final Cut, and it had no issue with any of them. Even dozens and dozens of open tabs in Safari.

iMac M4 review: Still a bargain



It's hard not to argue that the iMac is an incredible bargain -- assuming you don't already have a display or peripherals at least.

If you picked up a new Mac mini, a Magic Keyboard, and a Magic Mouse, you'd be at almost $800. Sans display.

By the time you tack on a somewhat comparable monitor, you're higher than the price of the iMac. We say somewhat because it's next to impossible to find a 24-inch 4.5K display.

When you include the performance of Apple Silicon, and look outside the Mac ecosystem, it's still shockingly competitive.

Apple's typical fashion is to release a new machine with a new design, monitor feedback, then iterate with small changes over the coming years until you get a near-perfect implementation.

That's where we've arrived. The design still stuns but now the colors are better, the camera is sharper, the peripherals are USB-C, the M4 flies -- it's all impeccably refined.

A sleek computer setup with a green-themed monitor, keyboard, mouse, black speaker, and small orange speaker on a white desk against a brick wall.
iMac M4 review: The new iMac is a great all-in-one



There's nearly nothing to complain about with the new iMac. Some may criticize the starting storage of 256GB, but that's easily expandable on a desktop though external solutions.

The base will be fine for a lot of users, but if you can swing it, the $200 upgrade gets you the 10-core CPU, 10-core GPU, two more Thunderbolt ports, and Ethernet. It's a decent bump for Apple's upgrades.

Overall, it isn't the flashiest of updates but you'd be hard pressed to find a better machine suited for education, families, and even many businesses.

iMac M4 review: Pros

  • Colors are more saturated

  • Now starts with 16GB of memory

  • Nano texture finish looks great

  • All Thunderbolt ports

  • Colors aren't locked to upper tier

  • Peripherals are all USB-C

iMac M4 review: Cons

  • 256GB of starting storage is lower than we like. but it's expandable with external drives

  • Without M4 Pro, High-end users need to look elsewhere

iMac M4 rating: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy Apple's M4 iMac at a discount



Apple's 24-inch iMac is on sale now, with every configuration discounted in our M4 iMac Price Guide.

In the Price Guide, you can shop top iMac deals across popular Apple resellers, including Adorama, where promo code APINSIDER knocks up to $150 off every set of specs in addition to bonus savings on a 3-year AppleCare plan.

At press time, Amazon also is throwing a sale -- with retail models marked down to as low as $1,149.99.



Read on AppleInsider

Alex1N

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 19
    "By the time you tack on a somewhat comparable monitor, you're higher than the price of the iMac. We say somewhat because it's next to impossible to find a 24-inch 4.5K display."

    This doesn't make any sense.  The two port $1,299 iMac should never be recommended or considered.  The $1,499 iMac with four ports and 10/10 core M4 CPU is 16/256.  The Mac mini 10/10 core 16/512 is half the price at $799 with twice the storage, and you get more ports.  The iMac with 512GB storage to match jumps to $1,699.  Most people are not going to shop for a 24" display to match the iMac.  In fact, there are far better and larger 4K displays to match up with the mini and still be less than the price of an iMac.  Even if you bought a new keyboard and mouse, you can do it for less than the price of an equally configured iMac.

    Even the iMac with 10/10 M4 with 24/512 is $1,899, compared to the considerably faster M4 Pro Mac mini with 24/512 at $1,399.  Add a 28" 4K display and you are still less than the price of the iMac.  No one will see the difference between 4K and 4.5K, but they will all prefer larger than 24".  The iMac should not even be recommended when the Mac mini offers more for less money.  Apple blew it when they discontinued the iMac 27".  They could have had a killer iMac 27" with M Pro or M Max CPUs.
    Scot1watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 19
    Rogue01 said:
    "By the time you tack on a somewhat comparable monitor, you're higher than the price of the iMac. We say somewhat because it's next to impossible to find a 24-inch 4.5K display."

    This doesn't make any sense.  The two port $1,299 iMac should never be recommended or considered.  The $1,499 iMac with four ports and 10/10 core M4 CPU is 16/256.  The Mac mini 10/10 core 16/512 is half the price at $799 with twice the storage, and you get more ports.  The iMac with 512GB storage to match jumps to $1,699.  Most people are not going to shop for a 24" display to match the iMac.  In fact, there are far better and larger 4K displays to match up with the mini and still be less than the price of an iMac.  Even if you bought a new keyboard and mouse, you can do it for less than the price of an equally configured iMac.
    I think you may have forgotten the cost of the magic keyboard and magic mouse in your comparison.  Like the author pointed out, those 2 together run another $300.  There are definitely cheaper mouse keyboard combos out there though. The cost for the mini 10/10 core with 16/512 and a magic keyboard and mouse is $1097. That leaves you $600 to buy a monitor in 4k rez with an integrated webcam, mic, and speakers. You can get an LG MyView Smart monitor for about $500. You would get a bigger screen but only 4k Rez (which is worse and noticeably so stretched over a 32 inch screen) and a webcam that might be 1080p but not CenterStage or DeskView capable and speakers that are not Atmos capable.
    All of that is to say, that you can definitely get lower than Apple's $1700 iMac with a mini, but only with compromises. Each user has to decide for themselves if the savings vs compromises balance out.  The lower than $1700 you pay, the more compromises you have to accept.
    I often think on this very subject, because i have an M1 iMac. Changing a Mac mini for $600-800 is easier and can be done more frequently than trading up on the iMac, but I'm not willing to accept the compromises or pay even more for a Studio Display just to come off cheaper on the next mini upgrade. I wish Apple would come out with a monitor for $899-999. Alas, that will almost certainly never happen as the math would just tip too far in favor of the mini and kill the iMac.
    edited November 19 Scot1chiawatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 19
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,407member
    Just a great computer for students from the third grade thru college, parents and grandparents and anyone else that wants a good clean design with a powerful M4 processor combined with a very good 4.5k screen. (with a long usable lifespan) 

    This computer is designed for the other 98% and it’s more than enough, considering how many young people who will own a (hand me down) iPhone or an iPad from a older family member to go with it. It’s a win for Apple….
    edited November 19 canukstormdewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 19
    nubusnubus Posts: 618member
    Perfection? We're talking something at the speed of the base Mac mini fused with a dated and small 23.5" LED display. It has a huge chin and unlike previous iMac models it can't be adjusted or upgraded at all. You need to guess the position of any connector as they are all hidden (unlike the new mini). The only sensible way to pay for storage is to buy external... and then it really isn't all-in-one. The USP is to have fans closer to your ears than on any other model. Amazing.

    Students will ask for MBA. Those looking beyond 23.5" or for M4 Pro performance or to get value or a height-adjustable display or use the ports or those having a display/input devices will look at Mac mini. iMac M4 is the computer we don't need.
  • Reply 5 of 19
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,407member
    nubus said:
    Perfection? We're talking something at the speed of the base Mac mini fused with a dated and small 23.5" LED display. It has a huge chin and unlike previous iMac models it can't be adjusted or upgraded at all. You need to guess the position of any connector as they are all hidden (unlike the new mini). The only sensible way to pay for storage is to buy external... and then it really isn't all-in-one. The USP is to have fans closer to your ears than on any other model. Amazing.

    Students will ask for MBA. Those looking beyond 23.5" or for M4 Pro performance or to get value or a height-adjustable display or use the ports or those having a display/input devices will look at Mac mini. iMac M4 is the computer we don't need.
    It’s not for you 98% of the users out there more than enough, oh and those students today, they want a 16 pro or a 15 pro how many parents are gonna pay attention to that most will get that used three or four year old iPhone used by their parents, that 24 inch iMac 4.5K screen is better than most of the cheap 4K PC screens that most people use (all curated Apple screens generally are).

    The only real downside to a Mac mini is finding a good 4K monitor in the PC world, that is actually worse than any memory or SSD configuration you can come up with when buying it.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 19
    Any M-series iMac users, what are your feelings about the external power supply brick?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 19
    mbenz1962 said:
    Rogue01 said:
    "By the time you tack on a somewhat comparable monitor, you're higher than the price of the iMac. We say somewhat because it's next to impossible to find a 24-inch 4.5K display."

    This doesn't make any sense.  The two port $1,299 iMac should never be recommended or considered.  The $1,499 iMac with four ports and 10/10 core M4 CPU is 16/256.  The Mac mini 10/10 core 16/512 is half the price at $799 with twice the storage, and you get more ports.  The iMac with 512GB storage to match jumps to $1,699.  Most people are not going to shop for a 24" display to match the iMac.  In fact, there are far better and larger 4K displays to match up with the mini and still be less than the price of an iMac.  Even if you bought a new keyboard and mouse, you can do it for less than the price of an equally configured iMac.
    I think you may have forgotten the cost of the magic keyboard and magic mouse in your comparison.  Like the author pointed out, those 2 together run another $300.  
    $300?  Where are you shopping???  $149 for Apple Keyboard and $79 for Apple Mouse.  Hardly $300.  Most people buying a Mac mini already have a keyboard and mouse, so unless they want to buy new, they don't need it.  Most are upgrading and use their existing keyboard and mouse.  
    muthuk_vanalingamdanoxwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 19
    No one wants the iMac anymore.  Look at Apple's refurb page.  There are four pages of iMac refurbs, which are typically customer returns.
  • Reply 9 of 19
    The worst thing about the iMac is the external power supply. Why couldn't that be built inside? It would make life so much easier. But, if they keep the power brick, it would be awesome if they would have included a couple of USB ports on it. That way you'd be able to have only the power connector attached to your computer, and all accessories could conveniently attach to the power supply itself. Or, what would be even better is if Apple released an economically priced display that could be powered with the Thunderbolt cable, and you just stick the Mac Mini under your desk and get a beautiful Apple display.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 10 of 19
    davendaven Posts: 729member
    Any M-series iMac users, what are your feelings about the external power supply brick?
    I forgot it used an external power supply brick. Out of sight, out of mind. I have the M3 and maxed it out as at my age it may just be the last computer I own. I only replace my Mac’s about every 15 or so years.
    appleinsideruserwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 19
    nubusnubus Posts: 618member
    danox said:
    nubus said:
    Students will ask for MBA. Those looking beyond 23.5" or for M4 Pro performance or to get value or a height-adjustable display or use the ports or those having a display/input devices will look at Mac mini. iMac M4 is the computer we don't need.
     ... that 24 inch iMac 4.5K screen is better than most of the cheap 4K PC screens that most people use (all curated Apple screens generally are).

    The only real downside to a Mac mini is finding a good 4K monitor in the PC world, that is actually worse than any memory or SSD configuration you can come up with when buying it.
    Students need computing they can bring with them and MacBook Air is it. Look at cost, ergonomics (ports + display), display size, repair costs, or performance. The Mac mini is the better choice. You're right about better displays but 90% of those displays users connect to a Mac are not Retina. There simply is no user demand for Retina on desktop. Even those of my colleagues using Mac Pros with 192 GB RAM don't use Retina displays (motion design).

    iMac is nice for elderly people doing video calls to family members. My mother-in-law is happy about her M1.
    williamlondon
  • Reply 12 of 19
    27 inch. Where is the 27? Or even better, a 30?
    williamlondondanoxnubuswatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 19
    Funny how Apple Insider is pushing these stories - minor upgrade makes iMac best ever, Apple Watch now best ever a year later, iPhone 16 best iPhone ever. Next up expecting Apple Intelligence best ever AI? Seems kind of desperate but then again I am not part of the dumb demographic Apple seems to think the community is made up of. They are right about that though of course! LOL. 
    williamlondon
  • Reply 14 of 19
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,159member
    Hilarious! I came for the inevitable hate-posting about iMac and clueless comments above did not disappoint! iMac is the most successful desktop computer line in history by a country mile but… it can’t be recommended! Why is Apple even making this?! Only powerful enough for kids and grandfolks! (Never mind that it’s on corporate desks everywhere and will run the vast, vast majority of business apps without breaking a sweat.) And lest we forget, there’s this old chestnut: Apple is doomed for killing the 27” iMac. Too funny!

    As usual, the clueless crowd confuses their personal buying priorities as being the same as those of a particular product’s target market. Listen: a Mac mini with a separate monitor may very well be a better deal for YOU. Have at it! iMac buyers don’t care because a top priority is an all-in-one solution that does what they need it to do and looks good doing it. They want what the iMac has always promised: one cable, plug it in, done. The only change in that equation is the unprecedented power that Apple silicon has brought to the iMac. But hey: If your priorities are larger screen sizes and maximizing performance per dollar, then the iMac isn’t for you. Pretty simple, eh?

    Well, now you can go back to hate-posting and waiting on your 27” iMac. 

    williamlondondanoxchiawatto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 19
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,159member

    brianjo said:
    The worst thing about the iMac is the external power supply. Why couldn't that be built inside? It would make life so much easier. But, if they keep the power brick, it would be awesome if they would have included a couple of USB ports on it. That way you'd be able to have only the power connector attached to your computer, and all accessories could conveniently attach to the power supply itself. Or, what would be even better is if Apple released an economically priced display that could be powered with the Thunderbolt cable, and you just stick the Mac Mini under your desk and get a beautiful Apple display.
    Agree that the power brick is less than ideal, but a necessary compromise to achieve the thinness of the iMac redesign. I suspect this will not be necessary whenever the iMac design gets refreshed again.  Since power bricks tend to live on the floor if not hidden away outright, that’s not a great place for accessory ports. Given the incredible pricing on the new Mac minis, an $899 or $999 27” display could be a hot seller for Apple. But… with the Studio Display at $1599, what does this cheaper display give up to allow the Studio Display to still be “worth” its much higher price tag? I don’t know an acceptable answer to that question. And If you’re hoping for something even cheaper from Apple, dream on. 
    williamlondondanoxwatto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 19
    charlesn said:

    brianjo said:
    The worst thing about the iMac is the external power supply. Why couldn't that be built inside? It would make life so much easier. But, if they keep the power brick, it would be awesome if they would have included a couple of USB ports on it. That way you'd be able to have only the power connector attached to your computer, and all accessories could conveniently attach to the power supply itself. Or, what would be even better is if Apple released an economically priced display that could be powered with the Thunderbolt cable, and you just stick the Mac Mini under your desk and get a beautiful Apple display.
    Agree that the power brick is less than ideal, but a necessary compromise to achieve the thinness of the iMac redesign. I suspect this will not be necessary whenever the iMac design gets refreshed again.  Since power bricks tend to live on the floor if not hidden away outright, that’s not a great place for accessory ports. Given the incredible pricing on the new Mac minis, an $899 or $999 27” display could be a hot seller for Apple. But… with the Studio Display at $1599, what does this cheaper display give up to allow the Studio Display to still be “worth” its much higher price tag? I don’t know an acceptable answer to that question. And If you’re hoping for something even cheaper from Apple, dream on. 
    What does it give up? Size. I didn't buy an iMac cos its screen was too small for me, it hurt to buy a Studio Display — but it was worth it!
    williamlondondanoxwatto_cobra
  • Reply 17 of 19
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,407member
    charlesn said:

    brianjo said:
    The worst thing about the iMac is the external power supply. Why couldn't that be built inside? It would make life so much easier. But, if they keep the power brick, it would be awesome if they would have included a couple of USB ports on it. That way you'd be able to have only the power connector attached to your computer, and all accessories could conveniently attach to the power supply itself. Or, what would be even better is if Apple released an economically priced display that could be powered with the Thunderbolt cable, and you just stick the Mac Mini under your desk and get a beautiful Apple display.
    Agree that the power brick is less than ideal, but a necessary compromise to achieve the thinness of the iMac redesign. I suspect this will not be necessary whenever the iMac design gets refreshed again.  Since power bricks tend to live on the floor if not hidden away outright, that’s not a great place for accessory ports. Given the incredible pricing on the new Mac minis, an $899 or $999 27” display could be a hot seller for Apple. But… with the Studio Display at $1599, what does this cheaper display give up to allow the Studio Display to still be “worth” its much higher price tag? I don’t know an acceptable answer to that question. And If you’re hoping for something even cheaper from Apple, dream on. 
    What does it give up? Size. I didn't buy an iMac cos its screen was too small for me, it hurt to buy a Studio Display — but it was worth it!
    The Apple Studio Display is a great monitor worth every penny, I dream of a iMac M4, M5 or M6 inside of an 30”-32” XDR enclosure, price no problem because Apple is paying for it.
    edited November 21 appleinsideruserwatto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 19
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,159member
    charlesn said:

    brianjo said:
    The worst thing about the iMac is the external power supply. Why couldn't that be built inside? It would make life so much easier. But, if they keep the power brick, it would be awesome if they would have included a couple of USB ports on it. That way you'd be able to have only the power connector attached to your computer, and all accessories could conveniently attach to the power supply itself. Or, what would be even better is if Apple released an economically priced display that could be powered with the Thunderbolt cable, and you just stick the Mac Mini under your desk and get a beautiful Apple display.
    Agree that the power brick is less than ideal, but a necessary compromise to achieve the thinness of the iMac redesign. I suspect this will not be necessary whenever the iMac design gets refreshed again.  Since power bricks tend to live on the floor if not hidden away outright, that’s not a great place for accessory ports. Given the incredible pricing on the new Mac minis, an $899 or $999 27” display could be a hot seller for Apple. But… with the Studio Display at $1599, what does this cheaper display give up to allow the Studio Display to still be “worth” its much higher price tag? I don’t know an acceptable answer to that question. And If you’re hoping for something even cheaper from Apple, dream on. 
    What does it give up? Size. I didn't buy an iMac cos its screen was too small for me, it hurt to buy a Studio Display — but it was worth it!
    Ummm… I wasn’t talking about the iMac. The subject was a theoretical 27” Apple display priced at $899-$999 and what that would have to give up relative to the Studio Display to achieve that price point. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 19
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,746member
    Any M-series iMac users, what are your feelings about the external power supply brick?
    The external power supply with integrated Ethernet connector is an excellent feature if you want to limit the number of wires/cables going from underneath the desk to the top of the desk. My wife loves it.
    appleinsideruserwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.