Apple Intelligence has been seven years in the making, says Cook

Posted:
in General Discussion edited December 2024

In a new interview, CEO Tim Cook says that Apple began looking into what became Apple Intelligence in 2017, just as Apple Park was opening.

Credit: Apple
Credit: Apple



It's been repeatedly claimed that Apple is behind the industry on artificial intelligence, and that's just as often been refuted. Now before it became known as Apple Intelligence, Tim Cook says that AI crept up on Apple -- but crept up a long time ago.

"I wouldn't say there was an aha moment," he told Steven Levy in Wired. "It built like a wave, or like rolling thunder."

"Back in 2017 we built a neural engine into our products," he continued. "It was already apparent that AI and machine learning were huge... It became obvious that we had to divert lots of people to it, that it would be a new era for our products."

It was 2018 when Apple hired away Google's head of AI, John Giannandrea, and he has said that machine learning soon permeated everything. But it wasn't until 2024 that Apple announced Apple Intelligence.

Following the announcement at WWDC, Apple debuted certain Apple Intelligence features in iOS 18.1. Much more is due in iOS 18.2, and it is intended to continue improving at least throughout 2025.

Making AI useful but private



Saying that Apple "wanted to innovate in such a way that things would be personal and private," Cook reveals that there was a debate before settling on the name Apple Intelligence. But he also says that there was no debate and not even a discussion about charging users for AI tools.

"We never talked about charging for it," says Cook. "We view it sort of like multitouch, which enabled the smartphone revolution and the modern tablet."

Cook insists that Apple Intelligence doesn't replace people, it helps them do things better. "It's still coming from you," he says. "It's your thoughts and your perspective."

He makes the analogy that "Logic Pro helps musicians create music, but they're still the author." And he compares AI to "the productivity that came from the advent of the personal computer."

Cook is less convincing about one of Apple's own ads that sees a job candidate use Apple Intelligence to rewrite their cover letter to sound more professional.

"By using the tool, [the application] comes across as more polished," he says. "It's still your decision to use the tool. It's like you and I collaborating on something -- one plus one can equal more than two, right?"

Working at Apple Park



Cook is also enthused about the collaboration he says Apple Park has brought, calling the decision to build it a 100-year decision."

"[There] are so many places here where you just unexpectedly run into people," he says. "In the cafeteria, at the coffee bar, outside when you're going across the pathway."

It's now three years since Cook said he would "probably" be leaving Apple within a decade. Today he won't put such an exact figure on it, although he says that he gets "asked that question now more than I used to."

"It's a privilege of a lifetime to be here," he continues, "and I'll do it until the voice in my head says, 'It's time,' and then I'll go and focus on what the next chapter looks like."

"But it's hard to imagine life without Apple, because my life has been wrapped up in this company since 1998," says Cook. "It's the overwhelming majority of my adult life. And so I love it."

Separately, Cook has recently been talking more about the start of his career, rather than its end. He's talked about how a family work ethic helps him at Apple today.




Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 17
    gwmacgwmac Posts: 1,819member
    I am using the beta version of iOS that allows ChatGPT integration. In my limited experience so far, the only useful part of Apple intelligence is the inclusion of Chat GPT. Exactly what has Apple been doing with their billions and years of research?  Is there any Apple specific parts of Apple Intelligence that I am not using or haven't noticed yet?  It's a shame that Apple had a huge lead when Siri was brand new but they let it stagnate for so long that it became a running joke in regards to ineptitude. 
    m4m40appleinsideruserelijahg
  • Reply 2 of 17
    gwmac said:
      Is there any Apple specific parts of Apple Intelligence that I am not using or haven't noticed yet? 
    Yes, the Writing Tools are in there. Photo Clean Up is also in there. I really like Writing Tools and find Photo Clean Up to be pretty good as well.

    I think some other small things have been added but I can't say that I use them.







    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 17
    jas99jas99 Posts: 175member
    I use Siri all the time now because it provides instant answers. That’s a big leap from the era when all it would do is take you to the appropriate website.

    it it’s also fantastic for language translations. All I have to do is say for instance, “how do you say in French…”

    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 17
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,479member
    gwmac said:
    I am using the beta version of iOS that allows ChatGPT integration. In my limited experience so far, the only useful part of Apple intelligence is the inclusion of Chat GPT. Exactly what has Apple been doing with their billions and years of research?  Is there any Apple specific parts of Apple Intelligence that I am not using or haven't noticed yet?  It's a shame that Apple had a huge lead when Siri was brand new but they let it stagnate for so long that it became a running joke in regards to ineptitude. 


    You’re not looking very hard. You just wanted to get your three times Microsoft Recall notice in. But Apple has put together a coherent plan and put a system in place that is more well thought out than their competition Microsoft and Google. 

    In fact after Apple presented its Apple Intelligence plans at WWDC the other two nitwits started talking about some of the same things computing AI on the edge, but it hasn’t helped them because they’re still confused on what they are doing and certainly Microsoft with no mobile presence of their own there is only so much Microsoft can do their partnership for example with Qualcomm copilot Snapdragon laptops has been a fiasco.


    edited December 2024 jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 17
    Siri respondes better when the user has eaten some peanut butter, like Alexia with fried eggs or maybe Siri has no response at all when the user had eaten swordfish at lunch. ;)
    edited December 2024
  • Reply 6 of 17
    bulk001bulk001 Posts: 797member
    I would say that Apple has exactly delivered a product for what they think their users to be judging by their commercials - stupid, lazy and ignorant. If this is the result of 7 years of work then there is little hope for much innovation from Apple on any front other than more iterative drips and drabs on iphone, watch and mac. No wonder they couldn't make a car or even a proper update to the Ultra watch line! The days of bold innovation seem to be behind them now. Hoping to be wrong though but don't find this encouraging at all. 
    DAalsethelijahg
  • Reply 7 of 17
    In earlier days I would Compare  "AI" to a Tune like Looney Tunes, later in the future shows up 'intel for....'; today im dizzy and mazed. 
  • Reply 8 of 17
    Apple has been doing machine learning stuff for a long time. So in that sense what Cook says is accurate. However Apple has actively resisted doing anything similar to something like ChatGPT for a long time. 

    Apple has had Siri for a long time and for a long time people wanted to have Siri do what ChatGPT does. They wanted their own Jarvis from Iron Man. And Apple for a long time has considered that a privacy nightmare. It would also have been prohibitively expensive and they could have been first to market with a product that would have been ridiculed even if out of the gate it was as good as GPT 3 was. 

    Apple Maps once told someone to drive into a lake and people still act as if it does that. The media’s standards are far higher than they are for anyone else. 

    OpenAI releasing ChatGPT has moved the needle though. The general population is now much more happy to accept generative AI as both useful and useless at the same time. They know it can be used to do a lot of tasks that people struggle with, but they also are generally aware that you can’t trust the results yourself. 

    In that atmosphere Apple can honestly release tools using LLMs that will get a lot of ‘oh wow!’ And the media won’t make fun of them for being just as imperfect and inaccurate as anyone else’s especially if you give people access to other models within Apple’s UI. 

    Is it some brilliant big brain play? I wouldn’t say so. But at the same time in the last few years I’m sure there have been some brilliant people at Apple who have been focused on how to use LLMs while also confining them to Apple’s ideologies. (Caring about people’s privacy to the extent that they do actually is super important. Because they ensure that one side of the conversation is rooted in a significant privacy focus. And even people who hate Apple should appreciate how much their focus on privacy forces other companies to move a little closer to giving a damn about your safety.)

    But yeah, in terms of saying that Apple has been working on Apple Intelligence for 7 years feels like spin. If you want to look at what Apple was really working on in terms of machine learning look at the Vision Pro.

    Apple’s long term outlook was to move toward you being the centre of your digital hub. It is a really cool plan and long term it could be great. But in the mean time tech is going to go in the direction of perusing generative AI.

    That said, though it’s in the hands of the general public now? The Vision Pro is priced like a concept car. But it’s nearly 2024 and what people really want right now is to be able to have their computers magically do tasks that they find overwhelming and do them quickly and good enough. 

    The dangerous part is going to be, what happens to human intelligence when nobody has to learn to write well? What’s going to happen to art when kids compare their drawings to what AI can do? Humans develop skills through time practicing things so that they can accomplish tasks.

    Not to say I’m sure it’ll be bad. Hundreds of years ago finding clean water was a skill people learned. Our plumbing goes out due to war, I definitely don’t have the skills to find clean drinking water. But yeah, it’ll be interesting to see how AI changes base level human thought for those who grow up with it. 
    elijahgjony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 17

    "Hundreds of years ago finding clean water was a skill people learned." Salt was even more difficult but, but....No, No.

    edited December 2024
  • Reply 10 of 17
    Rogue01Rogue01 Posts: 206member
    jas99 said:
    I use Siri all the time now because it provides instant answers. That’s a big leap from the era when all it would do is take you to the appropriate website.

    it it’s also fantastic for language translations. All I have to do is say for instance, “how do you say in French…”

    Not sure what you are asking Siri to do, but most responses with the latest iOS 18 are still, 'Here is what I found on the internet'.
  • Reply 11 of 17
    Wow.... "seven years in the making, says Cook". I hope it was just two dudes working half time. Elon with his xAi has made a top AI (Grok) in under a year.
    Apple needs to fire 90% of their staff. They are to many activists at Apple doing nothing useful. Tim Cook needs to go. He is just a pussy. 
    Cheap words. Being an armchair CEO is the easiest job in the world.
    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 17
    7 years?  I am somewhat surprise Cook didn't try to use the 1987 Knowledge Navigator concept as the starting point for Apple AI, that would have given Apple an extra 3 decades of development.
    elijahgwatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 17
    Wow.... "seven years in the making, says Cook". I hope it was just two dudes working half time. Elon with his xAi has made a top AI (Grok) in under a year.
    Apple needs to fire 90% of their staff. They are to many activists at Apple doing nothing useful. Tim Cook needs to go. He is just a pussy. 
    You could have saved yourself a bit of tying and just said "I don't know what AI is."
    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 17
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,479member
    bulk001 said:
    I would say that Apple has exactly delivered a product for what they think their users to be judging by their commercials - stupid, lazy and ignorant. If this is the result of 7 years of work then there is little hope for much innovation from Apple on any front other than more iterative drips and drabs on iphone, watch and mac. No wonder they couldn't make a car or even a proper update to the Ultra watch line! The days of bold innovation seem to be behind them now. Hoping to be wrong though but don't find this encouraging at all. 
    In short Apple is not for you go get a Microsoft computer, you need something where the baby and the bathwater is thrown out every 3 to 5 years like GM designing the Corvette over the years they throw everything out and start over. Yeah that innovation all right.
    edited December 2024 jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 17
    IMO, AI is just a tool that can be used, not really a toy to play with (though you can do that too). 

    I had this situation where I was sent photos of a document that I needed to tidy up. I used Photos to extract all the text onto Notes on my iPhone. I then used Apple Intelligence to then tidy up the document to make it more professional. It did a good job and I was really happy with the output.

    The ability to erase background items from photos is also pretty neat and I also find the notifications summaries pretty useful.
    Even the website summaries I tried out were really good and captured the main points of the articles I was reading.

    I think it is all a step in the right direction and I think iOS 18.2 is going to make it even better. 

    I don't really care of feature X or Y was on some other phone/ OS for years. I don't use any other phone besides the iPhone and I really have more faith in the thought Apple puts into its features before it releases them.
    jony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 17
    elijahgelijahg Posts: 2,876member
    Apple was clearly caught completely off guard with generative AI, and are now playing catch up. What happened to skating where the puck was going? OpenAI has only existed for 8 years, from scratch ChatGPT. Cook claims Apple started 7 years ago, and all they really have to show for that supposed 7 years is little more than some in app suggestions and emoji generation, with most everything else it going to ChatGPT - invented by a profit-capped research company whose net revenue was 14,000 times less than Apple's, and with about 1% of its head count. It's embarrassing. Cook needs to find out what their billions in R&D have been spent on, or the board needs to fire Cook for wasting so much time and money on the non-existent Apple Car - which existed as a project since before OpenAI's inception - vs AI. ChatGPT is what Siri was supposed to be, but it was a joke.

    Cook really has zero vision at all. He's a beancounter, he needs to be replaced with someone with vision, passion and inspiration.  Who ever said "when I'm older I want to be like Tim Cook?" No one at all.

    edited December 2024
  • Reply 17 of 17
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,479member
    elijahg said:
    Apple was clearly caught completely off guard with generative AI, and are now playing catch up. What happened to skating where the puck was going? OpenAI has only existed for 8 years, from scratch ChatGPT. Cook claims Apple started 7 years ago, and all they really have to show for that supposed 7 years is little more than some in app suggestions and emoji generation, with most everything else it going to ChatGPT - invented by a profit-capped research company whose net revenue was 14,000 times less than Apple's, and with about 1% of its head count. It's embarrassing. Cook needs to find out what their billions in R&D have been spent on, or the board needs to fire Cook for wasting so much time and money on the non-existent Apple Car - which existed as a project since before OpenAI's inception - vs AI. ChatGPT is what Siri was supposed to be, but it was a joke.

    Cook really has zero vision at all. He's a beancounter, he needs to be replaced with someone with vision, passion and inspiration.  Who ever said "when I'm older I want to be like Tim Cook?" No one at all.

    But yet Tim Cook is miles better than Paul Otellini, Bob Swan or Gelsinger at Intel or those guys currently at Microsoft or Google in the top spot …..


    edited December 2024 jony0watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.